similar to: 11.5.0 - SIP registration not retrying after failures

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "11.5.0 - SIP registration not retrying after failures"

2013 Aug 14
3
DAHDI wct4xxp high system CPU on idle?
I have a system running CentOS 5.9 and DAHDI 2.6.2 with a 2-port E1 card using the wct4xxp driver (also using Asterisk 11.5.0, but that isn't relevant to the question). With DAHDI and Asterisk started, the system appears to run normally, as far as I can tell from limited testing. I am monitoring User, System and Nice CPU usage using SNMP and MRTG, and I have noticed that when I have started
2015 Mar 30
0
How does chan_sip match an ACK?
I am trying to debug a SIP issue, between an Asterisk 1.2.32 system that is behind a network device to which I don't have ready access, which is performing NAT with possibly some kind of SIP ALG, and an Asterisk 11 system on a public IP. My question is very specific, and I don't need right now to discuss the ins and outs of the above setup. What I am seeing is that when I have set up a
2008 Apr 10
1
memory issues with 1.1.rc4 (now it's PAM)
Hi! I'm running 1.1rc4 on a system and this happens occasionally: --8<-- mail.info; dovecot: auth(default): client in: AUTH 1 PLAIN service=imap lip=NN.NN.NN.NN rip=NNN.NN.NNN.NN lport=143 mail.info; dovecot: auth-worker(default): pam(XXXXXXXXXXXX,NNN.NN.NNN.NN): lookup service=imap kern.alert; kernel: grsec: From NN.NN.NN.NN: denied resource overstep by requesting
2015 Mar 31
0
How does chan_sip match an ACK?
In article <mfbt6f$9rt$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > I am trying to debug a SIP issue, between an Asterisk 1.2.32 system that > is behind a network device to which I don't have ready access, which is > performing NAT with possibly some kind of SIP ALG, and an Asterisk 11 > system on a public IP. > > My question is
2015 Oct 18
0
[OT] fail2ban update (epel) breaks logrotate
In article <n009u2$85v$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > Apologies, this is slightly off-topic being to do with an EPEL package, > although it's running on CentOS6, so I thought others here might have come > across this issue. > > I have five CentOS 6 systems running fail2ban from EPEL, and this > package was updated
2006 Oct 13
1
Digium TE410P LED problem
Has anyone else experienced a problem with the LED for span 1 on a TE410P or TE405P? I had a TE410P on which the span 1 LED would not light red, but once the span was connected, it did correctly light green. I RMAed the board to our UK distrbutor and received a replacement. However, the replacement board displayed the same problem! Wondering if it was related to the computer I was putting it
2015 Nov 25
2
Dialing a call back out on same SIP trunk as it came in
In article <20151125133008.6369360.14455.17239 at gmail.com>, Israel Gottlieb <isrlgb at gmail.com> wrote: > Try putting progress instead of answer Yes, I tried Progress already, and it didn't help. But thanks for the suggestion! Tony > I have a puzzling situation, and would be grateful for any insight. > > I have a dialplan that forwards an incoming call out to
2015 Jun 08
2
less for CentOS6 with POSIX regex?
In article <ml1jnh$afr$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > When I started using CentOS 6 instead of CentOS 5, I discovered that > "less" no longer understood \< and \>, which I had been used to using > since almost forever. > > Eventually research revealed that in the Fedora version on which > RHEL 6 was
2017 Sep 01
2
ERROR during high volume MoH dialplan
Thanks for the suggestion Tony, I installed each codec for MoH, core sounds, and extra sound packages. Unfortunately the tests produce the same results. [Sep 1 20:36:45] ERROR[10081][C-00007fe5]: frame.c:343 ast_frdup: FRACK!, Failed assertion Excessive refcount 100000 reached on ao2 object 0x20380b0 ( continuously for a while followed by a [Sep 1 20:36:46] WARNING[7761][C-0000770d]:
2004 Apr 20
1
Re: Auto Answering PSTN --> Asterisk using X 100PCard
worked came to one ring only now. Thank you very much. If I use TE410 or TE405 instead of X100P. do it make that first ring disappear? Shakil -----Original Message----- From: tony@softins.clara.co.uk [mailto:tony@softins.clara.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 12:27 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Auto Answering PSTN --> Asterisk using X100PCard In
2016 Nov 21
1
C6: latest util-linux-ng dependency on kernel?
In article <CAG2kNCyjsQZ2qW_8BBLp8BH_20=JgxoEYpn9BSwZhXg7_rHBbg at mail.gmail.com>, Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> > wrote: > > > I am just applying the latest C6 updates to a couple of KVM Linodes. > > It appears that the latest update of util-linux-ng has
2019 Jul 20
2
ARI libraries?
In article <301a2e78-d490-3805-e30f-41b668aac5c1 at sysnux.pf>, Jean-Denis Girard <jd.girard at sysnux.pf> wrote: > > Hi Tony, > > Le 20/07/2019 à 06:29, Tony Mountifield a écrit : > > Are there any other languages/libraries I should be considering? > > Same here, after years of AGI / AMI, I recently made my first project > using ARI on Asterisk-16. I love
2013 Jun 19
1
fail2ban with standard Apache log format?
I want to use fail2ban on CentOS 6 to monitor Apache with the standard default logfile format ("combined"). Has anyone here succeeded in doing so? The format has the IP at the start of the line, followed by two dashes (if no authentication) and THEN the timestamp. What I've read on the fail2ban wiki seems to say that the timestamp must ALWAYS be at the start of the line, followed by
2015 Jun 08
1
less for CentOS6 with POSIX regex?
On 06/09/2015 12:48 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > On 06/09/2015 12:33 AM, tony at softins.co.uk (Tony Mountifield) wrote: >> In article <ml1jnh$afr$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, >> Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: >>> When I started using CentOS 6 instead of CentOS 5, I discovered that >>> "less" no longer understood \<
2018 Jan 29
1
Mirroring centos.org
Ok, that sounds a little more elegant. Does that delete switch delete those files after download, or does it stop it from downloading at all? On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > In article <CANZsmmM6C_F+NuPdjd+mGDEXaJVcfc1bdhpWdESSbC2CR7Dz3 > g at mail.gmail.com>, > Felipe Westfields <felipe.westfields at gmail.com>
2020 Sep 27
0
Using CentOS 7 to attempt recovery of failed disk
@tonymountifield Does this still hold true? https://superuser.com/a/1075837 On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 7:21 AM Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > In article <E02FA554-9D6D-4E7D-8A78-5FBDE1DE939D at kicp.uchicago.edu>, > Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sep 26, 2020, at 8:05 AM, Jerry Geis
2008 Mar 04
1
Clustering Meetme over multiple boxes?
Has anyone here done any work on clustering Meetme conferences over multiple Asterisk boxes? The scenario I am thinking of is where there are two or more boxes connected to a set of PRIs that all answer to the same PSTN number, and where it's not possible to know in advance on which box a call would arrive. So it would be possible to have some calls on one box and some on another, that should
2014 Apr 22
1
Anyone used WatchGuard SIP ALG?
Has anyone here used Asterisk inside a WatchGuard firewall, talking via the WatchGuard SIP Application Layer Gateway to an outside SIP service? I have a customer doing just that, and I am 100% convinced there is a bug in the ALG regarding the media port number it inserts into the SDP when it rewrites it. However, either they or WatchGuard will not accept there is a bug, despite my very detailed
2015 Jun 04
1
Find out or log negotiated codec for SIP channel?
Hi, despite some searching I haven't found an answer to this question: Is there a way I can see in the log, or find out in the dialplan, what codec has been negotiated for a SIP channel? If possible, I'd like to do this in both Asterisk 11 and in an old 1.2 system. What I'm specifically trying to do is to determine historically the usage of the G.729 licences installed in a system,
2019 Oct 01
1
SquidGuard update in EPEL
In article <dafd6c5f-9676-c4da-8761-619d6f003525 at microlinux.fr>, Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > Le 01/10/2019 ?? 09:05, Liam O'Toole a ??crit??: > > [...] > > > > FWIW, the current release has squidguard 1.6 > > https://packages.debian.org/source/stable/squidguard > > And this all begs the question: who's flying this plane?