similar to: Earth (MARS) package with categorical predictors

Hello, useR:, Suppose I have two plots made by using contour() function, say Cont1 and Cont2 respectively. They have slightly difference because of the two slightly different data I used. I want to see the difference between them so I want to plot Cont2 on Cont1, are there any methods to plot it without filling the frame of Cont1 totally of Cont2. I mean, how I can integreate the two plots

All, I have been reading Dr. Harrell's excellent "Regression Modeling Strategies" book and trying out the exercises. I understand that contrast( ) is used to obtain contrasts between two variables for given levels of other nuisance variables; is there a way to use contrast( ) to obtain, for example, Scheffe confidence intervals / hypothesis tests for many post hoc contrasts at

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Kaylor, Andrew <andrew.kaylor at intel.com> wrote: > I like the way this sorts out with regard to funclet code generation. > It feels very natural for Windows EH, though obviously not as natural for > non-Windows targets and I think it is likely to block some optimizations > that are currently possible with those targets. > Right, it will

Hi there, the attached R function uses the SAS Integrated Object Model (IOM) and it can deal with SAS dates and long variable names. All you need to provide is the folder where the SAS data file is and the data file name without the extension. The function requires the rcom package. This is meant to be first cut...but improvements and suggestions are more than welcome! Gyula import.sas.data

Intel would like to contribute a patch to implement support for these Intel- and Microsoft -fp options. This message is to describe the options and request feedback from the community. -fp-model=[precise|strict|fast|except[-]] and -fp-speculation=[fast|strict|safe] This contribution would dovetail with the llvm patch "Teach the IRBuilder about constrained fadd and friends" which is

Hi, I have a dataset with 6 categorical variables. I have used this following code to make the variables u1-u6 ordered factors and this works well. cat1cat2 cat3 cat4 cat5 cat6 ? 0 ? ?? 1 ? ? 1????? 0 ??? 0? ?? 1 ? 1 ? ?? 1 ? ? 0 ? ?? 0 ? ? 0 ? ? 0 ....... .... ############ data<-read,table("example.txt") data <- as.data.frame(lapply(data, ordered)) ############ Now,

Hello all. I am inexperienced with R and am clumsily trying to work through it for specific multiple imputations Id like to run for my thesis.In running the MIX package, I keep getting an error message regarding the use of the prelim.mix command. Error in as.integer.default(list(alcohol = c(1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, : (list) object cannot be coerced to integer I cannot find the

Hi Reid, I've been working on the outlining code and have a prototype that produces what I want for a simple case. Now I'm thinking about the heuristics for recognizing the various logical pieces for C++ exception handling code and removing them once they’ve been cloned. I've been working from various comments you've made earlier in this thread, and I'd like to run something

I've started using lmPerm in order to perform regressions in R. The equation I want to fit has the form: out3 <- lmp(outcome ~ bin1 + bin2 + cont1 + cont2, perm="Exact") Where "outcome" is a non-normally distributed continuous variable, and bin* and cont are binary and continuous regressors (similarly, they are non-normally distributed). Each variable has a length of

Hello all, A few years ago, I added the inalloca feature to LLVM IR so that Clang could be C++ ABI compatible with MSVC on 32-bit x86. The feature works, but there is room for improvement. I recently took the time to write up a design using token values that will hopefully be better named and easier to work with and around. For the technical details of the proposal, I've written up the RFC

I was thinking about this last night, and I came up with a third alternative which I think looks very promising. It’s basically a re-working of the previous alternative to use the landingpad concept rather than arbitrary fake logic, but it uses a single landing pad for the entire function that mimics the logic of the personality function to dispatch unwinding calls and catch handlers. I believe

After a long tale of sorrow and woe, my colleagues and I stand here before you defeated. The Itanium EH representation is not amenable to implementing MSVC-compatible exceptions. We need a new representation that preserves information about how try-catch blocks are nested. WinEH background ------------------------------- Skip this if you already know a lot about Windows exceptions. On Windows,

*I am sorry for making you confused when I presented my problem.* *1. My steps for the test suit building:* (1) cd /home/qali/Src; * // This is my source directory for all application programs* (2) tar xzf llvm-2.8.tgz; * // now, the top directory of source tree is /home/qali/llvm-2.8* (3) cd llvm-2.8/projects (4) svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/trunk

On Jan 15, 2011, at 8:06 PM, Qingan Li wrote: > [qali at qali llvm-2.8-rev]$ find . -exec grep -n "LLVMCC_EMITIR_FLAG" ./ {} \; > ./projects/test-suite/Makefile.tests:47: -$(LCC) $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) $(LOPTFLAGS) $(X_TARGET_FLAGS) -S $< -o $@ $(LLVMCC_EMITIR_FLAG) > ./projects/test-suite/Makefile.tests:51: -$(LCXX) $(CPPFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) $(LOPTFLAGS) $(X_TARGET_FLAGS) -S

I am desperately trying to impute missing data using 'imp.mix' but always run into this yucky error message to which I cannot find the solution. It's the first time I am using mix and I'm trying really hard to understand, but there's just this one step I don't get...perhaps someone knows the answer? Thanks! Jens My code runs:

https://store.dataevolution.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=DT%2D7001 For $99 a nice little system with AMD Geode GX500 128Mb memory and 10Gb disk. Upgrade to 256Mb and off we go? Replace the hard drive with a Flash card, and run off a battery pack? Add Bluetooth (lower power draw that 802.11) and run IP over it to your desktop.... It does have ethernet, so a crossover cable works too.

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Qingan Li <ww345ww at gmail.com> Date: 2011/1/19 Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] About test suits Cont1 To: Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> *I am sorry for making you confused when I presented my problem.* *1. My steps for the test suit building:* (1) cd /home/qali/Src; * // This is my source directory for all application

Hi. Thanks for good program. I'm quite paranoid guy and dont beleave when some program offer me "use chroot = yes". Instead i jail program manually. I was at 3.0.9 and all was fine. Manual chroot only requires files dir, config and personal tmp. 3.1.1 now also want whole /proc only for /proc/self/fd/X instead just fd number. Whole /proc is serious security risk for me. Why? starce

*[qali at qali llvm-2.8-rev]$ find . -exec grep -n "LLVMCC_EMITIR_FLAG" ./ {} \;* ./projects/test-suite/Makefile.tests:47: -$(LCC) $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) $(LOPTFLAGS) $(X_TARGET_FLAGS) -S $< -o $@ $(LLVMCC_EMITIR_FLAG) ./projects/test-suite/Makefile.tests:51: -$(LCXX) $(CPPFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) $(LOPTFLAGS) $(X_TARGET_FLAGS) -S $< -o $@ $(LLVMCC_EMITIR_FLAG)

Hi Reid, Thanks for the input. You wrote: > The @_Z4testv.unwind.1 helper just calls ~Inner(), but not ~Outer. That’s actually intentional. The thing to keep in mind is that all of the landing pads are going to be effectively removed by the time the final object image is generated. They are just there to facilitate the table generation, and in the __CxxFrameHandler3 case they don’t mean