similar to: GlusterFS with NFS client hang up some times

Hi, I'm using glusterfs version 3.4.0 from gluster-epel[1]. Recently, I find out that there's a glusterfs version in base repo (3.4.0.36rhs). So, is it recommend to use that version instead of gluster-epel version? If yes, is there a guide to make the switch with no downtime? When run yum update glusterfs, I got the following error[2]. I found a guide[3]: > If you have replicated or

Configure fails at testing for openib - anyone an idea? Thanks Michaell configure:10034: checking whether to enable OpenIB gen2 support configure:10138: cp conftest.c build && make -d modules CC=gcc -f /home/mhebenst/lustre-2.3.0/build/Makefile LUSTRE_LINUX_CONFIG=/adm in/extra/linux-2.6.32-358.2.1.el6.x86_64.crt1/.config LINUXINCLUDE= -I/usr/local/ofed/3.5/src/compat-rdma-3.5/include

Hi, Can you tell me how to create R package in Windows, and give me an example that works ? Thanks. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Greetings! I''ve got a FreeBSD-based (FreeNAS) appliance running as an HVM DomU. Dom0 is Debian Squeeze on an AMD990 chipset system with IOMMU enabled. The DomU sees six physical drives: one of them is a USB stick that I''ve passed through in its entirety as a block device. The other five are SATA drives attached to a controller that I''ve handed to the DomU with PCI

I'm finding that my KVM images are not bootable after i reboot my host, and i've detailed my problem here.... http://serverfault.com/questions/589806/kvm-machines-unbootable-after-host-reboot Any thoughts on why? Here is a repaste of the problem: **************************************************************************************** Im finding that my KVM guests are unusable after i

Hi all- I corrupted my filesystem by not doing a RTFM first... I got an automated email that the process monitoring the SMART data from my hard drive detected a bad sector. Not thinking (or RTFMing), I did a fsck on my partition- which is the main partition. Now it appears that I've ruined the superblock. I am running Fedora Core 6. I am booting off the Fedora Core 6 Rescue CD in

Try setting autoport to yes in the graphics section of your xml... then libvirt will autosearch for a free port. You can get the port number by running 'ps aux | grep [vmname]' and look in the line for the port number. I gess you have another service running that is using port 5908... -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: libvirt-users-bounces@redhat.com

Hello, I have: CentOS4.1 x86_64 directly-attached Infortrend 9TB array QLogic HBA seen as sdb GPT label created in parted I want one single 9TB ext3 partition. I am experiencing crazy behavior from mke2fs / mkfs.ext3 (tried both). If I create partitions in parted up to approx 4,100,000 MB in parted, mkfs.ext3 works great. It lists the right number of blocks and creates a filesystem that fills

After saving a particular VM running WinXP, any attempt to resume it (even when no other VM's are running) generates the following error: olympus ~ # virsh restore /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/save/WinXP.save error: Failed to restore domain from /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/save/WinXP.save error: internal error: Failed to reserve port 5908 This started sometimes towards the end of last year with only the

Hi List, I have just two basic questions: 1) should I set for example dom0_mem=2048M at grub? 2) should I set xm mem-max 0 4000 ? irsh # dominfo 0 Id: 0 Name: Domain-0 UUID: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 OS Type: linux State: running CPU(s): 8 CPU time: 115.3s Max memory: 4096000 kB Used memory: 2075136 kB Autostart:

Hi Alan, Yes I have partitioned similar - with a swap. but as I mentioned slow! What command line do you use ? Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/nvme0n1p1 2048 102402047 51200000 83 Linux /dev/nvme0n1p2 102402048 110594047 4096000 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/nvme0n1p3 110594048 112642047 1024000 6 FAT16

How come am I not able to delete this "aquila_test/toto2" file from our "data" (see smb.conf below) directory but can delete it (different copy but same permissions and owners/groups) from our "home" (see smb.conf below) directory from a "Windows 2000" PC using samba ( we don`t have this problem when doing unix commands) File is on a SUN SunOS 5.8 server

This is CentOS-6x. I have cloned the HDD of a CentOS-6 system. I booted a host with that drive and received the following error: checking filesystems /dev/mapper/vg_voinet01-lv_root: clean, 128491/4096000 files, 1554114/16304000 blocks /dev/sda1: clean, 47/120016 files, 80115/512000 blocks /dev/mapper/vg_voinet01-lv_home: clean, 7429/204800 files, 90039/819200 blocks

Hi Ted and all, I have a couple of questions near the end of this message, but first I have to describe my problem in some detail. The power failure on Thursday did something evil to my ext3 file system (box running RH9+patches, ext3, /dev/md0, raid5 driver, 400GB f/s using 3x200GB IDE drives and one hot-spare). The f/s got corrupt badly and the symptoms are very similar to what Eddy described

Hi, folks. I've started getting these errors from rsync, and any help would be appreciated: >ERROR: out of memory in string_area_new buffer >rsync error: error allocating core memory buffers (code 22) at util.c(115) >ERROR: out of memory in string_area_new buffer >rsync error: error allocating core memory buffers (code 22) at util.c(115) >ERROR: out of memory in

1 GB should be enough to create a btrfs filesystem, even with 64K page size; hence, make the /dev/sda and /dev/sdb test devices smaller so there is less space taken during the test run. Followup of commit 8ffad75e5b610274a664a00f1f1186070b602e18 and commit 9e9b648770f9b8dbe8f280e4b5d1f80c4d689130. --- docs/guestfs-hacking.pod | 4 ++-- generator/actions.ml | 10 +++++-----

Hello, I come to you beacause i have something that i dont understand : i m using udev on a debian sid with 2.6.15.1 kernel. I have created an deprecated raid at /dev/md0 when i tried doing mkfs.ext3 /dev/md0 i have got : mke2fs 1.39-WIP (29-Mar-2006) Filesystem label= OS type: Linux Block size=4096 (log=2) Fragment size=4096 (log=2) 4643968 inodes, 9277344 blocks 463867 blocks (5.00%)

Hi Dongyang, Yan, When testing BTRFS with RAID 0 metadata on linux-3.3, we see discard ranges exceeding the end of the block device [1], potentially causing dataloss; when this occurs, filesystem writeback becomes catatonic due to continual resubmission. The reproducer is quite simple [2]. Hope this proves useful... Thanks, Daniel --- [1] attempt to access beyond end of device ram0: rw=129,

On 2013-08-29, at 7:48 PM, Richards, Paul Franklin wrote: > Strange behavior with fsck.ext3: how to remove a long orphaned inode list? > > After copying data over from one old RAID to another new RAID with rsync, the dump command would not complete because of filesystem errors on the new RAID. So I ran fsck.ext3 with the -y option and it would just run in an infinite loop restarting

Hi! I have problem making ext3 FS on new disk. When I run mke2fs, it stops and gives me: "File size limit exceeded". Is this known issue? I'm running linux-2.4.10 with ext3 patch, e2fsprogs-1.25 freshly compiled. Cheers, Vita Appended are outputs of following programs: bash /usr/src/linux/scripts/ver_linux /sbin/mke2fs -m0 -v -j /dev/sdb1 fdisk -l /dev/sdb strace