similar to: SAMBA running sluggish for Windows XP clients

This is happening on anything other than plain vanilla Dell servers. One R730, with dual Tesla cards, one R420, with a fibre card for a RAID device, it never switches root. All these systems have Xeons, not AMD CPUs. We've had this with every one of the 327 kernels. In addition, it seems to happen also with the 229.20.1; the 229.14.1 has no such problem. >From the rdsosreport: starting

I've just added the following to the CentOS bugtracker for CentOS-7 0009860. I admit to not being sure if it's the same issue, or a separate one, but this and other Dell servers - I *think* they're all R420's, but I could be wrong, just all do the same thing on boot. ***************** I've just updated a CentOS 7 server to the latest kernel, vmlinuz-3.10.0-327.4.5.el7.x86_64,

I just noticed when using 2.6.1, 2.6.2 (2008-02-08), 2.6.2pat (2008-02-21 r44582), and 2.6.2pat (2008-03-24 r44975) on my poor old Celeron D330 (2.6 GHz; 3.5 years old) running Windows XP, that the mouse cursor appears to be redrawn more sluggishly when the pointer is over R windows graphics devices than over the R console window or other applications' windows. The slowdown seems to start only

I have a Rootserver-> V-Server -> vpn-> samba connection. -1 GBit/s-Port: Granted 200 MBit/s: MAX 1 GBit/s: ... Using vpn direct I get the maximum speed of the local internet connection about 6MiB/s Using samba the maximum speed is about 2,6 MiB/s for a single download and twice 2.2MiB/s for a double download Upload is the same as my internet connection 1MiB/s I increased the speed

Hello All, We are using Dovecot 1.1.3 to serve IMAP on a pair of clustered Postfix servers which share a fiber array via the GFS clustered filesystem. This all works very well for the most part, with the exception that certain operations are so inefficient on GFS that they generate significant I/O load and hurt performance. We are using the Maildir format on disk. We're also using

> -----Original Message----- > From: Wes James [mailto:comptekki at me.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 7:04 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, 327 kernel still crashing > > > > On Jan 27, 2016, at 1:47 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > > > > I've just added the following to the CentOS bugtracker for CentOS-7 > >

Thanks to those who responded to my previous post. I have tried all suggestions and found no change. A quick review: Samba 3.0.11, OpenBSD 3.6, hub connected net, no routers or firewalls involved. An Audiotron music box and a WindowsXP machine in addition to the OpenBSD box. And the issues were the same when Samba 2.x and OBSD 3.4 were installed. Windows media player on the XP box plays

Working on the Dell R420 today, got most of it working, even the broadcom ethernet cards! However, I get the following when I reboot the system: Syncing disks, vnodes remaining...4 Sleeping thread (tid 100107, pid 9) owns a non-sleepable lock KDB: stack backtrace of thread 100107: sched_switch() at sched_switch+0x19f mi_switch() at mi_switch+0x208 sleepq_switch() at sleepq_switch+0xfc

Hi, this is my first pos here, please be lenient. My problem shuld be a FAQ and, in fact I found a lot of references googling around, but nothing could really solve my problem, so here I am. I have a Samba server: Very basic wheezy amd64 installation on a small VIRTUAL server (Xen). Only fancy thing is direct access to a couple of RAID1 (mirror) arrays where data is stored. I normally access

Hi Christian Am 11.05.20 um 19:17 schrieb Christian K?nig: > AGP is deprecated for 10+ years now and not used any more on modern hardware. > > Old hardware should continue to work in PCI mode. > > Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/Makefile | 4 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c | 7 -

Hi all, Where i want to arrive: 1) having two storage server replicating partition with DRBD 2) exporting via GNBD from the primary server the drbd with GFS2 3) inporting the GNBD on some nodes and mount it with GFS2 Assuming no logical error are done in the last points logic this is the situation: Server 1: LogVol09, DRDB configured as /dev/drbd0 replicated to Server 2. DRBD seems to work

hi guys, we're evaluating the available clustering options to get ctdb up and running for a highly available file server. we've set up both gluster and ocfs2 both on seperate 2 node setups. ocfs2 seems to provide better throughput and iops to samba clients than does gluster and that is comparing a single node server to a ctdb clustered 2 node server. problem with ocfs2 is that i've

Hi, all this days I'm testing a dovecot setup using lvs, director and a cluster email backend with two nodes using rhel5 and gfs2. In the two nodes of the email backend I configured mail location this way: mail_location = sdbox:/var/vmail/%d/%3n/%n/sdbox:INDEX=/var/indexes/%d/%3n/%n /var/vmail is shared clustered filesystem with GFS2 shared by node1 and node2 /var/indexes is a local

I have tried sending this before, but it did not appear to get through. Hello, When using gfs2 with quotas on a SAN that is providing storage to two clustered systems running CentOS6.5, one of the systems can crash. This crash appears to be caused when a user tries to add something to a SAN disk when they have exceeded their quota on that disk. Sometimes a stack trace is produced in

I am trying to use dovecot. I've got a GFS2 shared volume on two servers with dovecot running on both. On one server at a time, it works. The test I am trying is to attach two mail programs (MUA) via IMAPS (Thunderbird and Evolution as it happens). I've attached one mail program to each IMAPS server. I am trying to move emails around in one program (from folder to folder), and then

Hi. The short story... Rush job, never done clustered file systems before, vlan didn't support multicast. Thus I ended up with drbd working ok between the two servers but cman / gfs2 not working, resulting in what was meant to be a drbd primary/primary cluster being a primary/secondary cluster until the vlan could be fixed with gfs only mounted on the one server. I got the single server

Hi list ! We have a very busy webserver hosted in a clustered environment where the document root and data is on a GFS2 partition off a fiber-attached disk array. Now on busy moments, I can see in htop, nmon that there is a fair percentage of cpu that is waiting for I/O. In nmon, I can spot that the most busy block device correspond to our gfs2 partition where many times, it shows that

Hello, I'm deploing a new email cluster using Dovecot over GFS2. Actually I'm using courier over GFS. Actually I'm testing Dovecot with these parameters: mmap_disable = yes mail_fsync = always mail_nfs_storage = yes mail_nfs_index = yes lock_method = fcntl Are they correct? RedHat GFS support mmap, so is it better to enable it or leave it disabled? The documentation suggest the

Hi guys, my goal is to create a reliable virtualization environment using CentOS 6.4 and KVM, I've three nodes and a clustered GFS2. The enviroment is up and working, but I'm worry for the reliability, if I turn the network interface down on one node to simulate a crash (for example on the node "node6.blade"): 1) GFS2 hangs (processes go in D state) until node6.blade get

I'm trying to set up SAN-based shared storage in KVM, key word being "shared" across multiple KVM servers for a) live migration and b) clustering purposes. But it's surprisingly sparsely documented. For starters, what type of pool should I be using?