similar to: scriptaculous and DWR

Hi, I am also stuck up with DWR and Scriptaculous issues. So far any solution for this. please let me know if you have one regards _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs

Hello Everyone, Does anyone have any insight into the DWR library (http://getahead.ltd.uk/dwr/index)? I want to know the pros/cons of using DWR Vs Prototype/Scriptaculous libraries. I am a great fan of the prototype/scriptaculous combination and have been working with them for the last 3-4 months but for some reasons I have been asked to look into DWR. Due to it''s tight integration

I''m curious if anyone has used Scriptaculous and DWR in conjunction with each other. I''ve got a conversion coming up that I like Script.. for its drag-n-drop stuff and DWR for its Java integration. Jamie

Hi list, Is it possible to create a "dashboard" type application, like Netvibes.com, w/ script.aculo.us? _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs

Trying the accordion feature as offered at: http://wiki.script.aculo.us/scriptaculous/show/accordion+feature The objective is to remove the "jump" reported in the Rico accordion feature. My demo of the scriptaculous feature, however has a noticeable jump when tested if FireFox. and IE Win. See: http://www.jimdavis.org/accord3.html Have I implemented this incorrectly? Jim

I can''t get the inplace editor to do anything for me. The output appears as regular formated, unclickable text. Maybe I am missing something simple. 1. I just downloaded script.aculo.us <http://script.aculo.us> 1.5_rc3 and copied it to my javascript folder. 2. To set up a simple test, I created a new test page containing only the copied from demo1 from the script.aculo.us

Hello, I''m working with scriptaculous, and i''ve narrowed down a bug i''m having to the following code: http://rate.urbanpug.com I''m using the latest release (as of sending this mail) of scriptaculous. I''ve actually seen this bug before, and random tweaking fixed it. Unfortunately, i can''t figure it out this time. I''ve reduced the bug

Hi ! I'm getting an uncaught exception requiring the Scriptaculous libraries when everything says XHTML 1.0 Strict: class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base before_filter :set_content_type protected def set_content_type response.headers['Content-Type'] = 'application/xhtml+xml; charset=ISO-8859-1' end end <?xml version="1.0"

Isn''t the difference that the scriptaculous one only gets child nodes from the node you specify, whereas the prototype one gets all in the entire document? Still, it would be nice to just have the one, and let you pass in the document element if you wanted all of them. Just guessing, really. I haven''t looked at the code in question. Greg > -----Original Message----- >

I seem to recall the Effect.Appear setting the final opacity to 0.99 to avoid some bug on some browser; anyone remember the specifics? Seems like we should probably just conditionally check for the broken browser and set to 0.99 for only that one, otherwise leave it at 1.0, but I know I don''t have the full picture of why it was necessary or whether it still is. Greg

Hi, i am new to ajax and new to script.aculo.us. I created a blog, http://www.zorpal.com/blog/, using some of the script.aculo.us features and commands. My sites works great in firefox, which everyone should be using, but if you open it in IE it kills it. It only kills it after a script.aculo.us motion has been called and finishs it''s execution. i really like the layout and the visual

Hello, first of all, sorry for my English, I´m a Spanish student and I´m having some problems with script.aculo.us. These are the following: I have a XML file like this: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?> <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="barraNav.xsl"?> <barraNav> <boton>

I''m using TinyMCE[1], a popular javascript WYSIWYG html editor. The editor fails to work when I load Scriptaculous before it -- well depending on the browser. I can make my application load the javascript in a different order, but just in case it''s an issue in scriptaculous I thought I''d report. I have a few pages up -- I''d like to find out if anyone else

I''m not sure if this has been discussed, but is there a public tree control based on prototype/script.aculo.us? Thanks Jim _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs

I know that the prototype library was paired with Rails but I''m curious if anyone has used the ajax part (of the libraries) with java servlets? If so could you please point me to some examples or documentation. Cheers, Marty

What I have so far. In my main HTML: <script type="text/javascript" src="/javascripts/tiny_mce/tiny_mce_src.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> tinyMCE.init({ mode: "textareas", theme: ''advanced'', theme_advanced_toolbar_location: ''top'' }); ... </script> My Ajax form

Using older versions of prototype.js (1.4.0_rc2) and scriptaculous (1.5._rc4), I had a master table containg other tables (sections), each of which had rows. Using tbody''s as containers, I could drag the section tables up and down over the other section tables AND drag the rows in a section table up and down within that table or into the rows of the other section tables, all very

Is there a reason scriptaculous provides what appears to be a redundant function? The reason I''m asking is that it only seems to be used twice throughout all of scriptaculous, and it doesn''t appear to work properly (for some reason it''s returning the actual element, rather than an array with all of the elements) If there is no reason, I''ll modify it to use

I saw a Flash-based photo-flipper on TagWorld ( http://www.tagworld.com/thepostalservice) and thought it would be nice to do something similar in Scripaculous. Anyone interested in taking a shot at it? Since rotation isn''t supported in CSS, what I would imagine would be a z-ordered "stack" of DIVs, possibly of slightly different sizes or just x/y-offset a bit from each other.

In case anyone is interested, I just put together a demo using Sortable to preview Typo themes: http://www.dev411.com/typothemes/ Nice to see it in action. John _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs