similar to: extremely slow NFS performance under 6.x [SOLVED]

Thu Jul 7 14:47:23 UTC 2016, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Hi, folks, > > I installed the iscsi packages, and I *thought* that the first thing to > do was configure /etc/tgt/target.conf. Am I wrong? Did I have to > configure iSNS on the RAID appliance? One thing to make sure you have straight is Target vs. Initiator [2], for me it originally felt like the names were backwards.

Is there any chance the system-config-netboot* rpms upstream removed from CentOS6 could be provided in extras? The CentOS5 SRPM builds cleanly under CentOS6, and upstream's workaround is insufficient as it only covers diskless clients, not helpful if you need pxeos.

Hi I''ve just done a bit of re-jig of bits of the Wiki. I''ve added a FAQ page, suggestions welcome. I''m happy to write them up (assuming I know/can find the answers). Also, I''ve just been editing the Installation page. From the downloads page, it looks like only an old version of WxRuby (0.2.0) is available to Gentoo''s pkg mgr, but is it in fact

I am using dovecot and trying to make it compatible with my a BincIMAP installation. BincIMAP uses a scheme similar to Courier-IMAP, so I set up this default_mail_env: default_mail_env = maildir:~/Maildir And this namespace: namespace private { separator = . prefix = INBOX. inbox = yes } Which mostly works as expected, but I now see an "INBOX" subfolder of "INBOX" in

As promised, here''s what I did to get iSCSI root running under XenU under Debian 3.1 (Sarge): Be running linux 2.6 under XenU. Build XenU with SCSI disk support (I did them as modules) Get linux-iscsi 4.0.1.8 from http://sourceforge.net/projects/linux-iscsi/ Build it according to the instructions there (i found it a bit tricky) and install under your XenU Get iscsi-init 4.0.1 from

Hello all, I have run into a sticky problem with a failed device in an md array, and I asked about it on the linux raid mailing list, but since the problem may not be md-specific, I am hoping to find some insight here. (If you are on the MD list, and are seeing this twice, I humbly apologize.) The summary is that during a reshape of a raid6 on an up to date CentOS 6.3 box, one disk failed, and

Hello all! I try to boot the guest VM in native EL5.1 dom0. Kernel for guest domain I took from source compiled Xen distributions since native EL5.1 kernel being tired as guest did not see root partition at all. SELinux enforcing is disabled in the dom0: > [root@mbone ~]# getenforce > Permissive Configuration file for guest domain has parameter to disable selinux: > [root@mbone ~]#

Hi, I am a newbie in LLVM. I am very impressed with this forum and appreciate your help and time. I am trying to include llvm IR parser in my codebase, the way I wanna do is generate llvm's shared object (.so) file and use it in my project. So far I haven't been able to generate correct .so's. When I build a debug build with gmake (have llvm and clang in my sandbox), I get the

I was thinking about running Wine on Interix (the POSIX layer of Microsoft's Services for Unix). There are a few apparent unknows: Would Wine load the .dll.so's? Since Interix uses PE for it's native format (running on Windows, duh), Would Wine load the .dll.so's? Would it reject them being in PE format and having the 'POSIX Layer' attribute set, or could we hack on a

While considering statically linking against libc++ (and other runtime libraries from LLVM), I rebuilt LLVM 4.0 with -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF. There are still some .so's in llvm/lib, and only one of them seems to exist exclusively as a DSO (libLTO). There's also livLLVMLTO.a, but I doubt LTO is used after linking a binary so this just looks odd to an uninformed LLVM outside and not

We're forced to use Siteminder, by CA, who have no clue what they're doing in *nix. No packages, tarballs... Anyway, I'm trying clean up some stuff, and in /*/smwa/webagent/bin (all their binaries, including .so's, are in there, duh... I'm trying to set the .so's to lib_t. semanage -fcontext -a -t lib_t "/<elided>/smwa/webagent/bin(/.*).so" gives me the

Hello, I'm in the process of finalizing the spec for my new dovecot VM, and this is the last question I need to address... I've read until I'm just about decided on XFS, but I have no experience with it (been using reiserfs on my old box (@ 8 yrs old now), and never had a problem (knock on wood), but considering its current situation (little to no development support for reasons

Ran into a confusing situation today. When I mount an xfs filesystem on a server running centos 5.4 x86_64 with kernel 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5, the barrier/nobarrier mount option as displayed in /proc/mounts is always set to "nobarrier" Here's an example: [root at host ~]# mount -o nobarrier /dev/vg1/homexfs /mnt [root at host ~]# grep xfs /proc/mounts /dev/vg1/homexfs /mnt xfs

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:42 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Larry Martell wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:21 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: >>> Larry Martell wrote: >>>> We have 1 system ruining Centos7 that is the NFS server. There are 50 >>>> external machines that FTP files to this server fairly continuously. >>>>

> On May 13, 2018, at 9:24 AM, Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote: > > Not when I click on that link. > > Nor me, but what I get is actually https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1174799/how-to-make-execution-pause-sleep-wait-for-x-seconds-in-r note the number is *different* than 50314015 - the OPs posting Seems like a bug - perhaps in SO's server?

Hi,all I'm using ubuntu8.04 and I'm installing gold-plugin along with the document of that, After I built the binutils and LLVM with plugin enabling,and I also replace ld with ld-new which supports plugin,I tried to compile a hello world program by this: llvm-gcc -use-gold-plugin a.a b.o -o hello which is similar with the example in the document,it tells me that libLLVMgold.so can not

I whipped up a quick spec to package Zenoss' wmi client and noticed it creates a libasync_wmi_lib.so.0 and libasync_wmi_lib.so.0.0.1 that their python script would otherwise copy during its install routine (obviously I wrote a native rpm section for installation). Anyone know the naming convention associated with so's when they get compiled, what is the .0.1 extra file used for, they are

On 10/24/2016 04:51 AM, mark wrote: > Absolutely add nobarrier, and see what happens. Using "nobarrier" might increase overall write throughput, but it removes an important integrity feature, increasing the risk of filesystem corruption on power loss. I wouldn't recommend doing that unless your system is on a UPS, and you've tested and verified that it will perform an

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:21 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Larry Martell wrote: >> We have 1 system ruining Centos7 that is the NFS server. There are 50 >> external machines that FTP files to this server fairly continuously. >> >> We have another system running Centos6 that mounts the partition the files >> are FTP-ed to using NFS. > <snip>

On 13/05/2018 12:41 PM, Berry, Charles wrote: > > >> On May 13, 2018, at 9:24 AM, Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote: >> >> Not when I click on that link. >> >> > > Nor me, but what I get is actually > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1174799/how-to-make-execution-pause-sleep-wait-for-x-seconds-in-r > > note the