similar to: HVM crash system on AMD APU A8-6600K

My system reboots when I trying to start any HVM domU. This problem was described earlier: http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-08/msg01395.html My system is openSUSE 13.1 RC2 with Xen 4.3.0 My hardware is ASRock FM2A75 Pro4 AMD A8-6600K APU Gigabyte Radeon 7850 8 Gb DDR3 1600Mhz I have setup serial console and could provide logs your requested. Attached logs from xl dmesg,

Guys Is it possible to passtrough iGPU from AMD A10-7870K to kvm virtual machine? If so then how please? Thank you David

Hi. Red Hat is saying that AMD Liano A8 CPU's are not supported by RHEL/CentOS 6: https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/articles/65431 Is that true? What can I expect if I try to install CentOS 6.3 on PC with that CPU? -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS,

Hi, I have just upgraded my computer to Intel Core i5-4430 Quad Core @ 3.0 GHz (supports VT-d), ASRock B85M Pro4 micro-ATX LGA1150 motherboard (supports VT-d), 8 GB Kingston DDR3-1600 memory and Cooler Master Elite 311 ATX casing (all for SGD$501). I made my computer upgrade on Independence Day 4th July 2013. I have also flashed the UEFI BIOS of ASRock B85M Pro4 motherboard to version 1.50.

Hi, amdgpu + IOMMU + SME is now working for me on 5.7, yay! But, it is broken on torvalds master, boo. On boot, depending on which exact commit I test, it either hangs immediately (with built-in driver, before starting initramfs), displays some errors then hangs, or spams the screen with many amdgpu errors. I bisected the black screen hang to: commit dce8d6964ebdb333383bacf5e7ab8c27df151218

Hi, amdgpu + IOMMU + SME is now working for me on 5.7, yay! But, it is broken on torvalds master, boo. On boot, depending on which exact commit I test, it either hangs immediately (with built-in driver, before starting initramfs), displays some errors then hangs, or spams the screen with many amdgpu errors. I bisected the black screen hang to: commit dce8d6964ebdb333383bacf5e7ab8c27df151218

Hello all, I just installed CentOS 7.8 on ASRock B460M Pro4 board. CPU is i5-10400. The display device is inside the CPU and the max resolution is 4096x2160 for HDMI. But when I connect my small screen (max full HD), the display resolution is only 800x600. >From seeing some info here, I installed EPEL for yum, and inxi. The "inxi -G" command's output is like this :

Hello all, I just installed CentOS 7.8 on ASRock B460M Pro4 board. CPU is i5-10400. The display device is inside the CPU and the max resolution is 4096x2160 for HDMI. But when I connect my small screen (max full HD), the display resolution is only 800x600. >From seeing some info here, I installed EPEL for yum, and inxi. The "inxi -G" command's output is like this :

Hi Alex, On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 07:05:21PM -0400, Alex Xu (Hello71) wrote: > I am using an ASRock B450 Pro4 with Ryzen 1600 and ASUS RX 480. I don't > understand this code at all, but let me know what I can do to > troubleshoot. Does it boot without SME enabled? Regards, Joerg

Excerpts from Joerg Roedel's message of June 22, 2020 6:02 am: > Hi Alex, > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 07:05:21PM -0400, Alex Xu (Hello71) wrote: >> I am using an ASRock B450 Pro4 with Ryzen 1600 and ASUS RX 480. I don't >> understand this code at all, but let me know what I can do to >> troubleshoot. > > Does it boot without SME enabled? > >

My question is related to an earlier discussion on the list ( http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-03/msg01395.html). Is there any plan for implementing gang scheduling (of all vcpus of a domain) in xen? I see that gang scheduling is mentioned in almost all the latest talks about xen (posted on xen.org). It seems to me that gang scheduling would be desirable, specially if there

Turns out we used a misaligned long instruction near the end, and the shader was getting killed after writing R, A components. This has gone unnoticed since the remaining G, B outputs aren't actually used. --- src/nv50_accel.c | 5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/nv50_accel.c b/src/nv50_accel.c index 5fa539c..1218e18 100644 --- a/src/nv50_accel.c

Hi all, I want to compile the source code of Advanced Programming in the Unix Environment(APUE) 3rd edition, and I encountered some difficulties. After executing "make", I got this message: gcc -ansi -I../include -Wall -DLINUX -D_GNU_SOURCE barrier.c -o barrier -L../lib -lapue -pthread -lrt -lbsd /tmp/cc0gG99O.o: In function `thr_fn': barrier.c:(.text+0x6e): undefined reference to

On 5/10/2021 1:33 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > Package: src:linux > Version: 5.10.28-1 > Severity: normal > Tags: upstream > > Dear Maintainer, > > I have been using Xen's PCI and VGA passthrough feature since wheezy and jessie were the stable versions, and back then both Windows HVMs and Linux HVMs would function with the Intel Integrated Graphics Device (IGD), the

嬥堜桪巕偲怽偟傑偡丅 撍慠偺儊乕儖憲怣丄怽偟栿偛偞偄傑偣傫丅 僗億儞僒乕僒僀僩條傛傝擇恖偺彈惈偺徯夘埶棅傪庴偗傑偟偨偺偱丄 偛埬撪偝偣偰偔偩偝偄丅丅 堦愗椏嬥柍偟偺偛徯夘偲側傝傑偡丅 儊乕儖偺憲庴怣傪娷傔丄偳傟偩偗棙梡偟偰捀偄偰傕柍椏偱偡丅 姰慡柍椏偱偺偛徯夘偱偡偺偱憗婜掲傔愗傝偺応崌偑偛偞偄傑偡丅 傑偨丄掲傔愗傝偲側偭偨偲偒偼梊崘側偔彈惈偺曄峏傪偡傞応崌傕偛偞偄傑偡偑丄 偛梕幫偔偩偝偄丅 僋儕僢僋佀丂http://chestnut.happydeeds.com/a12/

On 2013-10-18 7:11 AM, Sebastian Reimers wrote: > Hello!, > > i've just compared the 1.0.3 release with the master branch > on a BeagleBone Black (AM335x 1GHz ARM Cortex-A8 with NEON > floating-point accelerator) and Arch Linux ARM. > > At the moment I dont no why, but I see that 1.1 is much slower > in encoding. Are there any default changes, that I missed and could

I wrote: > In a floating point build > it's enabled only at complexity setting 10 Sorry. I meant that in a _fixed_point_ build the new analysis code is enabled only at complexity setting 10. It's currently enabled for floating point builds at complexity 7 or higher. Both fixed and float builds default to complexity 9 in 1.1. -r

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote: > Just to clear things up... So 1.1 has some new analysis code that > increases the amount of CPU. When building as floating point (which you > appear to be doing, right?), the new code is enabled at complexity 7 and > up (opusenc defaults to complexity 10 IIRC). This is why you've been >

hi all I saw that llvm-2.7 support arm cortex-a8 now, but I didn't find how to cross build it. thank you all -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100505/976c140e/attachment.html>

hi all I use --enable-targets=arm configure LLVM, build it with Clang, but when I using Clang, it say: #clang -triple /root/a.c error: unable to create target: 'No available targets are compatible with this triple, see -version for the available targets.' 1 diagnostic generated. How can I use Clang generate code for ARM Cortex-A8? thank you -------------- next part