similar to: GlusterFS 3.4 Fuse client Performace

Hello, I'm running Asterisk on a CentOS 64-bit server. . Asterisk if I compile using the ./configure --libdir=/usr/lib64 instead of ./configure have a relative gain performace.? Has anyone done any comparison? Is there any way in the compilation or even in settings that I can improve the performace of the asterisk? tks Eduardo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hello! Our company have 2 sun 7110 with the following configuration: Primary: 7110 with 2 qc 1.9ghz HE opterons and 32GB ram 16 2.5" 10Krpm sas disc (2 system, 1 spare) a pool is configured from the rest so we have 13 active working discs in raidz-2 (called main) there is a sun J4200 jbod connected to this device with 12x750GB discs with 1 spare and 11active discs there is another pool

On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Carlos Garces <carlos.garces at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > I have some strange results on my test with nouveau drivers > > I'm using a old GeForce4 MX 4000 (NV18) with 128 MB. > > I have made 2 test. > > -The default configuration, using nomodeset without nouveau_vieux_dri.so > > $inxi -G > Graphics: Card: NVIDIA NV18

Hi forks: I've been testing SMB2 with samba 3.6.4 performance these days, and I find a weird benchmark that SMB2 write performance is slower than SMB1 in 10Gb ethernet network. Server ----------------------- Linux: Redhat Enterprise 6.1 x64 Kernel: 2.6.31 x86_64 Samba: 3.6.4 (almost using the default configuration) Network: Chelsio T4 T420-SO-CR 10GbE network adapter RAID: Adaptec 51645 RAID

Hi Xen Users, I''d like to run some performance tests with Xen. Are there some (sort of) standard test-cases or tooling? I''m thinking about using the Linux Test Project''s "Database Opensource Test Suite" (http://ltp.sourceforge.net) Does someone have any experience with this? Other recommendations? Thanks. Regards, Gábor

Hello, I have 2 dual CPU Xeon 3Ghz HT enabled Linux routers and each one of them serving 2 class C with pick traffic on router about 300Mbit full duplex 2 x Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82546GB Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 03) 1GB ram And 2 x Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5703 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) 1GB ram Both routers have about 600

Hello, I am interested in some management-performance issues: 1st Scenario: A management tool (for example a webbased one) has the following process: - write in database - read with script (for example perl) data from db and write conf files - reload asterisk I was reading around in the mailing lists and people say reloading is stable. Now this tool has to manage 1000 clients so the conf

Hi! I have some strange results on my test with nouveau drivers I'm using a old GeForce4 MX 4000 (NV18) with 128 MB. I have made 2 test. -The default configuration, using nomodeset without nouveau_vieux_dri.so $inxi -G Graphics: Card: NVIDIA NV18 [GeForce4 MX 4000] X.Org: 1.12.4 drivers: vesa,nouveau (unloaded: fbdev) Resolution: 1024x768 at 0.0hz GLX Renderer: N/A

I have noticed a significant performance degradation using merge in 2.9.1 relative to 2.8.1. Here is what I observed: N <- 100000 X <- data.frame(group=rep(12:1, each=N), mon=rep(rev(month.abb), each=N)) X$mon <- as.character(X$mon) Y <- data.frame(mon=month.abb, letter=letters[1:12]) Y$mon <- as.character(Y$mon) Z <- cbind(Y, group=1:12) system.time(Out

After update the system now I use: Kernel 3.9.2 x server 1.12.4 nouveau 1.0.7 the xorg config are at: http://pastebin.com/2LUxLiVs It's the one installed by my distro, without any modification I have made 2 test. Normal boot Xorg at http://pastebin.com/reZdAXEF GLX Renderer is detected as GLX "Mesa DRI nv18 x86/MMX+/3DNow!+/SSE GLX" Same configuration with nomodeset Xorg log

Dear gluster experts, We have encountered a severe performance issue related to quota feature of gluster. My underlying fs is lvm with xfs format. The problem is if quota is enabled the io performance is about 26MB/s but with quota disabled the io performance is 216MB/s. Any one known what's the problem? BTW I have reproduce it several times and it is related to quota indeed. Here's the

I've got an odd situation that I need some advise on. I have two computers that I am planning to use as a cluster. I initially started with some left over Compaq Presairos with 667MHz CPUs. I loaded CentOS 4.3 and later updated to 4.4. Things ran normally, albeit slowly. I had an opportunity to upgrade to a pair of IBM Netvistas with 2.26 GHz CPUs, I did this by transferring the

Has anyone else noticed a significant zfs performance deterioration when running recent opensolaris bits? My 32-bit / 768 MB Toshiba Tecra S1 notebook was able to do a full opensolaris release build in ~ 4 hours 45 minutes (gcc shadow compilation disabled; using an lzjb compressed zpool / zfs on a single notebook hdd p-ata drive). After upgrading to 2007-05-25 opensolaris release bits

Hello, Queries: 1 - what is the best RAID (0,1,5,10,50) for server running very, very VM instances ??? 2 - and config of stripes/element sizes (32, 64, 128, 256, etc, KB) ?? 3 - in the configuration of VM, exit one difference in performance between image file (disk:/) or LVM partition (phy:/) ??? any URL or docs for read about this theme ? mmm.. it is all for moment. thanks -- -- Victor

Hi, We've got a setup here with a samba server in front of a fibrechannel array. It's a pretty vanilla samba setup exporting an xfs filesystem. The box is an opteron 265 with 4G RAM and a QLogic QLA2312 HBA running SLES9. We can dd an 8G file to a share from a windows workstation in just over 2 minutes (about 65MB/s) and dd back in about 4 minutes. Local disk performance in the machine

Ok, related to the replys from Eric and Monty there are 3 possible solutions - 1. use lossless encoding like FLAC - 2. insert large chunks of silence between the wave sounds - 3. use completely seperate chained streams -> 1. Flac can't be used because of disk space and bandwidth limitations. -> 2. I also tried this variant but in that case my sounds don't start immediately

Hi, we are running samba 4.4 on two machines as file servers. Both are running a GFS (stornext). The storage is attached using 8G HBA. You can get up to 800MB/s local speed. We are exporting the shares using 2x1GB and 2x10G. However the clients are only getting 40-50MB/s. With samba3 I think we had up to 80-90MB/s. Using a 100MB/s link for the client we see 12-13MB/s (wire speed). Using

Hi, I have OpenSolaris on an Amd64 Asus-A8NE with 2gig of Rams and 4x320 gig sata drives in raidz1. With dd, I can write at quasi disk maximum speed of 80meg each for a total of 250meg/s if I have no Xsession at all (only console tty). But as soon as I have an Xsession running, the write speed drops to about 120MB/s. Its even worse if I have a VBoxHeadless running with an idle win2k3 inside. It

I hope that someone has had a similar trouble and will be able to help us : We , have installed the R package in a Digital Workstation with 500Mb of RAM memory, running under Unix operating system. The package works fine but when we try to start the program with more than 120Mb, (vsize - --120M) the workstation refuses to allocate this memory. The message that we get is: Fatal error:

Hi all, I'm trying to use Microsoft's ImageX with Wine as part of a small Linux image to install Windows disk images. It works great for a 120Mb file, however when I try it on a 2.3Gb file, it fails with "Invalid data". The tool is designed for dealing with large files, so it looks like a problem in Wine. I reran it with +server,+relay which included the following in the