similar to: Unable to mount partition

Unfortunately my laptop deadlocks from time to time, and too often it triggers this bug in btrfs which is quite hard to recover from. The bigger problem is that all the user sees (if anything) is seemingly unrelated info, namely, "RIP: btrfs_num_copies+0x42/0x0b" or somesuch http://marc.merlins.org/tmp/btrfs_num_copies.jpg It''s only if you have serial console, or netconsole,

I asked the debian maintainer to add btrfs-zero-log to the initramfs since I unfortunately have to use it from time to time. It still fixes the problem for me when btrfs won''t mount, but it errors at the end. See screenshot Marc -- "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R. Microsoft is to operating systems ....

So I''m writing my (dis)adventure with btrfs here hoping to help the developers or someone with similar problems. I had a btrfs filesystem at work, using two 1TB disks, raid1 for both data and metadata. A week ago one of the two disks start having hundreds of relocated sectors, so I decide to change it. I remove the failing disk, mount with -o degraded and every works fine. The day later

Hi, I have setup a RAID1 using 3 devices (500G each) on separate disks. After removing one disk physically the filesystem cannot be mounted in degraded nor in recovery mode. When putting the disk back in the filesystem can be mounted without errors. I did a cold-swap (powercycle after removal/insertion of the disk). Here are the details: - latest kernel 3.2.1 and btrfs-tools on xubuntu

Hi all, I just had a panic with dovecot 1.1.6, two days after replacing 1.0.15 with it in production. Here are the logs immediately preceding the panic, I think they're related. It seems the user connected simultaneously from two different clients, from his own computer and a webmail running on the server, then manipulated mail folders on one side, and logged out. The panic occurred 3

Hi list, I am using kernel 3.9.0, btrfs-progs 0.20-rc1-253-g7854c8b. I have a three disk array of level single: # btrfs fi sh Label: none uuid: 2e905f8f-e525-4114-afa6-cce48f77b629 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 3.80TB devid 1 size 2.73TB used 2.25TB path /dev/sdd devid 2 size 2.73TB used 1.55TB path /dev/sdc devid 3 size 2.73TB used 0.00 path /dev/sdb

Hello! I''m using ArchLinux with kernel Linux horus 3.10.5-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT. Mounting and unmounting takes a long time: # time mount -v /mnt/Archiv mount: /dev/sde1 mounted on /mnt/Archiv. mount -v /mnt/Archiv 0,00s user 0,16s system 1% cpu 9,493 total # sync && time umount -v /mnt/Archiv umount: /mnt/Archiv (/dev/sdd1) unmounted umount -v /mnt/Archiv 0,00s user

Hi, The following patches add support for ext4 and btrfs to PV-GRUB. These patches are taken nearly verbatim from those provided by Fedora and Gentoo. We''ve been using these patches for the PV-GRUB images available in EC2 for some time now with no problems. Changes from v1: - Makefile has been changed to check the exit code from patch - The btrfs patch has been rebased to apply

Greetings! I''m testing raid6, and recently added two drives. I haven''t been able to properly resume a balance operation: the number of total chunks is always too low. It seems that the balance starts and pauses properly, but always resumes with ~7 chunks. Here''s an example: vendikar tim # uname -r 3.10.0-031000rc4-generic vendikar tim # btrfs fi sho Label:

Hello, on a fs with 4 disks, raid 10 for data, one drive was failing and has been removed. After reboot and ''mount -o degraded...'', the fs looks full, even though before removal of the failed device it was almost 80% free. root@fs0:~# df -h /mnt/b Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sde 11T 2.5T 41M 100% /mnt/b root@fs0:~# btrfs fi df /mnt/b Data,

Hiya, Recently, a btrfs file system of mine started to behave very poorly with some btrfs kernel tasks taking 100% of CPU time. # btrfs fi show /dev/sdb Label: none uuid: b3ce8b16-970e-4ba8-b9d2-4c7de270d0f1 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 4.25TB devid 2 size 2.73TB used 1.52TB path /dev/sdc devid 1 size 2.70TB used 1.49TB path /dev/sda4 devid 3 size

(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the bugzilla web interface). On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:20:20 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29302 > > Summary: Null pointer dereference with large max_sectors_kb > Product: IO/Storage > Version: 2.5 > Kernel

Hi, My company is testing btrfs (kernel 2.6.38) on a slave MySQL database server with a 195Gb filesystem (of which about 123Gb is used). So far, we''re quite impressed with the performance. Our database loads are high, and if filesystem performance wasn''t good, MySQL replication wouldn''t be able to keep up and the slave latency would begin to climb. This though, is

Hello, I habe the problems described in here https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Gotchas: Files with a lot of random writes can become heavily fragmented (10000+ extents) causing trashing on HDDs and excessive multi-second spikes of CPU load on systems with an SSD or large amount a RAM. On servers and workstations this affects databases and virtual machine images. The nodatacow mount option

Hallo, "never change a running system" ... For some months I run btrfs unter kernel 3.2.5 and 3.2.9, without problems. Yesterday I compiled kernel 3.3.4, and this morning I started the machine with this kernel. There may be some ugly problems. Copying something into the btrfs "directory" worked well for some files, and then I got error messages (I''ve not

I have written a directdraw program in dx7 that i can get working under wine. I have now written a simple directx8 3d program that works under windows but i am getting these wierd errors under wine. this is the output from wine -debugmsg +module pro666 I think it is a problem with the two libraries d3d8.lib and d3dx8.lib as I can see errors there. Also I notice that these are the two libraries

Hello all, After setting up a Solaris 10 machine with ZFS as the new NFS server, I''m stumped by some serious performance problems. Here are the (admittedly long) details (also noted at http://www.netmeister.org/blog/): The machine in question is a dual-amd64 box with 2GB RAM and two broadcom gigabit NICs. The OS is Solaris 10 6/06 and the filesystem consists of a single zpool stripe

Hallo, linux-btrfs, First I create an array of 2 disks with mkfs.btrfs -d raid0 -m raid1 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdd1 and mount it at /srv/MM. Then I fill it with about 1,6 TByte. And then I add /dev/sde1 via btrfs device add /dev/sde1 /srv/MM btrfs filesystem balance /srv/MM (it run about 20 hours) Then I work on it, copy some new files, delete some old files - all works well. Only df

Banging my head against a Seagate 3TB USB3 drive. Its marketing name is: Seagate Expansion 3 TB USB 3.0 Desktop External Hard Drive STAY3000102 format(1M) shows it identify itself as: Seagate-External-SG11-2.73TB Under both Solaris 10 and Solaris 11x, I receive the evil message: | I/O request is not aligned with 4096 disk sector size. | It is handled through Read Modify Write but the performance