similar to: btrfs-zero-log (v 0.20-rc1) corrupted double linked list.

Unfortunately my laptop deadlocks from time to time, and too often it triggers this bug in btrfs which is quite hard to recover from. The bigger problem is that all the user sees (if anything) is seemingly unrelated info, namely, "RIP: btrfs_num_copies+0x42/0x0b" or somesuch http://marc.merlins.org/tmp/btrfs_num_copies.jpg It''s only if you have serial console, or netconsole,

Is this useful to anyone? Got this after a crash/reboot: if (block_rsv) { WARN_ON(block_rsv->size > 0); <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< btrfs_free_block_rsv(root, block_rsv); } ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2165 btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0xcb/0xdf() Hardware name: 2429A78 Modules linked in:

I just setup a new SSD with my laptop root filesystem, and at the time I though, "eh, I''ll just use zlib compression during the first copy, and then switch to lzo afterwards to maintain write speed when I''m using the laptop after the copy and reboot". Now, I rebooted with the new ssd and zlib compressed rootfs, and it seemed to boot slower than it did before with the

Since I heard absolutely nothing on my last but and corruption report, I''m not sure if they are useful or wanted (please let me know). The last thing I''ve seen with 3.4.4 is this: kernel: [116130.309667] btrfs: unlinked 25 orphans kernel: [117951.440823] BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:ffff8801e2a4c080 idx:1 val:-1 kernel: [117951.440832] BUG: Bad rss-counter state

I don't know if this has been requested before, but I would really like for rsync to compute an md5sum for each file at the source and destination (with a flag turned off by default of course), and it would realize that I renamed files at the source by noticing a matching md5sum between different filenames It would then rename the destination instead of deleting it and resending the entire

Hi everybody, I am using btrfs as my main fs for some time now, but I am experiencing severe performance drawbacks. I can''t qualify the circumstances, but sometimes during disc access the whole system freezes for some time. Maybe somebody could suggest some general things I could try to search for the problem? Thanks in advance, Florian --- Some background information: $ mount |

Hi, I was hoping to use wine to run one of those stupid windows binaries that generate a floppy (at least IBM has a clue, and also offers the raw floppy image for dd-ing) In this case, the culprit is seagate's seatools: http://www.seagate.com/support/seatools/ I installed wine under debian unstable (Version: 0.0.20010824-1) and when I run the windows binary under wine, it runs but

Here is what my data looks like: source:~# ls -ld /data /data/etc2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2010-06-03 23:32 /data -> /export/hda3 -rw-r--r-- 1 produser prod 4 2010-06-15 17:30 /data/etc2 destination:/# ls -l /data lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2010-06-15 18:36 /data -> /export/hda3 Let's start with an ancient rsync: source:~# rsync-broken --version rsync version 2.4.6 protocol

Is it expected that running btrfsck more than once will keep reporting errors? Below is the end of a btrfsck output when run the second time. backpointer mismatch on [111942471680 32768] owner ref check failed [111942471680 32768] ref mismatch on [111942504448 40960] extent item 1, found 0 Incorrect local backref count on 111942504448 root 5 owner 160739 offset 3440640 found 0 wanted 1 back

Brilliant, thanks very much!! Works fine. Dan On 6 Dec 2012, at 18:25, arun kirshna [via R] wrote: > Hi, > Your question is not very clear. I hope you are not looking for the subset option in summary(lm()). > If you want just the summary(), then use '&' or '|' > For e.g. > dat1<-read.table(text=" > opcorn Oilamt Batch Yield >

Hi! I've written an article on setting up cryptroot on CentOS: http://www.msquared.id.au/articles/cryptroot I'd like to create links to it from a few places in the wiki. For example: * http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos Create a 'security' heading and link to either my article or a page on the wiki that links to my article * http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops

My kernel crashed for some other reason, and now I can''t mount my btrfs filesystem. I don''t care about the data, it''s backed up. I''ll compile a 3.5 kernel, but is there any info you''d like off that filesystem to see why btrfs is crashing on mount? Marc [ 313.152857] device label btrfs_pool1 devid 1 transid 20769 /dev/mapper/disk1 [ 313.171318]

Glück Auf! I know its been discussed more then ones, but as a user I really would like to see the patch for allowing this in the kernel. Some users tested this patch successfully for weeks or months in 2 or 3 kernel versions since then, true? I''d say by creating a snapshot, it''s nothing else in the end. More then one file or tree sharing the same data on disc, or am I wrong?

Hi, I use btrfs for my /home drive. It''s a separate drive with just a single partition. I upgraded to ubuntu 13.10 (beta) a few weeks ago, without any real trouble. But I did have too many issues (not with the drive or btrfs, though) so I decided to do a fresh install. The new install failed a few times, so I made another startup usb drive with another program and that one worked fine.

mailing list subscription and C/R system mail does not harmonize! Warren - whoever you are - please subscribe with a mail address which accepts delivery without such nasty bounces! (Got the bounce instantly to my last reply to "Error when starting apache".) Alexander -----Weitergeleitete Nachricht----- > From: centos.5.warren at recursor.net > To: ad+lists at uni-x.org >

On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 01:51:19AM +0200, Karol Herbst wrote: > oh, I somehow missed that "disp ctor failed" message. I think that > might explain why things are a bit hanging. From the top of my head I > am not sure if that's something known or something new. But just in > case I CCed Lyude and Ben. And I think booting with > nouveau.debug=disp=trace could already

On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 09:14:03PM +0200, Karol Herbst wrote: > > - changes in the nouveau driver. Mika told me the PCIe regression > > "pcieport 0000:00:01.0: PME: Spurious native interrupt!" is supposed > > to be fixed in 5.8, but I still get a 4mn hang or so during boot and > > with 5.8, removing the USB key, didn't help make the boot faster >

Every post I do to this mailinglist is followed by a bounce message from "centos.5.warren at recursor.net". I have no clue why this is being send to me, afaics some IP address is being blacklisted but I am not related to it. Am I the only one who gets this and can we remove this person from the mailinglist ? Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/

Hello, This is the second attempt to bring in cross subvolume reflinks into btrfs. The first attempt was NAKed due to missing vfs mount checks and a clear description of what btrfs subvolumes are and probably also why cross subvolume reflinks are ok in the case of btrfs. This version of the patch comes from David and is in SUSE kernels since a long time, so it is tested and working. The patch

Ok, I have an update to this problem. I added the nouveau list because I can't quite tell if the issue is: - the PCIe changes that went in 5.6 I think (or 5.5?), referenced below - a new issue with thunderbold on thinkpad P73, that seems to be triggered if I have a USB-C yubikey in the port. With 5.7, my issues went away if I removed the USB key during boot, showing an interaction