similar to: [PATCH 1/7] xen: vNUMA support for PV guests

On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 02:34:37PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2020/6/25 ??9:57, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > These patches are not ready to be merged because I was unable to measure a > > performance improvement. I'm publishing them so they are archived in case > > someone picks up this work again in the future. > > > > The goal of these patches is to

On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 02:34:37PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2020/6/25 ??9:57, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > These patches are not ready to be merged because I was unable to measure a > > performance improvement. I'm publishing them so they are archived in case > > someone picks up this work again in the future. > > > > The goal of these patches is to

These patches are not ready to be merged because I was unable to measure a performance improvement. I'm publishing them so they are archived in case someone picks up this work again in the future. The goal of these patches is to allocate virtqueues and driver state from the device's NUMA node for optimal memory access latency. Only guests with a vNUMA topology and virtio devices spread

These patches are not ready to be merged because I was unable to measure a performance improvement. I'm publishing them so they are archived in case someone picks up this work again in the future. The goal of these patches is to allocate virtqueues and driver state from the device's NUMA node for optimal memory access latency. Only guests with a vNUMA topology and virtio devices spread

Enables numa if vnuma topology hypercall is supported and it is domU. Signed-off-by: Elena Ufimtseva <ufimtseva@gmail.com> --- arch/x86/xen/setup.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c index 68c054f..0aab799 100644 --- a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c +++ b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ #include

On 2020/6/25 ??9:57, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > These patches are not ready to be merged because I was unable to measure a > performance improvement. I'm publishing them so they are archived in case > someone picks up this work again in the future. > > The goal of these patches is to allocate virtqueues and driver state from the > device's NUMA node for optimal memory

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:26:46AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 02:34:37PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > On 2020/6/25 ??9:57, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > These patches are not ready to be merged because I was unable to measure a > > > performance improvement. I'm publishing them so they are archived in case > > > someone

We don’t preserve the NUMA properties of the VM across the migration. Just disable the migration for now. Also, setting disable_migrate doesn’t seem to stop one from actually migrating a VM. So, this patch is only for documentation. -dulloor Signed-off-by : Dulloor <dulloor@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/michael/my_cvs/wine-cvs/wine/dlls/dpnhpast' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/michael/my_cvs/wine-cvs/wine/dlls/dsound' gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -D__WINESRC__ -Wall -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -gstabs+ -Wpointer-arith -g -O2 -o sound3d. o sound3d.c

> On 12/08/2016 08:45 PM, Li, Liang Z wrote: > > What's the conclusion of your discussion? It seems you want some > > statistic before deciding whether to ripping the bitmap from the ABI, > > am I right? > > I think Andrea and David feel pretty strongly that we should remove the > bitmap, unless we have some data to support keeping it. I don't feel as >

> On 12/08/2016 08:45 PM, Li, Liang Z wrote: > > What's the conclusion of your discussion? It seems you want some > > statistic before deciding whether to ripping the bitmap from the ABI, > > am I right? > > I think Andrea and David feel pretty strongly that we should remove the > bitmap, unless we have some data to support keeping it. I don't feel as >

Hello, On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 05:35:45AM +0000, Li, Liang Z wrote: > > On 12/08/2016 08:45 PM, Li, Liang Z wrote: > > > What's the conclusion of your discussion? It seems you want some > > > statistic before deciding whether to ripping the bitmap from the ABI, > > > am I right? > > > > I think Andrea and David feel pretty strongly that we should