similar to: Antw: Xen-users Digest, Vol 104, Issue 18

The Xen Project Newsletter is a quick read which captures the highlights for the past month. If you don''t have time to visit the Xen websites regularly, the newsletter helps keep you in touch with what''s going on. The August edition of the #XenProject newsletter comes out later today. To get your copy, go to http://xenproject.org/subscribe.html and sign up. Russ Pavlicek Xen

From the Questions section of the XenProject.org site: Tony writes, "Does VGA Passthrough support Intel Iris Pro GT3e?" If anyone knows, you can send the reply to me and I will crosspost, or you can answer directly on the XenProject.org site. Many thanks, Russ Pavlicek Xen Project Evangelist

Over in the XenProject.org Q&A system, there is a question about networking. I won''t attempt reproduce it here, since it includes a nice color diagram and pieces of configuration files (it''s really one of the most detailed technical questions I''ve seen in a while). The question can be found here:

Since the folks on this list work with integrating Xen Project on CentOS, we'd like you to be aware of the upcoming Xen Project 4.5 RC2 Test Day. This Thursday, November 13, is our second Test Day for the 4.5 release cycle. Release Candidate 2 is now available for assessment. Information about testing this release can be found here:

Folks near New York City may want to come hear Johnny Hughes talk about Xen4CentOS and the Virtualization SIG next Monday at the Xen Project User Summit. Details here: http://blog.xenproject.org/index.php/2014/09/05/save-50-learn-about-the-next-wave-of-virtualization-at-xen-project-user-summit-sept-15-in-new-york-city/ Hope to see some of you next Monday! Russ Pavlicek Xen Project User Summit

Dylan,     Thank you for your advice.      What I would really like to do is to be able to compile Xen from source.  If I can''t I guess I can use  a distro version. Shane -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Xen without the X Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 15:32:18 -0700 From: Dylan Martin To: Shane D. Johnson

Saw this post from Major Hayden of Rackspace: http://major.io/2013/06/02/installing-the-xen-hypervisor-on-fedora-19/ It''s good to see posts like this "in the wild" (i.e., originating from a non-XenProject site). Russ _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-users

On 21.08.20 12:34, David Hildenbrand wrote: > Let's reuse the new mechanism to merge system ram resources below the > root. We are the only one hotplugging system ram (e.g., DIMMs don't apply), > so this is safe to be used. > > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko at suse.com> > Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky

Let's reuse the new mechanism to merge system ram resources below the root. We are the only one hotplugging system ram (e.g., DIMMs don't apply), so this is safe to be used. Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko at suse.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky at oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com> Cc: Stefano

Let's try to merge system ram resources we add, to minimize the number of resources in /proc/iomem. We don't care about the boundaries of individual chunks we added. Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko at suse.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky at oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com> Cc: Stefano Stabellini

This information will be mirrored on the Xen 4.4 Roadmap wiki page: http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Roadmap/4.4 We''re nearly to the completion of the code freeze, scheduled for tomorrow. After the code freeze, only bug fixes and features marked as "blockers" will be considered. At the moment, the only feature considered a blocker is experimental PVH dom0 support. In early RCs,

flight 13460 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/13460/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-pv 18 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 13459 test-amd64-amd64-pv 18 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 13459 test-amd64-i386-xl 18

Hi, I am following http://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/misc/vtpm.txt, but I''m having some problems when I try to start vtpmmgr-stubdom I''m using Xen 4.3 on Ubuntu 12.04 and I have a physical TPM. The config file for vTPM manager is: kernel="/usr/local/lib/xen/boot/vtpmmgr-stubdom.gz" memory=16 disk=["file:/var/vtpmmgr-stubdom.img,hda,w"]

On 31.08.20 11:35, Pankaj Gupta wrote: >> Some add_memory*() users add memory in small, contiguous memory blocks. >> Examples include virtio-mem, hyper-v balloon, and the XEN balloon. >> >> This can quickly result in a lot of memory resources, whereby the actual >> resource boundaries are not of interest (e.g., it might be relevant for >> DIMMs, exposed via

Hi, I am following http://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/misc/vtpm.txt, but I''m having some problems when I try to start vtpmmgr-stubdom I''m using Xen 4.3 on Ubuntu 12.04 and I have a physical TPM. The config file for vTPM manager is: kernel="/usr/local/lib/xen/boot/vtpmmgr-stubdom.gz" memory=16 disk=["file:/var/vtpmmgr-stubdom.img,hda,w"]

On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 05:11:49PM +0100, Roger Pau Monn? wrote: > Hello, > > I''ve yet updated the PVH work one more time, regarding some comments > from emaste in order to try to make this work easier to merge with the > UEFI changes. In this regard, the parse_memmap hook now fetches and > parses the memmap, so UEFI can define it''s own hook and do the fetching

flight 8091 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/8091/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking: test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 12 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs. 8071 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking, including regressions (tests previously passed) regarded as allowable: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9

flight 8285 xen-4.1-testing real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/8285/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking: test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 3 host-install(3) broken build-i386-oldkern 2 host-install(2) broken test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 3 host-install(3) broken

flight 8273 xen-4.1-testing real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/8273/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking: build-amd64 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 8257 build-amd64-pvops 4 kernel-build fail REGR. vs. 8257 build-amd64-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 8257

# HG changeset patch # User Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@entel.upc.edu> # Date 1326454799 -3600 # Node ID 58c924a72ab7af658a888ff39411229a9e6a12f6 # Parent 887a3229fd7a50c04981e29709bc7210dafef38f libxl: fix parse_backend_path and device_backend_path to be mutual Currently if libxl__parse_backend_path is used and then you try to get the original path again with libxl__device_backend_path the