similar to: Plugin issue with update from 2.0.19 to 2.1.17

Hi Timo... It's happens some strange issue with my maildir using NFS. If i use a Local Hard disk, i don't get any of this messages about memory error. Jan 12 10:57:50 brc dovecot: imap(alex at exemplo.com.br): Error: opendir(/storage/nfs/3/emexis/messages/ exemplo.com.br/alex/Maildir/.Drafts/new) failed: Cannot allocate memory Jan 12 10:57:51 brc last message repeated 4 times Jan 12

Hi Timo, I Trying to integrate my antispam with dovecot, using the imap folder to do certain actions. I Do almost every thing, but i have some problems saving the message. Explaining this function, i try to use a imap folder like a "collector folder", the user append a message from outside (ie another imap or pop message) to this folder, and i don't want to copy this message, i

Hello, I use a Suse 11.0 as a Samba 3.2 PDC. The clients run XP SP3. I have upgraded a few weeks ago from Suse 10.3 and now all files tranfer that I do - for example, downloading a file using a web browser - it leaves a trash file named "transferd-file:Zone.Identifier" or "tranferd-file:encryptable". The odd thing is that from Windows I can`t read/write/delete these files.

Hi, Tim Not even one ocurrence of "wins support" on my smb.conf -----Mensagem original----- De: Tim Kelley [mailto:tpk@r00tserverz.net] Enviada em: s?bado, 18 de outubro de 2003 11:09 Para: Reinaldo Brand?o Gomes Cc: samba@samba.org Assunto: Re: [Samba] Nmbd in a infinite loop, doing nothing and sucking 99%CPU (really) On Saturday 18 October 2003 9:03 am, Reinaldo Brand?o Gomes

Single DC? If a single DC then there should not be any replication issues - that would only be between domain controllers and the event logs would indicate that.   I have 2 Windows DC's with a mix of Samba member servers. As far as I know, the domain member does not need client NTLM auth to be enabled to talk to the DC but I am not 100% sure.  You may want to try reenabling it and

Whenever a client uses kerberos as authentication, it succeeds. Whenever a client uses NTLM as authentication, it fails (logs bellow) since SSSD can't support NTLM. Thus my question: what can I do to prevent NTLM from being used?? [2018/10/09 17:49:29.507046,  2] ../source3/auth/auth.c:332(auth_check_ntlm_password)  check_ntlm_password:  Authentication for user [MYUSER] -> [MYUSER] FAILED

The domain controler is Windows. The file Server is Linux/Samba. The clients are Windows. I've tested the access on a dozen different windows machines. Three of them used NTLM and failed. All the others used kerberos and succeeded. They're all in the same network, same domain. Maybe it's the windows version? But they're all Window 8 or 10, not a great deal of a difference between

I Build a plugin, that do some stuffs with a email. To get the input istream, i use the "get_stream" function, like zlib does. I create a concat_stream, with the full_input[3]; struct istream *full_input[3]; //this like zlib input = imail->data.stream; //first input, using the input full_input[0] = i_stream_create_header_filter(input, HEADER_FILTER_EXCLUDE | HEADER_FILTER_NO_CR,

Forgive me if I have misundertood your words, but what I want is to prevent Samba from accepting NTLM(v1, v2, SSP, or whatever) and forwarding it, since SSSD does not support it. I am not trying to get SSSD to support any kind of NTLM. So, this would be a Samba issue, not SSSD's. Isn't that correct? Putting it in another words: what can I do (preferrably on the Samba server) to prevent

--- In english --- Hello! I am to implement a new architecture of the network in my company but I do not know right where to start ... need help! Currently 90% of my servers are virtual machines under Xen. I have many valid IP networks and all Hypervisors are configured in bridge mode, to simplify. We have 3 VMWare ESX Hypervisor also in bridge mode. Some networks are exclusive to certain

Hello, My problem is that since last Sunday, 6 ultra 10, running solaris 7 stopped having samba working. Those machine are on a client site, a big mining idustry. SO, all the reports are generated over this data base, that needs to be available. The nmbd process looks like being in a loop, doing nothing and consuming 99%CPU. I have tried to create a log, using the nmbd -l /var/log/samba.log

Hi, People WE are having this problem with nmbd & smbd. The Process, once started goes by 99%CPU time and does nothing. For example, if I started nmbd with the option -l /usr/local/samba/log.nmbd, no log is created. The smb.conf was not modified over the last 8 years. The OS is solaris 7, and we have mainly windows clients. But doing one test with smbclient from another sun running

Hello, I''m starting at the RR, and I''m trying to use google charts to generate some graphs in a single plugin in rails. But I''m testing the samples that are giving errors. I think it must be configuration error. Someone who has used google charts on rails help me? Since already thank you! Juliana. =================================================================

This issue right here told me exactly what I needed to understand this authentication process:https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/3228 - The client talks to the DC to try and get a cifs ticket for my samba server's princpal name;- In case the client can't get the ticket for any reason, it falls back to NTLM <- windows client decision, nothing can be done about it by Samba/SSSD; Once I

There are roughly 20 DC's, spread across multiple different physical locations. It is indeed a replication issue. All of them are windows and we can get authenticated by any of them, randomly. Don't ask me why... they're managed by the "windows' guys"... I've already tried all sorts of possible combinations for the various NTLM-related parameters and it always fail

How is your sssd settup (sssd.conf) configured? When someone connects via samba, the underlying linux/unix file system routines need to have some what of understanding the windows users and groups.   This isn't for authentication  but is instead to make sure that the file permissions can be managed and enforced. My experience - at least when I had classic domain Samba controllers-  was

I must be missing something- Are these Windows clients?  Or are these Linux clients authenticating against Samba ? if they were linux clients then yes I could see sssd or other authentication components besides winbind coming into play. And in that case yes you would have sssd work with winbind to enable caching of credentials. Is the event log entry below from the server ?   Is it from

Aguardo-os amanhã. Confirmem presença aqui, por favor. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Google Calendar <calendar-notification-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date: 2012/10/9 Subject: Reminder: StartonRails na [:koshtech] @ Thu 2012-10-11 19:00 - 22:00 To: Fernando Kosh <fernando.kosh-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> more details

Hi Timo.... I Modify the plugin autocreate, that create and subscribe a mailbox to user. My modification consist in do the inverse, if my user don't have permission to create and subscribe a folder, the plugin remove and unsubscribe. My function is called in the same place that create and subscribe is called, just seeing if my flag is "create or delete". My function i copy from

How would samba forward any requests on to any other service ?       You can have sssd setup on a server if you also need to support things like ssh, sftp, and nfs but that is separate from samba's "Windows" services. Or do you mean it forwards NTLM requests to a different server ? Disabling NTLM altogether would be a useful feature if you are trying to minimize the attack