similar to: [Bug 1256] unix domain sockets support

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1256 martin f. krafft <bugzilla.mindrot.org at pobox.madduck.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzilla.mindrot.org at pobox. | |madduck.net

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1256 Patrick Hemmer <mindrot at stormcloud9.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mindrot at stormcloud9.net -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1256 bpeeluk at yahoo.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bpeeluk at yahoo.co.uk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1256 Colin Watson <cjwatson at debian.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cjwatson at debian.org --- Comment #7 from Colin Watson <cjwatson at debian.org> --- It looks as though

On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 12:36:00 -0500 "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi - > > > > Does this new blacklist cover enough that the kernel now survives a > > > broadly wildcarded perf-probe, e.g. over e.g. all of its kallsyms? > > > > That's generally the purpose of the annotations - if it doesn't then > > that's

Hi Here is System tap''s representives response to my comments and mine back to that list. Since it was on a public mailing list i''m reposting here, since there is obvious interest. James Dickens uadmin.blogspot.com ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: James Dickens <jamesd.wi at gmail.com> Date: Sep 13, 2006 1:51 PM Subject: Re: Systemtap vs Dtrace web page

* Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat.com> wrote: > masami.hiramatsu.pt wrote: > > > [...] This series also includes a change which prohibits probing > > on the address in .entry.text because the code is used for very > > low-level sensitive interrupt/syscall entries. Probing such code > > may cause unexpected result (actually most of that area is already

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597 Summary: X11 Forwarding: sshd doesn't listen on unix domain sockets Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2347 Bug ID: 2347 Summary: permitopen doesn't work with unix domain sockets Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.7p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597 cheako911 at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cheako911 at yahoo.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2308 Bug ID: 2308 Summary: Forwarded Unix domain sockets not removed on logout Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.7p1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1984 Bug #: 1984 Summary: Add Unix Domain Socket Forwarding Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.9p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2422 Bug ID: 2422 Summary: [PATCH] creating unix sockets using mux not documented in PROTOCOL.mux Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.9p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component:

Hi - > > Does this new blacklist cover enough that the kernel now survives a > > broadly wildcarded perf-probe, e.g. over e.g. all of its kallsyms? > > That's generally the purpose of the annotations - if it doesn't then > that's a bug. AFAIK, no kernel since kprobes was introduced has ever stood up to that test. perf probe lacks the wildcarding powers of

Hi - > > Does this new blacklist cover enough that the kernel now survives a > > broadly wildcarded perf-probe, e.g. over e.g. all of its kallsyms? > > That's generally the purpose of the annotations - if it doesn't then > that's a bug. AFAIK, no kernel since kprobes was introduced has ever stood up to that test. perf probe lacks the wildcarding powers of

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3449 Bug ID: 3449 Summary: LocalForward doesn't support ~/path syntax for UNIX sockets Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: v9.0p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1775 Summary: RFE: Would like to use 'abstract' unix sockets for ControlPath Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.5p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1775 Simon Deziel <simon at sdeziel.info> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |simon at sdeziel.info -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2236 Bug ID: 2236 Summary: ssh-agent: fix unintended UNIX-domain socket removal Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.6p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ssh-agent Assignee: unassigned-bugs

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2740 Bug ID: 2740 Summary: provide a way of forwarding a Unix-domain socket to user's runtime (home) directory Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.5p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5