similar to: GPO Permissions _AGAIN_

Hi, I am unclear on the relationship between the hostname, DNS domain, server's FQDN, NT4 domain name, etc. Quoting the HOWTO: "For the rest of the HOWTO we will assume that your DNS domain name is samdom.example.com, your short (also known as NT4) domain name is samdom, your Samba server's hostname is samba and the IP Address of your Samba server is 192.168.1.2." What is

Hi all, Some (then all) of our workstations were complaining about incorrect ACLs on GPOs and were unable to read the gpt.ini to apply the GPOs. So I did a sysvolcheck and sure enough I'd lost the ACLs when I moved our sysvol share to a new location on the server (whoops, mea culpa). I ran a sysvolreset which took a long time to return (some 5 minutes, please see my post on slow winbind

Hai, After lots of testing and checking today im must concluded that achim and mathias are right. There are "BUILDIN\" security groups which make some GPOs are going wrong. Also, im getting errors again with sysvolcheck. .. i was in the understanding this was resolved.. but im but off with all info, very buzy at the office atm. samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck ERROR(<class

Hiya, I have an S4 domain running that I added another S4 machine to as an extra domain controller. That machine, unfotunately died (quite spectacularly I must say, think magic blue smoke). I would like to remove the dead domain controller from the domain. In ADUC I can see the DC under 'Domain Controllers' but when I try to delete it (having ticked the 'permanently offline'

On 20/02/15 21:27, Davor Vusir wrote: > > Rowland Penny skrev den 2015-02-19 18:15: >> OK, there is a discussion over on samba-technical about nss_winbind >> and the question about Administrator being mapped to 0 was raised. >> Now I have always thought that it should, but in fairness, I decided >> to see what happens when it isn't, so I removed Administrator

Hai, ? im running samba 4.2.2 sernet on debian. ? when i run : samba-tool gpo aclcheck -UAdministrator ? im getting : ERROR: Invalid GPO ACL O:DAG:DAD:PAI(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED) and it tells me it should be O:DAG:DAD:P?

Dear All, I've recently upgrade from samba 4.1.x to samba 4.2.14 and found that GPO are having issue Specifically when I'm adding new using they *never *got the gpupdate success fully. When I run samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck or samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset But don't seem to got it fix.. Any suggestion? Thank in advance. #samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck Processing section

On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 3:31 PM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > OK, if you look at the end of the permissions, there is a '+' sign, this > shows that extended acls set, to see these: > > getfacl /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol The difference in acls is that the non-working domain includes: user:3000001:r-x user:3000002:rwx user:3000003:r-x

On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 4:24 PM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Yes, that is what it is designed for. Yes, and yes it does! Thank you!!

Hi guys! I´m experiencing a problem with samba 4 policies and acl and i don´t known how it starded to do. Some problems like copy Policies, edit them, etc. It seems like permissions, but i´ve checked the list and can´t find a solution. Here are some outputs that i hope can help to understand: # Sysvol permissions: drwxrwxrwx+ 3 root DOMAIN\domain admins 4096 Mar 7 12:17 sysvol #

Hi, First of all thanks for you answer, it seems that this can help, now some change made to gpo are applied and we are not receiving error in event viewer, but seem that some change are not applied, why and where I can find some information, in samba log anv event viewer any error is reported Also I have tried # samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset After this tried # samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck

G'day Guys, We are running Centos 6.4, samba4.0.10, compiled from tgz. Has anyone come up with this one before? samba-tool gpo aclcheck ERROR(<type 'exceptions.KeyError'>): uncaught exception - 'No such element' File "/usr/local/samba/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 175, in _run return self.run(*args, **kwargs) File

> You could try using a script Louis wrote, see here: > https://github.com/thctlo/samba4/blob/master/samba-check-set-sysvol.sh > > The 'idmap config' lines are nothing to worry about, you cannot set them on a DC, but, for some reason, testparm etc warns about > them. > > Rowland > Sorry, I should have said - I ran louis' script and set the acl's according

Am 2017-05-23 um 20:16 schrieb Rowland Penny: >> Can I reset that somehow manually? > > If you are adding GPOs, then yes, by never running sysvolreset. I only did that after sysvolcheck failed! And I still get these problems in the GPO-management. I translate via googling: "A processing error occurred collecting data using this base domain controller." this one ?

Samba 4.4.2 I was doing some maintenance work and I noticed that sysvolcheck gave some error. I ran "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset". Running sysvolcheck again still gives errors. I tried with several sysvol backups and the result is always the same. The affected policies are always "Default Domain Policy" and "Default Domain Controllers Policy". These policies

Hi! I executed the command "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck" on a DC and I got the following I pasted below. The first DC was provisioned migrating from a samba NT4 PDC with an LDAP backend using the classic upgrade procedure. I haven't detected any problem but I wanted to make sure there isn't any problem I might not be seeing yet. ERROR(<class

For completeness: The existing GPO: # samba-tool ntacl get --as-sddl \{07AF723D-5FFD-4807-B3C6-DFCE911B922A\}/ O:DAG:DAD:P(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED) The newly created GPO: # samba-tool ntacl get --as-sddl \{0C0B713E-EE65-4ACE-88AE-25125E2AAE00\}/

On 21/07/16 22:18, Trenta sis wrote: > I'm not sure what are you deatiling, is a bug in progress taht can cause > this random problems with some gpos or this error can be ignored? > > 2016-07-21 20:37 GMT+02:00 Trenta sis <trenta.sis at gmail.com>: > >> Hi, >> >> First of all thanks for you answer, it seems that this can help, now some >> change

Hello Sébastien Le Ray, The PC reply the following... The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the user name. This could be caused by one or more of the following: a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain controller. b) Active Directory Replication Latency (an account created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller). The

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I use Samba 4.3.3 and Rowland it dosn't metter if I build it by my self or install tehe SerNet-Packages ;-) Everytime I craete a new GPO or change something in an existing GPO, the test with "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck" fails with the following Error: - ---------------- ERROR(<class