similar to: wbinfo -i domain_username issue

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "wbinfo -i domain_username issue"

2013 Feb 20
2
Error in DRS Showrepl
Hi. Here is my problem. I have 2 DC (DC1, DC2) From DC1 I run samba-tool drs showrepl DC1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INBOUND NEIGHBORS : OK OUTBOUND NEIGHBORS : OK ==== KCC CONNECTION OBJECTS ==== Connection -- Connection name: 179ef6ba-a138-46d7-9a64-880ab4608b04 Enabled : TRUE Server DNS name :
2018 May 30
1
Scripting the next UID/GID number to use
Hello. If you want. I have already implemented something like this : ############################### # get user rfc2307 attributes # ############################### # get the new uid # userUid=$(s4ldbsearch -H $samDatabase -s base -b CN=$shortDomain,CN=ypservers,CN=ypServ30,CN=RpcServices,CN=System,$baseDN msSFU30MaxUidNumber | grep 'msSFU30MaxUidNumber:') if [ -z "$userUid"
2018 May 30
2
Scripting the next UID/GID number to use
On Wed, 30 May 2018 10:33:55 +0200 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > > > So, in AD LDAP lingo, a 'modify' is not atomic, and a 'delete/add' > > > yes? > > Ahem, i meant: > > So, in AD LDAP lingo, a 'replace' is not atomic, and a
2018 Jan 16
3
Avoiding uid conflicts between rfc2307 user/groups and computers
Mandi! Kacper Wirski via samba In chel di` si favelave... > I understand the OP, I was asking some time ago similar question, but it was > in relation to samba domain member. Thanks, Kacper. > I couldn't get backend: ad to work for > machine accounts, so i switched to idmap: rid and it solved everything. I > tried manually adding UID and GID to Domain Computer group and to
2004 Oct 05
1
samba server as NT4 domain member- security=domain - need to create password db manually?
# Global parameters [global] workgroup = MYDOMAIN server string = Samba Server %v on %L security = DOMAIN log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 50 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 printcap name = /etc/printcap local master = No dns proxy = No wins server = MYWINSERVER idmap
2018 Jan 17
0
Avoiding uid conflicts between rfc2307 user/groups and computers
2018-01-15 20:14 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:51:12 +0100 > Prunk Dump via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Thank again for your help ! >> >> 2018-01-12 21:26 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org>: >> > The problem is, you are thinking in the wrong direction ;-)
2019 Sep 17
0
Change in behaviour for the "%U" substitution in 4.10.8?
This is unfortunately still happening - anyone else have any other ideas? As a reminder/summary of the information from earlier in the thread; - My [homes] share is "path = /shares/DOMAIN/%U" - I am logging into a Windows 7 client as "DOMAIN\username" - My log.smbd shows "canonicalize_connect_path failed for service username, path /shares/DOMAIN/domain_username"
2019 Sep 17
1
Change in behaviour for the "%U" substitution in 4.10.8?
Hai, Yes, the repo does not allow different versionnumbers, but i do have all my versions in backup. I made a few tar.gz for you so you can test again with 4.10.7 on a local repo. You can find them here. http://downloads.van-belle.nl/samba4/ The 4.10.7 for Stretch Buster and Bionic source and deb's are there to get. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van:
2019 Sep 06
2
Change in behaviour for the "%U" substitution in 4.10.8?
I opted for 'remove the SERVER lines' (since I don't remember why they are in there) - but this hasn't changed the behaviour. The log file contains a different error message, but still refers to the incorrect path --- [2019/09/06 09:43:14.955067,? 0] ../../source3/smbd/service.c:784(make_connection_snum) ? make_connection_snum: canonicalize_connect_path failed for service
2019 Sep 18
0
Change in behaviour for the "%U" substitution in 4.10.8?
Ok so for [homes] is correct now. ? > I'm tempted to try and blow the smb.conf away, Thats not needed in my opinion, at least not yet. ? > However the other share that uses the "%U" substitution in its path still does not work because it's looking for the wrong path on the server.? Have you tried to replace?%U in the path off?the?not working share with ?%u? ? ? ? ?
2019 Sep 17
0
Change in behaviour for the "%U" substitution in 4.10.8?
Hai, ? Well, i did go throught the bug reports, and i could only find one simular thing but in the printing functions. https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13745? ? Can you run this debug script for me, that give me all i need to know about you system and setup. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-collect-debug-info.sh ? Then set debug level 10 and try again. if
2019 Sep 17
1
Change in behaviour for the "%U" substitution in 4.10.8?
I downgraded the packages to 4.10.7 The issue is fixed; the two shares I use which contain %U in their paths are now working correctly using the same Windows 7 client logged in as the same user that breaks on 4.10.8. I realise 4.10.7->4.10.8 was a very small changeset but it really seems like some behaviour has changed there... I obviously don't have any error logs (since there is no
2019 Sep 17
0
Change in behaviour for the "%U" substitution in 4.10.8?
I found the same bug, and discounted it as irrelevant...I can't see the details of the bug related to the CVE which was the only 4.10.8 change, but I can't imagine that would have anything useful either. Just to be clear, do you want information and logs from the working 4.10.7, the broken 4.10.8, or both? Thanks 17 Sep 2019, 14:58 by samba at lists.samba.org: > Hai, > ? >
2005 Aug 01
2
samba-3.0.20rc1 winbind Windows 2003 SP1 ADS wbinfo all fine, but getent passsd or group does not work...
Hi, I've joined a Suse 9.1 Pro linux computer to a Windows 2003 SP1 ADS using: # kinit Administrator@DOMAIN # net ads join The computer account is created on the DC and wbinfo (-t -u -g) all work. Then I try getent passwd or getent group and nothing. This is with: #grep winbind /etc/nsswitch.conf passwd: compat winbind group: compat winbind # ps -ef | grep -E
2019 Sep 06
3
Change in behaviour for the "%U" substitution in 4.10.8?
I've now changed the ownership to root, as you suggest. I've removed the ACLs from /shares/DOMAIN - they don't need to be there as anyone can enter this directory already so there's no need for them. The ACLs on my individual home directory: root at server:/shares# getfacl /shares/DOMAIN/username getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file:
2019 Sep 06
0
Change in behaviour for the "%U" substitution in 4.10.8?
Have you tried running net cache flush after you have removed the SERVER lines from you config? Regards Am 06.09.19 um 12:33 schrieb gac via samba: > I've now changed the ownership to root, as you suggest. > > I've removed the ACLs from /shares/DOMAIN - they don't need to be there as anyone can enter this directory already so there's no need for them. > > The
2019 Sep 06
2
Change in behaviour for the "%U" substitution in 4.10.8?
Hi knowledgable Samba folks, I have a Samba server (Ubuntu 18.04, with the packages from apt.van-belle.nl so that I can run recent versions of Samba with Time Machine). This box is configured to use Active Directory authentication as a domain member. Happy to share relevant parts of configuration if necessary, feel free to just ask. I have two shares that are configured to use %U username
2019 Sep 06
0
Change in behaviour for the "%U" substitution in 4.10.8?
Hai, Before we can say its a bug. Can you show the complete smb.conf Anonimized where needed offcourse. Yesterdays subject "Samba, Time Machine, and ADS" Replied that if working now for him, so whats the the difference here. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens gac via samba > Verzonden:
2008 Nov 29
2
Loginname - mapping
Hi! I have a server with a few thousand mailboxes (for a few hundred domains) on it. The usernames are following several naming conventions: username_domain domain_username username_domain.tld username-domain domain.username The reason for this chaos is that the accounts were set up on different mailservers, some imail, some linux, some with virtualmin and some manually and
2019 Sep 06
2
Change in behaviour for the "%U" substitution in 4.10.8?
No problem - I've pastebin'ed it rather than include it, I don't know what this list's preferences are for config files.?https://pastebin.com/70vTmWyL <https://pastebin.com/70vTmWyL> Note that there's a lot of lines in there - the config has been ported between several boxes and upgrades over at least the 6 years I've been with this company. The thing to remember is