similar to: Rsync copies more than the changes

Hi, I have come to my wits end again (lately, it's a very short trip). I have been trying to connect to Samba 3.0.21b but Windows keeps throwing up the logon dialog. I'm using "Map network drive" to try to mount this share. It seems the problem is only on the Windows side since I have tested the connection through the Unix account. Both user id and password work fine.

Hi, Problem: Out of the blue Vista on my laptop decides it doesn't want to mount a share over PPTP VPN connection. I can mount the share in the local network but I can't do it over VPN. When trying to access the server, using "net view \\172.16.1.71" it shows the error in the subject. Platform/Versions: OS: Sun Solaris 10 11/06 release Samba version:

I am using the following code: library(lattice) data<-read.csv("data.csv") attach(data) fig<-xyplot(S_t~month|event, key = list(text=list(lab=c("Time to first CV event - Data", "Survival post first CV event - Model", "Survival post first MIA/CA event - Data",

I've been asked about "Canonical Variance Analysis" (CVA). I don't see any reference to it searching the R site. Does it go by other names? Genstat describes it thus: Canonical variates analysis operates on a within-group sums of squares and products matrix, calculated from a set of variates and factor that specifies the grouping of units. It finds linear combinations of the

Hi,I'm wondering if anyone has run into this but I found out that I can't use Window's VPN connection and logon to Samba using Aliases. I can log into the server using the server's main NetBIOS name but I can't use any of the aliases. Whilst inside the network the aliases work fine.Any ideas on how to get around this?# Samba config file created using SWAT # from 192.168.1.200

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5051 Summary: --copy-dest copies should use a temporary file unless -- inplace Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

Hi, i have to tranfer large files each 5-100 GB (mo-fri) over dsl line. unfortunately dsl lines are often not very stable and i got a broken pipe error. (dsl lines are getting a new ip if they are broken or at least after a reconnect every 24 hours) i had a script which detect the rsync error and restart the transmission. this means that if a file has transfered e.g. 80 % i start again from

Hi all, >From the manpage of rsync, I can see the following descriptions: --inplace The option implies --partial (since an interrupted transfer does not delete the file) So I do the following testings on the `--inplace' and `--partial' for resuming a file with the following steps: 1- rsync ftp.cn.debian.org::debian/dists/wheezy/main/binary-amd64/

Hello list! How dangerous is acctually the --inplace option if you want to run rsync to update files that are only read and not written to? What is the worst that can happen? The file is not readable, the reader gets half the file of an old version and the rest is from the new version? There is not a simple way to make it update the file in the standard way and then change the ownership

There is the problem which I discribed here https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=12820. rsync does not break hard-link into destination if hard-link has be broken in source with option inplace. The problem remains in the latest version of rsync? -- View this message in context: http://samba.2283325.n4.nabble.com/There-is-problem-of-rsync-with-options-hard-links-inplace-tp4714872.html Sent from

Hi. This is bug report and simultaneously urgent asking for help. I am trying to write my rsync wrapper script, which will create minutely snapshots of my data using --link-dest. I want this script to be robust, it should work even if I do suspend/hibernate/reboot without notifying the script about this actions, it should work if I make hard-reset of the computer and if I disconnect network. Also

Hello everyone, I wanted to ask if there is an R-package to fit the following Poisson regression model log(\lambda_{ijk}) = \phi_{i} + \alpha_{j} + \beta_{k} i=1,\cdots,N (subjects) j=0,1 (two levels) k=0,1 (two levels) treating the \phi_{i} as nuinsance parameters. Thank you very much -- -Tony [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

>- --inplace and --append-verify are essentially irrelevant when >- --link-dest is in play. With --link-dest in play the target system >must write an entirely new file even for a change in permissions or >timestamps so any potential benefit by these options are out the >window from the start. The only thing they can do is add the >possibility of incomplete or corrupt copies on

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5201 Summary: Rsync lets user corrupt dest by applying non-inplace batch in inplace mode Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4079 Summary: rsync fails with --inplace, --link-dest and --no-whole- file Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:33:44PM +0300, Roman Kagan wrote: > Passing that on the command line makes sense for the copying mode, > because in that mode there's no other place where to affect the choices. > > In the in-place mode virt-v2v is given a VM with the configuration > already converted and the choices made (with or without user > interaction); v2v is only expected

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11651 Bug ID: 11651 Summary: Can we allow --inplace and --sparse to coexist when --whole-file is in play? Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core

Hi! As I commonly spell --inplace as --in-place, I'd like to suggest this simple patch: commit 5689f99b702788044a45e13582559832cf986328 Author: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw at lug-owl.de> Date: Wed Jun 26 22:49:31 2019 +0200 Allow "--in-place" as an alternative option name for "--inplace". diff --git a/options.c b/options.c index e5b0cb68..7ff0c51d 100644 ---

> There have been addons to rsync in the past to do that but rsync really > isn't the correct tool for the job. why not correct tool ? if rsync can greatly keep two large files in sync between source and destination (using --inplace), why should it (generally spoken) not also be used to keep two blockdevices in sync ? maybe these links are interesting in that context:

In the 3.0.4 version of the man pagem dated June 29, 2008, it still states: """ (5) the efficiency of rsync?s delta-transfer algorithm may be reduced if some data in the destination file is overwritten before it can be copied to a position later in the file """ Also, I know I have read somewhere in the past that the limitation stems from the fact that "rsync