similar to: ixgbe/ix sysctl missing in FreeBSD 9.2

Hi, Two quick questions that I can't seem to find answers for using google. 1) is is possible to listen outside an ipfw firewall - that is have ethereal record the packets before ipfw starts dropping them? If so how? 2) Is there an api to ipfw that will let me manipulate rules, query stats etc? I need something faster than running the command line binary? Thanks John

Hi, I'm pondering building my own SSL accelerator out of a multi-CPU FreeBSD system and a crypto accelerator. What's the recommended hardware crypto accelerator card these days? Thanks, ==ml -- Michael Lucas mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org Today's chance of throwing it all away to start a goat farm: 49.1% http://www.BlackHelicopters.org/~mwlucas/

Dear List, This is my second post since I did not receive any answers the first time. I have P4P800-VM motherboard with serial ata controlers (ICH5) and serial ata discs. I managed to install FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE on this box when setting the IDE controller in legacy mode. Everything works normal except when booting, the drives are set into UDMA33 mode: atapci0: <Intel ICH5 SATA150

On 01/27/2017 06:08 AM, Karel Hendrych wrote: > Have you tried to eliminate all power management features all over? I've been trying to find and disable all power management features but having relatively little luck with that solving the problems. Stabbing the the dark I've tried different ACPI settings, including completely disabling it, disabling CPU frequency scaling, and setting

I finally got a 10G card that is recognized by FreeBSD (9.1-stable): ... ix0: <Intel(R) PRO/10GbE PCI-Express Network Driver, Version - 2.4.8> port 0xecc0-0xecdf mem 0xd9e80000-0xd9efffff,0xd9ff8000-0xd9ffbfff irq 40 at device 0.0 on pci4 ix0: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors ix0: RX Descriptors exceed system mbuf max, using default instead! ix0: Ethernet address: 90:e2:ba:29:c0:54

On 01/30/2017 06:12 PM, Adi Pircalabu wrote: > On 31/01/17 10:49, Kevin Stange wrote: >> You said 3.x kernels specifically. The kernel on Xen Made Easy now is a >> 4.4 kernel. Any chance you have tested with that one? > > Not yet, however the future Xen nodes we'll deploy will run CentOS 7 and > Xen with kernel 4.4. I'll keep you (and others here) posted on my

On 11/02/17 06:29, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 01/30/2017 06:41 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >> On 01/30/2017 06:12 PM, Adi Pircalabu wrote: >>> On 31/01/17 10:49, Kevin Stange wrote: >>>> You said 3.x kernels specifically. The kernel on Xen Made Easy now is a >>>> 4.4 kernel. Any chance you have tested with that one? >>> >>> Not yet, however

Am 28.03.16 um 16:23 schrieb Marcelo Ricardo Leitner: > Em 28-03-2016 06:27, G?tz Reinicke escreveu: >> Hi, >> >> may be someone has an idea: >> >> We have three supermicron servers with two 10Gb Ports each, connected >> to a cisco switch stack 1Gb ports. All are on auto speed. >> >> I configured a LACP bond on both sides on all servers, first

On 01/30/2017 04:17 PM, Adi Pircalabu wrote: > On 28/01/17 05:21, Kevin Stange wrote: >> On 01/27/2017 06:08 AM, Karel Hendrych wrote: >>> Have you tried to eliminate all power management features all over? >> >> I've been trying to find and disable all power management features but >> having relatively little luck with that solving the problems. Stabbing

Am 29.03.16 um 13:57 schrieb Marcelo Ricardo Leitner: > Em 29-03-2016 03:46, G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator escreveu: >> Am 28.03.16 um 16:23 schrieb Marcelo Ricardo Leitner: >>> Em 28-03-2016 06:27, G?tz Reinicke escreveu: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> may be someone has an idea: >>>> >>>> We have three supermicron servers with

hi, I have a hard time figuring this out, the kernel says: ... ix0: <Intel(R) PRO/10GbE PCI-Express Network Driver, Version - 2.5.15> port 0xecc0-0xecdf mem 0xd9e80000-0xd9efffff,0xd9ff8000-0xd9ffbfff irq 40 at device 0.0 on pci4 ix0: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors ix0: Ethernet address: 90:e2:ba:29:c0:54 ix0: PCI Express Bus: Speed 5.0GT/s Width x8 ix1: <Intel(R) PRO/10GbE

Hi, I noticed that network connection of one of my boxes got significantly slow just after upgrading it to 8.0R. The box has an em0 (82547EI) and worked fine with 7.2R. The symptoms are: - A ping to a host on the same LAN takes 990ms RTT, it reduces gradually to around 1ms, and then it returns to around 1s. The rate was about 2ms/ping. - The response is quite slow, but no packet

This patch adds experimental VMDq support (AKA Netchannel2 vmq) to the ixgbe driver. This applies to the Netchannel2 tree, and should NOT be applied to the "normal" development tree. To enable VMDq functionality, load the driver with the command-line parameter VMDQ=<num queues>, as in: $ modprobe ixgbe VMDQ=8 You can then set up PV domains to use the device by modifying your VM

Hi list, since we activated 10gbe on ixgbe cards + jumbo frames(9k) on 9.0 and now on 9.1 we recognize that after a random period of time, sometimes a week, sometimes only a day, the system doesn't send any packets out. The phenomenon is that you can't login via ssh, nfs and istgt is not operative. Yet you can login on the console and execute commands. A clean shutdown isn't possible

The correct kernel configuration for VMDq support is CONFIG_XEN_NETDEV2_VMQ, not CONFIG_XEN_NETDEV2_BACKEND. Signed-off-by: Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@intel.com> diff -urpN a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe.h b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe.h --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe.h 2009-02-06 09:03:44.000000000 -0800 +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe.h 2009-02-10 14:32:57.000000000 -0800 @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@

On 28/01/17 05:21, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 01/27/2017 06:08 AM, Karel Hendrych wrote: >> Have you tried to eliminate all power management features all over? > > I've been trying to find and disable all power management features but > having relatively little luck with that solving the problems. Stabbing > the the dark I've tried different ACPI settings, including

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2003-02-03 19:50 ------- i'll look into this. ------- You are

Team I have a Dell PowerEdge R720xd, with the Broadcom NetXtreme bcm5720. I found the following thread: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=31769 I find I am unable to use the NIC's (there are 4 on the server). When we put a cable into it we get a "watchdog timeout -- resetting" error, and the machine will pause for 5 or so seconds. IP may or may not come up randomly.

Hi, I have a Dell T710 with 4 X 10G ethernet interfaces (2 X Dual port Intel 82599 cards). It is running FreeBSD RELENG_8 last updated on July 13. What I see is packet loss (0 - 40%) on IPv6 packets in vlans, when the machine is not the originator of the packets. Let me try to describe a little more. If a neigbouring machine ping6 it, there will be packet loss. If it act as a router for ipv6,

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431 ------- Additional Comments From gfernandez at livevault.com 2002-11-08 00:36 ------- Created an attachment (id=174) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=174&action=view) adds readonly flag to scp this change applies to scp.c ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are