similar to: Protocol negotiation issue in rsync

(apologies for the length - there are questions at the end...) I've been running Linux for 20 years, and done a lot of dual-boots. I know that's old-school now, but I run Linux 95% of the time yet don't want to lose a Windows system I've paid for - but I've never tried removing it from a system and reinstalling the same licenced copy inside a virtual machine. I bought a

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1468 Summary: sshd does not log failed attempts using key-based authentication only Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.0p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: security Priority: P2

On 05/08/15 08:06 PM, Andrew Daviel wrote: > > I have Skype 2.1.0 running on CentOS 5, but it does not support video. > > At various times I have tried to install or run more recent versions on > CentOS 5 and CentOS 6, but generally they fail for some reason, e.g. > library requirements. > > We would like to run Skype in some conference rooms, for business > reasons

RedHat released sendmail-8.13.8-10.el5_11.src.rpm which includes sendmail-8.13.8-ssl-opts.patch which adds support for disabling SSLv3 and SSLv2 in sendmail.cf But as far as I can see there is no support in sendmail.mc - I can't see how to compile sendmail.mc to get the required line ServerSSLOptions in sendmail.cf Does anyone know how to do this ? -- Andrew Daviel, TRIUMF, Canada

I recently upgraded my servers to 3.4p1 and have been having a problem connecting with an old Windows SSH1 client by Cedomir Igaly, and also with PuTTY which I just downloaded. I get a "CRC error". This is with OpenSSH that I built from the SRPM, setting the flag in the spec file for RHL 6. My RH6 ssh talks both ways to OpenSSH_2.9.9 (RedHat patch) and to sshd 3.4 on RedHat 7.2. My

I recently compiled openssh 3.4p1 for SGI Irix, and found the same problem I'd had with 2.5. Viz. that Irix /usr/include/paths.h defines _PATH_USERPATH, not USER_PATH, so that defines.h doesn't find it and we get the default, which is missing /usr/bsd (which on Irix has things like head, more, lpr) and /usr/bin/X11. This annoys the users, who want X11 to work. I added a test to

We are trying to upgrade from SSH1 to OpenSSH/SSH2. I see that configuration support for "cipher NONE" was removed in OpenSSH. Is there an alternative for this ? We need to move big files (>100Mb) between machines on the Internet. In the past we had used NFS or ftp but want to block those services at one or both ends. Moving them with SSH 1 scp takes quite a bit of CPU effort for

the whois command in c6 references whois.v6nic.net for ip addresses in the 43.0.0.0/8 range (and maybe others). v6nic is no longer a valid whois server, any nets delegated to it should instead be delegated to apnic. i have no upstream connections... this change was made in the generic sources for jwhois some time ago I see this fix was introduced in F20 here,

On 04/13/2016 08:44 PM, ???? wrote: > # mount > /dev/mapper/VolGroup-lv_root on / type ext4 (rw,usrquota,grpquota) > proc on /proc type proc (rw) > sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw) > devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620) > tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw) > /dev/vda1 on /boot type ext4 (rw) > /dev/vdb on /mnt/extradiskA type ext4 (rw,usrquota,grpquota) >

I'm logging in from an irix machine to a linux machine (both running openssh-2.5.1p2) and am unable to run any X applications. I ran a verbose session and this happens: debug: fd 6 IS O_NONBLOCK debug: channel 0: new [X11 connection from host port 4572] debug: X11 connection uses different authentication protocol. debug: X11 rejected 0 i1/o16 debug: channel 0: read failed debug: channel 0:

PIZZACODE SECURITY ALERT program: rssh risk: low[*] problem: string format vulnerability in log.c details: rssh is a restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp. For example, if you have a server which you only want to allow users to copy files off of via scp, without providing shell access, you can use rssh to do that. Additioanlly, running rsync, rdist, and cvs are

We had an incident recently where an openssh client and server were replaced with trojanned versions (it has SKYNET ASCII-art in the binary, if anyone's seen it. Anyone seen the source code ?). The trojan ssh & sshd both logged host/user/password, and probably had a login backdoor. Someone asked me what was their exposure if they used public/private keys instead of passwords. My

Affected Software: rssh - all versions prior to 2.3.0 Vulnerability: local user privilege escalation Severity: *CRITICAL* Impact: local users can gain root access Solution: Please upgrade to v2.3.1 Summary ------- rssh is a restricted shell which allows a system administrator to limit users' access to a system via SSH to scp, sftp, rsync, rdist, and cvs. It also allows the system

> $ rsync -e 'ssh -v' lingnu.com: > OpenSSH_5.1p1 Debian-2, OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007 > debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config > debug1: Applying options for * > debug1: Connecting to lingnu.com [199.203.56.105] port 22. > debug1: Connection established. ... > debug1: Sending command: rsync --server --sender -de.L . As we can see, rsync runs ssh, and

Since rsync 3.0 i've detected a problem with rssh and -e option....rssh doesn't allow this option...but is essential to me (cyphered transmission with ssh). Surfing the net i've seen a guy that made a patch but I don't know how reliable is...and rssh former programer says he just left the project so it's no longer his problem. Is this stuff going to be updated in rsync or is

Hello everyone, If I have three computers (Host-A, Host-B and Host-C) .... is it possible to execute Rsync from Host-A and use the rsync daemon via SSH on Host-B as the source and the rsync daemon via SSH on host-C as the destination? Thank you in advance for your help. Kevin -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-from-a-third-host--tp20297112p20297112.html Sent from the

Hi, my goal: sftp/scp only access, without the need for linux users. I want to provide 10 sftp/scp directories to 10 people. Let's call this "virtual account" I don't want to create linux users for each of them. I would like to create one linux user (backup_user). In his home-directory will be 10 directories. For each "virtual account" one directory. Every

Hi, On CentOS 7 I?m trying to set up a chrooted SFTP server on which specific users can only read and write on specific folder. And I?d like to disable some commands, so the users can only do ?cd?, ?ls?, ?get? and ?put? (and disabling ?chgrp?, ?chmod?, ?chown?, ?df? etc ?). Is there a way to achieve it, natively or with using a third-party software ? Alexandre MALDEME Analyste d'exploitation

I worked on a proposal like this a few years back (including proof of concept code).? I taught sftp to have an scp personality (closer to scp2 than scp), and it was rejected by the higher ups.? It may have been the dual-personality issue, but I know the scp2 concept was also rejected at the time as it was stated there should be one transfer tool. But the only way to drag scp into this century

Hi, As per the subject line - if I look up setting up chroot jails for SFTP over SSH2 I'm led to various Web sites and patches and also to a CentOS wiki page dated 2005, but what's the 'best' or 'correct' way to set this up for Centos 4.5 and 5? Thanks