similar to: balance induced csum errors

Hi, I added a new drive to an existing RAID 0 array. Every attempt to rebalance the array fails: # btrfs filesystem balance /share/bd8 ERROR: error during balancing ''/share/bd8'' - Input/output error # dmesg | tail btrfs: found 1 extents btrfs: relocating block group 10752513540096 flags 1 btrfs: found 5 extents btrfs: found 5 extents btrfs: relocating block group 10751439798272

Hi, I´m need to customize a debian qcow image, but I have this error virt-customize: error: no operating systems were found in the guest image The command that I´m trying is: virt-customize -v -x -a ./kvm_av_4_4_n0.qcow2 --attach ./one_context/packages.iso -root-password password:acens --run ./ctpd/pro/scripts/one_altavault.sh --firstboot-command "dpkg-reconfigure openssh-server I attach

Have amd64 xen 3.1 installed on debian etch. Have all the domu file systems in lvm. Problem 1 If I have a xfs files system when I mount it on domu I get this error: Filesystem "sda5": Disabling barriers, not supported by the underlying device XFS mounting filesystem sda5 Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: sda5 If I mount with nobarriers the message goes away. If I mount under

I am looking into setting up Xen 4.0 on a simple dual-boot Windows/ubuntu laptop with the following partitions: | Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System | /dev/sda1 * 1 223 1782784 7 HPFS/NTFS | /dev/sda2 223 21713 172624888 7 HPFS/NTFS | /dev/sda3 35854 38914 24576344 7 HPFS/NTFS | /dev/sda4

Hello Gene, thanks for your reply. Yes BIOS mode. The config wants a menu, which loads fine under ext4 and not under btrfs. Under btrfs I have also tried to remove the syslinux.cfg file altogether (which should trigger the boot: prompt if I am not mistaken) and the result is the same: only the copyright line appears and no prompt. The three letter sequence is EDD. The disk is 160GB, here is the

Due to the peculiar way that my root drive is configured (incomplete advance planning for Windows to Linux conversion), I have had thoughts about moving /boot and / to a different place on the drive. Current configuration is: sda1 - 30Gb primary partition (was the E: drive) sda2 - 120 Gb primary partition (was my H: drive) sda3 - 100Mb /boot primary partition sda4 - Extended partition sda5 - 4Gb

Hello, I had a raid1 btrfs (540GB) on vanilla 3.6.3, a disk failed, and removed it at power off, plugged in a new one, partitioned it (to 110GB, by error), and added it to btrfs. I tried to remove the missing device, and it said "Input/output error" after a while. Next attempts simply gave "Invalid argument". I repartitioned, rebooted the system, and made the partition grow:

Hello, because of Windows' hibernation bug I want to boot Linux using the Windows boot manager. I followed this guide: http://syslinux.zytor.com/wiki/index.php/Windows_BCD but unfortunately only "Boot error" is shown when I try to boot Linux. Layout of the disk looks like this: /dev/sda1 * 0+ 16- 17- 131072 83 Linux (Linux boot partition) /dev/sda2 16+

On 04/30/2015 06:51 PM, Chen, Hanxiao wrote: > Hi, Rich > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Richard W.M. Jones [mailto:rjones@redhat.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 7:04 PM >> To: Chen, Hanxiao/陈 晗霄 >> Cc: libguestfs@redhat.com >> Subject: Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH 00/10] virt-resize: add support for resizing MBR >> logical partitions

Hi, I have 2 identical xSeries 346 with 2 identical IBM 72GB scsi drive. What i did is install the centos 4.2 serverCD on the first IBM and set the HDD to raid1 and raid0 for swap. Now what i did is get the 2nd HDD in the 1st Server swap it with the 1st HDD in the 2nd Server and rebuild the Raids. The 1st server rebuild the array fine. My problem is the Second server, after rebuilding it and

I am using the srpm from http://xenbits.xensource.com/kernels/rhel3x/kernel-2.4.21-47.0.1.EL.xs0.3.5. 15.src.rpm (I get the same issue using the binary RPM) the dom0 is running 3.0.3_0 Upon booting the DomU, (the DomU has been passed phy:/dev/sda6, which has been partitioned using qemu) I get the following ioctl errors. ioctl 0000126c not supported by XL blkif ioctl 0000126c not supported

As mentioned on Google+, I have a partition that I can no longer mount normally, containing a lot of my personal data and all backups from my laptop. I found now that I am still able to mount it using the ''nospace_cache'' option, but it takes a couple of minutes and I get "INFO: task btrfs-transacti:1698 blocked for more than 120 seconds." messages reporting the thread

I apologize if the question has been posed before, but I did not find any similar posts by browsing or searching through the forums. Here it goes: I have been using Gentoo Linux for a year now, and never have I had a problem I couldn't solve. However, not long ago I bought a 1 TB hard disk which I divided into 7 partitions: /boot, (swap), /, /var, /tmp, /usr and /home (yes, that's FreeBSD

The goal is to detect when drives start to get an increased error rate, when drives should be replaced soon. Therefore statistic counters are added that count IO errors (read, write and flush). Additionally, the software detected errors like checksum errors and corrupted blocks are counted. An ioctl interface is added to get the device statistic counters. A second ioctl is added to atomically get

Hi I had installed Xen-3.0.4 in Scientific linux 4 (kernel version 2.6.16.33) by following the instructions given in following link project-xen.web.cern.ch/project-xen/xen/howto_slcXen.html I ve created the guest Domain with fedora image of size 2.2GB , disk space as 10GB and the domain started successfully . when i logged into the xm console and checked the disk space its showing only 2.2GB ..

I didn't test this one fully yet, but I'm building Fedora 26 ppc64/le test images now. However it seems like it could be a good idea. I wonder if anyone depends on the images we supply being MBR-based? Rich.

On 07/28/2016 04:20 PM, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: <<>> > i do hope it is driver problem and not the touch pad. > ===> thank you Jesus. strange, but it was the driver. new install ran without a stall. lt is now recovered from 7-32 trashing. i would very much like to install 7-32, but it looks like it just may be that, like fine wine, 7-32 needs to age a little longer for my

HI, I am trying to find out why an old slower machineis faster than a new faster machine. I have a RedHat 6.2 server installation, it runs samba and I have been very happy with it. Filesystem is:- [darryl@keg darryl]$ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hda6 1.2G 735M 387M 66% / /dev/hda1 40M 3.0M 35M 8% /boot /dev/hdc1

On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 09:45:26AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 05:17:42PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >Two simple patches which make libnbd compile on FreeBSD. > > > >Are we OK to copy common/include/byte-swapping.h from nbdkit? There > >is no license issue that I know of. Should we put it in lib/ or > >create a common/

hello: I have been reviewin my message slog and have found the following message: Dec 19 06:27:28 server02 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,7)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 What is error 28 and should I be worried about it? Ray Turcotte