similar to: BIND9_DLZ disallows ddns updates

Hi everyone. I have a Linux nsupdate client sending dns update requests via sssd. Just gone from 4.1.2 to 4.1.3. I've done this: http://linuxcostablanca.blogspot.com.es/2013/09/samba4-bind9dlz-stale-dns-records-with.html After which the forward zone update is working fine: 2014-01-10T12:32:35.376142+01:00 hh16 named[4963]: samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone hh3.site

Samba 4.0.6 git both DC and fileserver with openSUSE 12.3 clients Hi I'm trying to debug why logins to Linux clients are sometimes slow. Here is a login with the user steve2 requesting his (automounted) home folder: ] Kerberos: TGS-REQ authtime: 2013-05-01T20:57:27 starttime: 2013-05-01T20:57:27 endtime: 2013-05-02T06:57:27 renew till: 2013-05-02T20:57:25 Kerberos: AS-REQ steve2 at HH3.SITE

4.0.6 file server for a 4.0.6 domain, reproducible with a 3.6.12, and 3.6.15 file server. File created in a share are created according to the acl set, but not when mounted by cifs: Here is a share [test] read only = No path = /home/test Here is the acl: getfacl test # file: test # owner: root # group: staff2 # flags: -s- user::rwx group::rwx other::r-x default:user::rwx default:group::rwx

Hi I know that this has been addressed before but I couldn't find a solution. Summary: when attempting to write a dns record using nsupdate, nothing gets written to the zone due to the error: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure Everything is working. We can login to the domain from the same client and we have sssd sending the dyndns update requests which also produce the same

4.0.6 with 3.6.12 file server Hi Ordinary users can connect fine: smbclient //oliva/users -Usteve2 Enter steve2's password: Domain=[HH3] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.6.9] smb: \> log: schannel_fetch_session_key_tdb: restored schannel info key SECRETS/SCHANNEL/OLIVA schannel_store_session_key_tdb: stored schannel info with key SECRETS/SCHANNEL/OLIVA auth_check_password_send: Checking

Version 4.0.6-GIT-4bebda4 Hi I have sssd up and running. It works fine except that getent only returns domain users if I specify the object e.g. getent passwd and getent group return only local users but getent passwd steve2 steve2:*:3000034:20513:steve2:/home/users/steve2:/bin/bash and getent group Domain\ Users Domain Users:*:20513: work fine. /etc/nsswitch.conf passwd: compat sss group:

Hi I have a s3 fileserver joined to a s4 DC Here is smb.conf on the fileserver: [global] workgroup = HH3 realm = HH3.SITE security = ADS kerberos method = system keytab winbind enum users = Yes winbind enum groups = Yes idmap config *:backend = tdb idmap config *:range = 3000-4000 idmap config HH3:backend = ad idmap config HH3:range = 20000-40000000 idmap config HH3:schema_mode = rfc2307 winbind

I need Bind so that dynamic dns will work with Linux clients. This was OK in 4.0.5. Any ideas anyone? Provisioning with or moving to BIND9_DLZ produces the error: samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Reading domain information DNS accounts already exist No zone file /usr/local/samba/private/dns/HH3.SITE.zone DNS records will be automatically created DNS partitions already exist Adding

Hi I'm trying to get an Ubuntu 14.04 client to update its rr to a working bind dns DC with Samba 4.1.7. The setup is the same as with our openSUSE clients with sssd 1.11.15 sssd.conf id_provider = ad auth_provider = ad access_provider = ad ldap_id_mapping = False /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 lubuntu-laptop.hh3.site lubuntu-laptop 127.0.1.1 localhost But it is sending a request for the wrong

Hi I'm trying to get an Ubuntu 14.04 client to update its rr to a working bind dns DC with Samba 4.1.7. The setup is the same as with our openSUSE clients with sssd 1.11.15 sssd.conf id_provider = ad auth_provider = ad access_provider = ad ldap_id_mapping = False /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 lubuntu-laptop.hh3.site lubuntu-laptop 127.0.1.1 localhost But it is sending a request for the wrong

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11513 Bug ID: 11513 Summary: Modified rrsync to support write-only usage Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org

I've got two brand-new, fully-patched XP SP2 clients who are suffering a mysterious malaise. These two machines will cause a smbd panic when printing or accessing files on a somewhat random basis. Now, the puzzling thing is that three other XP SP2 clients, including one of the exact same configuration, have no issues whatsoever. I've basically ruled out hardware failure on the server,

Hello all! I googled lists.digium.com and ser mailing list, but did not find any working configuration of asterisk used as voicemail for SER. This is my config if (uri==myself) { if (method=="REGISTER") { save("location"); log (1, "Registered\n"); break; };

On Fri, 11 Nov 2016 11:21:17 -0800 L A Walsh <samba at tlinx.org> wrote: > Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > If you are talking about 'system' accounts (postfix, dovecot, > > apache, etc) then these do belong in /etc/passwd and /etc/group. As > > far as I am aware, windows doesn't use Unix IDs, it uses SID-RIDs > > > ---- > System

Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> writes: > We don't plan to remove this check. Accidental key exposure is still an > unfortunately common problem and, while this check isn't perfect, I'm > pretty sure that it avoids enough real-world misconfiguration to > justify it's continued existence. Maybe the check could have a configuration option to disable it? That

I'm new here, but I feel like chiming in, I hope my opinions are welcome. At first glance at this thread it seems unnecessary to argue about the necessity of these checks when when the option exists to give users the choice. Adding configuration option(s) for users who wish to bypass these checks could allow experienced users to do what they need to, and less experienced users could

Third party programs should not be dictating to users how to manage their systems. Things like: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @ WARNING: UNPROTECTED PRIVATE KEY FILE! @ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Permissions 0660 for '/Users/law.Bliss/.ssh/id_rsa' are too open. It is required that your private key files are

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the fifth release candidate of Samba 4.2. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.2 will be the next version of the Samba suite. IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT THE SUPPORT END OF SAMBA 3

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the fifth release candidate of Samba 4.2. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.2 will be the next version of the Samba suite. IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT THE SUPPORT END OF SAMBA 3

When you do a scaffold, is there a fast way to force it to let you enter in data for any foreign/primary key fields? Thanks, Ben Lisbakken -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.