similar to: RH developer toolset

Unfortunately, this is only for RHEL/CentOS 7, but it can also be found at: https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/devtoolset-3/ On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:39 AM, wwp <subscript at free.fr> wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:18:27 +0100 wwp <subscript at free.fr> wrote: > > > I could find the 1.1 and 2 repos gently provided by Tru Huynh, but quid > > of

Hi all, I could find the 1.1 and 2 repos gently provided by Tru Huynh, but quid of a v3 of the toolset? I've just found that Qt 5.4 requires what's shipped in this v3 (gcc 4.9.1, binutils 2.24) and would prefer installing those from a repo. If not, the sources will rule. Any hint? Regards, -- wwp -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:

I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of Developer Toolset 3 on CentOS Linux 6 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo). QuickStart ---------- You can get started in three easy steps: $ sudo yum install centos-release-scl $ sudo yum install devtoolset-3-toolchain $ scl enable

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM, Sean wrote: > > > <snip> > OK guys .. Firefox 60 is going to take some time .. likely more for > CentOS-6 than CentOS-7. > > They both (C6 and C7 versions) require many non OS tools to build. > > For CentOS-7 .. we need the

I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of Developer Toolset 4 on CentOS Linux 6 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo). QuickStart ---------- You can get started in three easy steps: $ sudo yum install centos-release-scl $ sudo yum install devtoolset-4-toolchain $ scl enable

I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of Developer Toolset 3 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo). QuickStart ---------- You can get started in three easy steps: $ sudo yum install centos-release-scl $ sudo yum install devtoolset-3-toolchain $ scl

I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of Developer Toolset 4 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo). QuickStart ---------- You can get started in three easy steps: $ sudo yum install centos-release-scl $ sudo yum install devtoolset-4-toolchain $ scl

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 06:31 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/09/2018 09:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 07/06/2018 10:30 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > On 07/05/2018 02:27 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > > > On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM, Sean

On 07/06/2018 10:30 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/05/2018 02:27 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: >> On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM, Sean wrote: >>>> >> >> >> <snip> >> >>> OK guys .. Firefox 60 is going to take some time .. likely more for >>> CentOS-6 than CentOS-7. >>

On 07/11/2018 01:36 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/11/2018 08:28 AM, Phil Wyett wrote: >> On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 06:31 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 07/09/2018 09:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> On 07/06/2018 10:30 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>> On 07/05/2018 02:27 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500,

On 07/11/2018 09:20 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:34 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> I pushed the 3 SRPMs that are not in CR to: >> >> http://vault.centos.org/6.10/os/Source/SPackages/ > >> All the other new SRPMS should be available from : >> >> http://vault.centos.org/6.9/cr/Source/SPackages/ > > When you have time,

Hi, May be it's not clear to everyone.. so this's just a quick notice to everyone. Don't use CentOS 7 as a developer workstation since currently there is not included any developer IDE. As eclipse was pulled out from the main distro and put into Red Hat Developer Toolset (which is imho a good idea not to use a 7 years old IDE). But Red Hat Developer Toolset is still not supported on

I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of Developer Toolset in version 7 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo). QuickStart ---------- You can get started in three easy steps: $ sudo yum install centos-release-scl $ sudo yum install devtoolset-7 $ scl

I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of Developer Toolset in version 7 on CentOS Linux 6 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo). QuickStart ---------- You can get started in three easy steps: $ sudo yum install centos-release-scl $ sudo yum install devtoolset-7 $ scl

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:28 AM, wwp <subscript at free.fr> wrote: > Hello Dave, > > > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:18:18 -0700 Dave Johansen <davejohansen at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Unfortunately, this is only for RHEL/CentOS 7 > > Really? It installs and works fine on my CentOS6, more over, on the > Cern pages, it says "for Scientific Linux CERN

Question: If I use mock to build package rpmA from tarballA but rpmA has a dependency that can only be satisfied by package rpmB which must also be built from tarballB then how does the rpmB built from the tarballB get pulled into mock when building rpmA? I am trying to build httpd-2.4.7 from Apache and that needs apr-devel and apr-util-devel > 1.4. I can build apr and apr-utils in mock but

Hello Dave, On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:18:18 -0700 Dave Johansen <davejohansen at gmail.com> wrote: > Unfortunately, this is only for RHEL/CentOS 7 Really? It installs and works fine on my CentOS6, more over, on the Cern pages, it says "for Scientific Linux CERN 6" (note the '6'); repodata says '6' too. > but it can also be found at: >

Thanks for the idea, I'm not in a hurry and don't have a desire to hand-jam upstream versions of firefox onto desktops. I just need to track progress on the patch release and report an ETA to our cyber security team. I just figured CentOS had a fancy devops CI/CD system somewhere that I could keep tabs on to watch what's going on as patches get built, tested and published. Seems

Someone told me that if you have a CentOS or Fedora server, you can pay a Red Hat yearly fee and get them to support it (because the environments are so similar). Can anyone here substantiate this claim? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091211/03c9856b/attachment.html>

On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:18:27 +0100 wwp <subscript at free.fr> wrote: > I could find the 1.1 and 2 repos gently provided by Tru Huynh, but quid > of a v3 of the toolset? > > I've just found that Qt 5.4 requires what's shipped in this v3 (gcc > 4.9.1, binutils 2.24) and would prefer installing those from a repo. If > not, the sources will rule. > > Any hint?