Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "large packet support in netfront driver and guest network throughput"
2020 Sep 29
1
[PATCH net v2] virtio-net: don't disable guest csum when disable LRO
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:32 PM Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:00 AM <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
> >
> > Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface
> > when this interface added to them. Now when
2015 Jul 31
5
[PATCH net-next] virtio_net: add gro capability
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet at google.com>
Straightforward patch to add GRO processing to virtio_net.
napi_complete_done() usage allows more aggressive aggregation,
opted-in by setting /sys/class/net/xxx/gro_flush_timeout
Tested:
Setting /sys/class/net/xxx/gro_flush_timeout to 1000 nsec,
Rick Jones reported following results.
One VM of each on a pair of OpenStack compute nodes with
2015 Jul 31
5
[PATCH net-next] virtio_net: add gro capability
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet at google.com>
Straightforward patch to add GRO processing to virtio_net.
napi_complete_done() usage allows more aggressive aggregation,
opted-in by setting /sys/class/net/xxx/gro_flush_timeout
Tested:
Setting /sys/class/net/xxx/gro_flush_timeout to 1000 nsec,
Rick Jones reported following results.
One VM of each on a pair of OpenStack compute nodes with
2008 Feb 06
3
nic poor performance after upgrade to xen 3.2
Hi,
I''m doing some test on a network 10 gb nics and xen
with version 3.1 i''m measuring 2.5 gb/sec from domU to an external physical machine with iperf.
switching to 3.2 has reduced the measured performance to 40-50 Mb/sec.
did anything change in the network interface?
can someone help me?
thanks
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
2013 Jun 12
26
Interesting observation with network event notification and batching
Hi all
I''m hacking on a netback trying to identify whether TLB flushes causes
heavy performance penalty on Tx path. The hack is quite nasty (you would
not want to know, trust me).
Basically what is doesn''t is, 1) alter network protocol to pass along
mfns instead of grant references, 2) when the backend sees a new mfn,
map it RO and cache it in its own address space.
With this
2008 Nov 12
5
xm create- exit with panic message
Hi Xen-users,
I am trying to boot of my fist guest domain. The below attached message was
thrown on the screen.
I am not quite sure that the below information is sufficient to root cause
the issue.
Where do i look for additional logs to root cause the issue.
Appreciate any info that you think might be useful.
Thanks,
Karthik
xm create -c guest1.conf vmid=2
Using config file
2006 May 25
3
netfront.c: gnttab_query_foreign_access returns non zero in network_tx_buf_gc
I''ve been working form the netfront.c in the testing tree and using SLES
10 RC1 for i386 on a SMP box. When I stress the network using iperf in
a domU, domU acting as client on a gigabit network, I occasionally get a
panic at the dev_kfree_skb_irq(skb); line. This is the same panic as
reported in
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2006-05/msg00919.html
The trace
2020 Sep 29
5
[PATCH net v2] virtio-net: don't disable guest csum when disable LRO
From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface
when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the
virtio-net csum is disable too. That drops the forwarding performance.
Fixes: a02e8964eaf9 ("virtio-net: ethtool configurable LRO")
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang
2020 Sep 29
5
[PATCH net v2] virtio-net: don't disable guest csum when disable LRO
From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface
when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the
virtio-net csum is disable too. That drops the forwarding performance.
Fixes: a02e8964eaf9 ("virtio-net: ethtool configurable LRO")
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang
2016 Oct 20
4
[PATCH net-next v2 6/9] net: use core MTU range checking in virt drivers
hyperv_net:
- set min/max_mtu, per Haiyang, after rndis_filter_device_add
virtio_net:
- set min/max_mtu
- remove virtnet_change_mtu
vmxnet3:
- set min/max_mtu
xen-netback:
- min_mtu = 0, max_mtu = 65517
xen-netfront:
- min_mtu = 0, max_mtu = 65535
unisys/visor:
- clean up defines a little to not clash with network core or add
redundat definitions
CC: netdev at vger.kernel.org
CC:
2016 Oct 20
4
[PATCH net-next v2 6/9] net: use core MTU range checking in virt drivers
hyperv_net:
- set min/max_mtu, per Haiyang, after rndis_filter_device_add
virtio_net:
- set min/max_mtu
- remove virtnet_change_mtu
vmxnet3:
- set min/max_mtu
xen-netback:
- min_mtu = 0, max_mtu = 65517
xen-netfront:
- min_mtu = 0, max_mtu = 65535
unisys/visor:
- clean up defines a little to not clash with network core or add
redundat definitions
CC: netdev at vger.kernel.org
CC:
2009 Oct 10
2
[R-SIG-Mac] rnorm.halton
Hi all,
I need to transform classic 32bit Fortran code to 64bit Fortran code,
see the discussion [R-SIG-Mac] rnorm.halton. But I'm clearly a
beginner in Fortran...
Does someone already do this for his package?
From here, http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/tpl/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?coll=linux&db=bks&fname=/SGI_Developer/Porting_Guide/ch03.html
, I identify the following changes
2011 Jun 10
1
[PATCH] virtio_net: introduce VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID
There's no need for the guest to validate the checksum if it have been
validated by host nics. So this patch introduces a new flag -
VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID which is used to bypass the checksum
examing in guest. The backend (tap/macvtap) may set this flag when
met skbs with CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY to save cpu utilization.
No feature negotiation is needed as old driver just ignore this flag.
2011 Jun 10
1
[PATCH] virtio_net: introduce VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID
There's no need for the guest to validate the checksum if it have been
validated by host nics. So this patch introduces a new flag -
VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID which is used to bypass the checksum
examing in guest. The backend (tap/macvtap) may set this flag when
met skbs with CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY to save cpu utilization.
No feature negotiation is needed as old driver just ignore this flag.
2007 Oct 14
2
DomU stops on boot inside Dom0 while booting
I have installed xen on a node and while starting up a guest while in
the kernel boot I am experiencing a hold/pause. The kernel stops in the
boot sequence still loading the kernel at:
stdout
...
[ 3240.186441] xencons_init: Initializing xen vfb; pass xencons=tty to
prevent this
[ 3240.186538] Xen virtual console successfully installed as xvc0
[ 3240.186598] Event-channel device installed.
[
2013 Jan 04
31
xennet: skb rides the rocket: 20 slots
Hi Ian,
Today i fired up an old VM with a bittorrent client, trying to download some torrents.
I seem to be hitting the unlikely case of "xennet: skb rides the rocket: xx slots" and this results in some dropped packets in domU, I don''t see any warnings in dom0.
I have added some extra info, but i don''t have enough knowledge if this could/should be prevented from
2013 Feb 05
2
pv driver with NAPI support
hello,
I tried using NAPI in pv network drivers, but i discovered that it don''t
supports NAPI (kernel 3.5.0-17, xen 4.3.1).
I like to know if any version of pv driver supports NAPI
regards
Eduardo
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-users
2013 Jul 09
20
[PATCH 1/1] xen/netback: correctly calculate required slots of skb.
When counting required slots for skb, netback directly uses DIV_ROUND_UP to get
slots required by header data. This is wrong when offset in the page of header
data is not zero, and is also inconsistent with following calculation for
required slot in netbk_gop_skb.
In netbk_gop_skb, required slots are calculated based on offset and len in page
of header data. It is possible that required slots
2011 Jul 28
1
[RFC net-next PATCH 3/4] ethtool: Add new set commands
On Jul 28, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Rose, Gregory V wrote:
>
>> From: Anirban Chakraborty [mailto:anirban.chakraborty at qlogic.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 12:04 PM
>> To: Rose, Gregory V
>> Cc: David Miller; netdev; Ben Hutchings; Kirsher, Jeffrey T
>> Subject: Re: [RFC net-next PATCH 3/4] ethtool: Add new set commands
>>
>>
>> On Jul 28,
2011 Jul 28
1
[RFC net-next PATCH 3/4] ethtool: Add new set commands
On Jul 28, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Rose, Gregory V wrote:
>
>> From: Anirban Chakraborty [mailto:anirban.chakraborty at qlogic.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 12:04 PM
>> To: Rose, Gregory V
>> Cc: David Miller; netdev; Ben Hutchings; Kirsher, Jeffrey T
>> Subject: Re: [RFC net-next PATCH 3/4] ethtool: Add new set commands
>>
>>
>> On Jul 28,