similar to: shorewall-lite error at start

Hi I''m running on a debian box shorewall-4.5.17. My main gateway is a router running on openwrt and I want to use the shorewall-lite packet provided by openwrt. The openwrt''s provided shorewall-lite packet is 4.5.7. So my questions would be: 1: Do I need to make some modifications before installing shorewall-core-4.5.7/shorewall-4.5.7 on my debian box? 2: if I have both

hi, while stopping shorewall 4.5.21.2 on a debian7 box with the ADMINISABSENTMINDED set to no in shorewall.conf, the connections on vlan tagged interfaces that were active before the shorewall stop command was executed are not terminated as it is for the firewall and other interfaces! when the firewall is stopped as expected new connections on vlan tagged interface are refused but even

Shorewall 4.5.20 is now available for download. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. P R O B L E M S C O R R E C T E D I N T H I S R E L E A S E ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) On some distributions, the shorewall-lite and shorewall6-lite uninstallers could fail with a syntax error. 2) A

hello, while starting shorewall4.5.20 on debian7 I get the following from touch touch: cannot touch `/var/lock/subsys/shorewall'': No such file or directory The needed file can not be created because the directory subsys is not present! If I creat the folder manuallly touch does not complain when shorewall start! Thus it would be nice if durring start shorewall could check if the

Hi folks, I''m having an issue with rsync between my firewall and an internal box. It seems to be a shorewall issue (or correctly speaking, an issue with my shorewall config) because if I disable shorewall my rsync works fine. And I just can''t find it documented anywhere what I need to do. I have rules like this : root@userver:/etc/shorewall# grep -i Rsync rules

Hi all, I''m tring to convert some manually written iptables rules into a shorewall configuration but I''m facing some issue with mode statistic. In our outgoing smtp we balance the source IP address of outgoing connections originating from the firewall between 4 alias configured on eth0 interface: eth0 inet addr:xxx.xxx.xxx.18 Bcast:xxx.xxx.xxx.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 eth0:1

I give up and need help! I won''t add to the confusion by showing all the combinations I have tried unsuccessfully... and yes, I''ve read FAQ2 and FAQ2a many times! When googling the subject of this post there are many answers that boil down to using the same three iptables rules, two of which use nat. I won''t repeat them here. I don''t want to risk mixing

Hi, I use shorewall-4.5.4 + lsm-0.143 and it does not seem to work as expected... When all providers are up, everything seems fine. When one goes down, lsm says "link <provider> down event"... and it seems ok but we then experience some problems such as a few unreachable sites, DNS problems... If I remove the downed provider from all confs and restart, everything works again.

Hi, I have servers where shorewall6 won''t reject nor log: # cat /etc/shorewall6/zones fw firewall net ipv6 # cat /etc/shorewall6/interfaces net eth1 tcpflags (I also tried without "tcpflags", but no changes) # cat /etc/shorewall6/policy $FW all ACCEPT all all REJECT info # cat /etc/shorewall6/rules SECTION NEW (for testing, I removed all the rules) I am testing from

Hi, I want to configure QoS in my shorewall conf but I have a doubt. Now I am using tcrules with prerouting and with the file providers, like this. 2:P 192.168.0.11 0.0.0.0/0 tcp 25 So, with this way I route my smtp traffic with my provider number 2. Well, now I want to configure QoS with tcclasses and tcdevices, but if I do that I need to use the MARK in the tcclasses So, how

the establishment of an openvpn link sometimes fails. I tracked it down to network traffic with wrong Sourceport in the answer packet (should be 1300 not 1024): 2 1.119309000 aaa.185.165 bbb.162.192 UDP 58 Source port: 1300 Destination port: 1300 3 1.119446000 bbb.162.192 aaa.185.165 UDP 66 Source port: 1024 Destination port: 1300 and a collateral entry in the connection tracking table

Hi, I have 2 Debian testing boxes running a very similar setup (both running the latest aptosid kernel); on one of them, since the iptables/libxtables10 packages have been upgraded from 1.4.19.1-1 to 1.4.20-2, shorewall-init can''t start shorewall anymore and for this reason ifupdown also fails triggering firewall up. Shorewall can be successfully started later on, and ifupdown starts

I''m trying to use my VPS server (single interface of course) as somewhat of a VPN gateway to my other location (which is not accessible directly from some places) where the openvpn server is running, and am kind of lost as to what to try next. I tried a redirect rule, but apparently shorewall didn''t like that (it just failed to start). I tried adding the rules via

Hi to all For is just az concept question : There are a need to change something in Squid3 config when it are running in the same box as shorewall with 2 ISP ? I''ve been thinking in do this at home, as a proof of concept for future implememtations ... I allways use Roberto''s Debian package to implement Shorewall . Fábio Rabelo

When using shorewall with a road warrior openvpn setup, how can I get the tun interface to masq through a lan interface? Example Setup: Machine A (tun0 10.0.0.1) -----------VPN---------(tun0 10.0.0.2)---------Machine B(10.10.10.1) When I ping Machine B from Machine B, Machine B is receiving the echo request, but it doesn''t know the route back to the 10.0.0.0/24, and there

Hi Has anybody tried to combine shorewall (instead of iptables) with packetfence? /Göran ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and

Dear all, I''m setting up a new gateway for a small network (under 30 users)Gw will host the following services:shorewalldnsproxy i''m considering installing snort.can i do so on the same exact box ? is there any security risk of doing so ? box would have 4 ISPs and two internal interfaces. Any recommendation about the optimal setup of snort and shorewall (or if you suggest

Hello, I''m using shorewall-4.5.16 with centos5. The dhclient stores the lease information on the /var/lib/dhclient/dhclient-<DEVICE>.leases file. The /var/lib/shorewall/firewall script has the function detect_dynamic_gateway that detects the gateway based on the leases file. The code in the function is: detect_dynamic_gateway() { # $1 = interface local interface

Hi, In log I get: ----------------------------------------------------------- Sep 30 16:19:03 host kernel: Shorewall:FORWARD:REJECT:IN=eth0 OUT=eth0 SRC=ip1 DST=ip2 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=118 ID=27279 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=51501 DPT=25 WINDOW=8192 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 ---------------------------------------------------------- Even in /etc/shorewall/rules I have

Hi all, I need an help to implement this kind of rules on shorewall: iptables --insert INPUT -p udp --dport 53 -m u32 --u32 "0x28&0xFFDFDFDF=0x055a5a47 && 0x2c&0xDFDFFFDF=0x53540343 && 0x30&0xDFDFFFFF=0x4f4d0000" -j DROP This kind of rules need to block a DNS Amplification Attack. I found this file