similar to: iax2: two users can't authenticate from same ip address

Hi all, I have tried to install Wanpipe 7.0.20 in a fresh-installed Debian 8.5 (Jessie) server, but when I reach to the point where I have to enter the Linux Headers directory *(installed in default with ?apt-get install linux-headers-$(uname -r)?)*, I get an error, the package refuses to compile and installation aborts. If I try the same process with Debian 7 (Wheezy), installation works just

Using zoiper on a nexus 4, asterisk 11.5.1, sometimes we see failed authentication. The secret seems correct, so we can't figure out why we're getting failed authentication. But at the same time the device shows as registered: [Oct 8 18:14:14] NOTICE[510]: chan_iax2.c:11071 socket_process_helper: Peer 'n4' is now REACHABLE! Time: 441 [Oct 8 18:15:58] NOTICE[519]:

Hi, Thanks for your info, What is the impact of the following line in dialplan, Dial(SIP/19201/19202,300) On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Vinicius Fontes <vinicius at aittelecom.com.br> wrote: > You might want to use the Originate() application instead. Check its usage > by issuing the command 'core show application originate' on Asterisk CLI. > > 2015-09-03

I have service with both VoIPtalk.org and Andrews & Arnold (aa.net.uk). VoIPtalk calls are unauthenticated and reach me fine, but Andrews & Arnold calls are authenticated. The last call I successfully received was on Tuesday afternoon. Initially, A&A were for some odd reason not sending calls to my server, but that has been resolved. The problem now is that the calls fail to

Hi AJ, Am 06.06.2016 um 10:14 schrieb A J Stiles: > But why not call an AGI script, have this check the caller ID against a MySQL > database and return a status -- blocked or not -- in a variable? Then you can > manage individual number blocking in a much cleaner, more extensible fashion. > > Feel free to ignore me if it sounds like I'm suggesting you walk all the way > to

Hi, I created an account but when I go to issues.asterisk.org <http://issues.asterisk.org/> It still asks for a client certificate. See this screen shot, hopefully it showswhat I mean. http://firestar-hosting.com/clientcert <http://firestar-hosting.com/clientcert>.png -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello, I would to allow users to place calls overseas such as India and Malaysia but only with a security code. if they don't have a security code I want to be able to drop the calls. can someone point me to a right direction to achieve this goal? Thanks, Motty -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

This is exactly what I do - “press 1 for a human” Works great ________________________________ From: asterisk-users <asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com> on behalf of Greg Woods <greg at gregandeva.net> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2019 6:34 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Block Spam Calls Most spam calls are

>>> Nobody has any information or opinions on any of this? Personally, I don't think MACROS are going anywhere any time soon, so I have not bothered looking into a substitution. As for ael; I've never used it. Doug

Hi, I need dialplan to set INCOMING call forwarding during lunch break to my secretary. I want that I can set call forwarding by dialing an extension number to turn it ON or OFF. I am using asterisk 11. Thanks Abdullah Faheem -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I was successful in compiling asterisk in raspbien except for the following error If I enable the gsm codec. It appears there is something in the Makefile n this directory that needs to be changed. Probably involving optimization. Not sure why it does not recognize the processor since it is one that is mentioned in the Makefile.? Any help would be appreciated. make[2]: Entering directory

Hello Doug, Friday, December 13, 2019, 11:03:37 AM, you wrote: >> This is exactly what I do - “press 1 for a human” >> Works great > I do this as well, but I also do a database lookup to see if the number > is on our speeddial list and if so, pass the call directly on without > the IVR prompts. I do something similar for calls without caller ID, but I was still getting

I have been stepping into pand. There is nothing I can find on this list about getting pand working. There are some instructions on wifi.bluez.org that seem to be redhatish, but.... I have edited /etc/sysconfig/pand: PANDARGS='--listen --role GN --master' I have created a /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-bnep0: DEVICE=bnep0 BOOTPROTO=none ONBOOT=no IPADDR=192.168.201.101

On Wed, December 23, 2015 8:06 am, Meikel wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have a server at Soyoustart.com (which is a brand of OVH). I run > CentOS 6.7 and have problems with network configuration. > > I want to add a second public ip (failover ip) to the server and did > follow the instructions in the CentOS-section of > http://hilfe.ovh.de/AdministrationIpAliasHinzufuegen >

Hi all, I'm trying to resolve a weird issue with SIP routing. I have a number of SIP trunks, from a selection of providers, all of which are registered in sip.conf: [general] context=default allowguest=no allowoverlap=no udpbindaddr=0.0.0.0 tcpenable=yes tcpbindaddr=0.0.0.0 transport=udp bindport=15060 srvlookup=yes allowsubscribe=yes

> Date: Monday, October 03, 2016 22:00:07 -0400 > From: TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> > >> From: Gordon Messmer >> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM >> >> On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote: >> > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every >> > was possible to be able to access the guest from the LAN

> Op 23 dec. 2015 om 18:31 heeft Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> het volgende geschreven: > > >> > > If I understand IP networking correctly, you only can have "aliases" of > the interface appear on the _same_ network segment (I'm tempted to say > same class C network) as the main IP of interface, say you have: > > DEVICE=eth0

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gordon Messmer > Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote: > > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every was

Awesome. I'm happy with moving the .rst file into that directory and not have it on the public website. I'll try to make a patch that lands enough scaffolding to build `not` in the next few days, and then I'll land the other build files I have through the regular build process after that. Unless someone feels strongly, I'll go with Justin's suggestion of llvm/utils/gn/... On