similar to: [shoulda-matchers gem] validate_numericality_of_matcher strange behaviour

Hello, I have this in my spec it { should validate_numericality_of(:amount).greater_than_or_equal_to(0) } but I get error: Failure/Error: it { should validate_numericality_of(:amount).greater_than_or_equal_to(0) } NoMethodError: undefined method `greater_than_or_equal_to'' for #<RSpec::Matchers::Matcher:0xef23150> this page

I''m using Rails 2.0.2 and I have been trying to take advantage of the "validates_numericality_of" with the ":greater_than" option with something like this: validates_numericality_of :users, :greater_than => 0, :only_integer => true, :allow_nil => true, :message => "The number of allowed users must be a whole number greater than zero." But this

It seems that the validations for: greater_than greater_than_or_equal_to less_than less_than_or_equal_to equal_to odd even Simply do not work (Rails 2.0.2). I''ve tried every combination I can think of and these never seem to fire. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails:

Hi, I am trying to validate a numeric value passed in from a form, which is saved in a MySQL db as decimal(9,2) Now problem is I need to ensure people don''t enter a form value like -. 003. In my validations, I have a validates_numericality_of check being done. Furthermore, in validate method, I have a check using an if statement such as : ((an_object[n].nil? or an_object[n] < 0) and

I was trying out RSpec framework in a project and got stopped doing the unit test of a model. In particular, doing the test for the associations and the ActiveRecord validations. I started writing the validations but my tests didn''t look DRY at all. Before refactoring the tests checked out and look for other people solutions. I found out shoulda-matchers and Shoulda (which if I

hello, Getting this error when using shoulda and rspec for model tests. my gemfile ... gem "shoulda-matchers" .. spec file .. it { should have_many(:balances).dependent(:destroy) } error: User shoulda validations Failure/Error: it { should have_many(:balances).dependent(:destroy) } NoMethodError: undefined method `dependent'' for

Hi, I am new in rails testing, and now i try to use shoulda to test the functional section. can anyone give me some advice, example or recommend tutorial site to me.. thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To

Hi Is there functional testing examples availbale? This for both login and nonlogin users with or without admin privileges.I Dont know where to start. Kindly help. Tom -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

I cannot manage to have shoulda working. I''m using rvm with rails 3.1 and ruby 1.9.2 I added group :test do gem "shoulda" end to the Gemfile, and then run bundle install, thus the gem is installed, and it is featured in the list running gem list --local. but whenever I add something like class ModelTest < Test::Unit::TestCase should_not

We''ve made quite a few contributions in our facebooker fork (http://github.com/collectiveidea/facebooker ), but unfortunately, one thing some of our contributions have in common with many others is the lack of testing. I want to change that. I''d like to help lead an effort to make the facebooker tests better. One thing that I think would help is a little better

I am using rails edge. I am using gem "rspec-rails", "= 2.0.0.beta. 19" . I have following code at spec/models/user_spec.rb require ''spec_helper'' describe User do it { should validate_presence_of(:email) } it { should validate_presence_of(:name) } end Here is my gemfile group :development, :test do gem ''factory_girl_rails'',

I''m using Shoulda. After copying the code here.... .... http://joshuaclayton.github.com/code/2009/07/14/should-act-as-list.html.... into my test_helper file so I can test acts_as_list, I came across issues. For one I realized I had to get rid of the _ between the "should" and "have" in past cases, but here, I get this error when I run my unit test:

I have a model ''xp_jurisdiction_taxes'' which rails (3) created correctly. Another model ''xp_jurisdiction_states'' has many :xp_jurisdiction_taxes. In my spec I am using a shoulda helper to test the association but get the following error. BTW, greped the whole project just in case and the string ''taxi'' exists nowhere. 1)

Hey, we''re currently using shoulda (http://dev.thoughtbot.com/ shoulda/) on a project and I saw some things that would be really nice to see in rspec, namely the should_ methods, and especially the should_be_restful method. Do these go against the rspec goals at all? Or could an ambitious programmer go to town implementing these for rspec_on_rails? Nathan Sutton fowlduck at

Hey all, If any of you are using the new predicate_matchers feature, I just committed a change to it in trunk. See http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=10542&group_id=797&atid=3152 for more details, but the high level is that instead of this: predicate_matchers[:method_on_object] = :method_in_spec It now (as of rev 1898 - soon to be released in 0.9.2) does this:

I am looking for a good a - z matchers tutorial . Anyone got a url for one? Thanks Anthony Broad-Crawford -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20080303/fd652444/attachment-0001.html

Spec your generated Ruby code files code-spec at: http://github.com/kristianmandrup/code-spec Spec your file structure (files, dirs, symlinks) file-spec at: http://github.com/kristianmandrup/file-spec More to come...

Hey Everyone, Is it good practice to call matchers from within matchers? Kinda like this pattern: See: http://gist.github.com/570467 -- Brian

I find myself doing this kind of thing a lot in Controller Specs: @vacancy = mock_model(Vacancy) @vacancy.stub!(:reference) @vacancy.stub!(:title) @vacancy.stub!(:created_at) @vacancy.stub!(:updated_at) @vacancy.stub!(:body) @vacancy.stub!(:contract) @vacancy.stub!(:location) @vacancy.stub!(:salary) @vacancy.stub!(:benefits)

[Rails plugin 1.0.5] Hi, I am looking for some guidance. When working on a partial which looks like this <div class="bug" style="width: 100%;" /> I have some examples which should fail - I think - but do not: it '' should fail'' do response.should have_tag( ''div.bug'', :content => ''There is no