similar to: sieve vacation question

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "sieve vacation question"

2016 Mar 21
3
sieve - editheader - edit in place
Hello, i do some tests with sieve editheader extensions. deleteheader and addheader are working, but i noticed that new headerlines are always prepended to current header. So new lines can be found always on top. I am looking for a possibility to edit a headerline in place, without moving the new line to top of stack(replaceheader?). It is not looking good if a Subject-Line suddenly moves to
2016 Jun 01
3
forwarding emails using sieve
I know this is a tad tangential to dovecot, but maybe someone has some pointers for me. I'm trying to forward emails using the sieve filtering and redirect doesn't do it because it doesn't wrap the message in a new email, instead, it seems to just change the envelope From (and To). This causes the outbound relay to reject the message for security/spam reasons (forged From). It
2015 Apr 08
3
sieve plugin editheader not found
Hey folks, ive already made a bug report in the gentoo bugtracker last year. In the meantime after some releases the error persists with the current dovecot and pigeonhole versions. Please see my bug report at gentoo mailinglist: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=522148 Okay, here are some informations: Steps to Reproduce: add "editheader" to sieve options or
2013 Feb 08
1
sieve /editheader / addheader :last crash
Hi Everybody, I'm using dovecot 2.1.14 from http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/ with debian squeeze stable. In general, sieve works fine for me, but "addheader :last ..." from the editheader extension causes a crash when it processes a message. I was able to narrow this down a bit: It only happens if "addheader :last" is the first editheader command executed in a script.
2015 Mar 04
1
Sieve editheader should support adding Received and Auto-Submitted headers
In order to simplify auto-response suppression and other filtering, I want to synthesise an Auto-Submitted header on notification mails that should have them but do not. In a sieve file I add the following: if anyof ( header :contains ["From","Sender"] ?info at example.com" ) { if header :contains "Subject" [" just joined "," just left
2018 Nov 20
4
Replacing email envelope
Hi, Could you please advice how I can replace envelope of a message received on my server? Best would be using sieve. Simple case - email A at example.com ?receives message, which I'd like to repack into new envelope (I want to have control what values in the envelope will be there - from, to, replay-to et.c) and send to B at test.com . At first I wanted to use editheader
2012 Jul 25
2
Sieve & Adding headers.
Hi all, I've just migrated my mail system from procmail to managesieve/sieve and I'm having trouble trying to duplicate a could of rules I used to use in my procmail config. One particular rule would be this: :0 Wfh * ^Sender: owner-scientific-linux-devel at LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV | (sed -e '/^Subject:/ s/\[SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL\] *//g'| sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/Precedence:
2013 May 01
1
sieve: deleteheader sometimes fails [bug]
Hi, We're using Dovecot 2.1.16 with Pigeonhole 0.3.4. Mail is delivered by exim4 to the dovecot LDA. Sometimes users are unable to delete headers. I've narrowed the problem down to preceding the deleteheader command with a query against the body. A simple example: """ require ["body", "editheader", "fileinto"]; if body :contains
2008 May 31
1
Sieve Editheader Extension?
I've done extensive searches, and there is virtually no information about actual implementations of the draft Sieve Editheader Extension (which provides 'addheader' and 'deleteheader' actions): http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-editheader-11.txt Is anyone currently working on this for Dovecot Sieve? If not, are there any plans to do so? And before I
2019 Jul 23
2
Sieve adding header content to a different header
Given a message itht he headers: Subject: This is the subject: X-Foo: bar how would I do the following: 1) Add the contents of X-Foo to subject Subject: [bar] This is the subject 2) replicate the X-Foo header into X-temp X-temp: X-foo-bar -- THE PRESIDENT DID IT IS NOT AN EXCUSE Bart chalkboard Ep. AABF05
2020 May 13
5
Sieve addheader directive works only partially
Hi all, I want to add a custom header to incoming emails from a particular sender. This is what my user Sieve script looks like: require ?editheader?; if address :is "From? ?special-sender at example.com? { addheader ?X-My-Custom-Header? ?Header Value"; } I have enabled the editheader extension in my Dovecot configuration: plugin { ? sieve_extensions = +editheader }
2014 May 02
2
When the subject portion of an e-mail contains a control character, dovecot.sieve terminates unexpectatedly.
Hello. We have currently set dovecot.sieve to insert the text "[SPAM]" at the beginning of an e-mail's subject when it's X-Spam-Score is above 80%. After we set our system as stated the following errors occur: 1) When an e-mail's subject contains control characters like [Ctrl+V|^V], dovecot.sieve terminates with an error and an e-mail is not able to be sent. When a MIME
2018 Mar 03
2
pigeonhole 0.4.22 with sieve_before script crashes
Hello! Dovecot 2.2.34 (874deae) Pigeonhole version 0.4.22 (22940fb7) After the update to pigeonhole version 0.4.22 the following configuration does not work. With version 0.4.21 it works. dovecot.conf (only sieve configuration) --------------------------------------------------------------- managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope
2014 May 09
3
v2.2.13.rc1 vs. Pigeonhole
Server: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS 32bit There seems to be an incompatibility when compiling Pigeonhole against Dovecot v2.2.13.rc1. # make check with Pigeonhole throws up the following error message: <snip> Test case: ./tests/extensions/editheader/addheader.svtest: 1: Test 'Addheader - first' SUCCEEDED 2: Test 'Addheader - last' SUCCEEDED 3: Test 'Addheader - framed'
2018 Mar 03
2
pigeonhole 0.4.22 with sieve_before script crashes
Op 3/3/2018 om 9:15 AM schreef Stephan Bosch: > Op 3/3/2018 om 2:57 AM schreef Jan: >> Hello! >> > We're looking into it. Right, this is not reproducible in the test suite, but I can reproduce it when I replicate your setup. Regards, Stephan. >> Dovecot 2.2.34 (874deae) >> Pigeonhole version 0.4.22 (22940fb7) >> >> After the update to pigeonhole
2020 May 19
1
Sieve addheader directive works only partially
Hi Stephan, Sorry for the delay - this was on version 2.3.4.1 (f79e8e7e4). Relevant bits from the config: # 2.3.4.1 (f79e8e7e4): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.5.4 () # OS: Linux 4.19.0-9-amd64 x86_64 Debian 10.4 managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric
2019 Jun 14
2
Addheader specified field name `Reply-To:' is invalid.
Well, progress. At least now editheader loads. Sadly that brings up new errors. specified field name `Reply-To:' is invalid. if header :contains "List-id" "<users.spamassassin.apache.org>" { addheader "Reply-To:" "<users.spamassassin.apache.org>"; addheader "X-added-reply-To:" "True"; fileinto :create
2009 Apr 03
3
Adding Sieve Extensions
How can I add an extension to Dovecot's Sieve implementation? I would like to use 'editheader' and 'redirect'. Thank you! James
2018 Feb 16
4
Sieve to process list mail based on list-ID
Before I spend a lot of time trying to replicate a procmail script that automatically sorts list mail into mailboxes based on the List-ID header (and possibly some other data) I thought I'd check if someone had already done this for sieve. Basically, what I do now in procmail is 1. Get the listname from the List-ID header (or List-post/List-owner if no ID) 2. check against a list of
2020 Sep 03
2
Sieve: deleteheader not working with duplicate filter for implicit keep
Hi Stephan, On Wednesday 02 September 2020 19:59:57, Stephan Bosch wrote: > > > On 29/08/2020 21:04, Alec Moskvin wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have a rule to always delete a header. If the message gets fileinto'd, > > the header is gone, but if it's delivered into the INBOX through > > implicit keep, the header does not get deleted. > > >