similar to: Routing on one interface with IP alias

Hi, I have 2 Debian testing boxes running a very similar setup (both running the latest aptosid kernel); on one of them, since the iptables/libxtables10 packages have been upgraded from 1.4.19.1-1 to 1.4.20-2, shorewall-init can''t start shorewall anymore and for this reason ifupdown also fails triggering firewall up. Shorewall can be successfully started later on, and ifupdown starts

Hi I''m running on a debian box shorewall-4.5.17. My main gateway is a router running on openwrt and I want to use the shorewall-lite packet provided by openwrt. The openwrt''s provided shorewall-lite packet is 4.5.7. So my questions would be: 1: Do I need to make some modifications before installing shorewall-core-4.5.7/shorewall-4.5.7 on my debian box? 2: if I have both

When using shorewall with a road warrior openvpn setup, how can I get the tun interface to masq through a lan interface? Example Setup: Machine A (tun0 10.0.0.1) -----------VPN---------(tun0 10.0.0.2)---------Machine B(10.10.10.1) When I ping Machine B from Machine B, Machine B is receiving the echo request, but it doesn''t know the route back to the 10.0.0.0/24, and there

Hi All, I have a custom TC configuration where I''m building the tc hierarchy manually with the tcstart script. I also need to add custom iptables rules in the mangle table to classify the packets. Currently I''m using started to insert the iptables commands, but that''s way too late in the process. I tried putting them into the initdone file, but it''s trying to

Dear all, I''m setting up a new gateway for a small network (under 30 users)Gw will host the following services:shorewalldnsproxy i''m considering installing snort.can i do so on the same exact box ? is there any security risk of doing so ? box would have 4 ISPs and two internal interfaces. Any recommendation about the optimal setup of snort and shorewall (or if you suggest

Hello, I have started playing around with docker (https://www.docker.io/) and am having trouble to integrate the "docker0" bridge it creates on the fly into my shorewall setup (version 4.5.16.1) on debian testing. IP forwarding is on and I have defined a "doc" ipv4 zone and the interfaces has an entry like so, > doc docker0

I''m using the following rule on 3 different systems running shorewall-4.5.18 on Gentoo: ACCEPT all all icmp - - - 10/sec:20 shorewall starts fine on 2 of the systems but on the 3rd it fails to start with the following error: iptables-restore: line 119 failed ERROR: iptables-restore Failed. Input is in /var/lib/shorewall/.iptables-restore-input /usr/share/shorewall/lib.common: line 113:

Hi folks, I''m having an issue with rsync between my firewall and an internal box. It seems to be a shorewall issue (or correctly speaking, an issue with my shorewall config) because if I disable shorewall my rsync works fine. And I just can''t find it documented anywhere what I need to do. I have rules like this : root@userver:/etc/shorewall# grep -i Rsync rules

hello need a little help i have 2 NIC router with shorewall client PCs goes to internet fine with shorewall help. but i need to reroute traffic for one net via other gateway not ISPs. Gateway is on LAN NIC. 192.168.1.0/24 LAN x.x.x.x WAN router(shorewall) IP 192.168.1.15 i need to reroute traffic for 192.168.2.0/24 network to 192.168.1.1 gateway I know how to do it via route and iptables, bu just

I give up and need help! I won''t add to the confusion by showing all the combinations I have tried unsuccessfully... and yes, I''ve read FAQ2 and FAQ2a many times! When googling the subject of this post there are many answers that boil down to using the same three iptables rules, two of which use nat. I won''t repeat them here. I don''t want to risk mixing

Hi, I have servers where shorewall6 won''t reject nor log: # cat /etc/shorewall6/zones fw firewall net ipv6 # cat /etc/shorewall6/interfaces net eth1 tcpflags (I also tried without "tcpflags", but no changes) # cat /etc/shorewall6/policy $FW all ACCEPT all all REJECT info # cat /etc/shorewall6/rules SECTION NEW (for testing, I removed all the rules) I am testing from

Hi, I want to configure QoS in my shorewall conf but I have a doubt. Now I am using tcrules with prerouting and with the file providers, like this. 2:P 192.168.0.11 0.0.0.0/0 tcp 25 So, with this way I route my smtp traffic with my provider number 2. Well, now I want to configure QoS with tcclasses and tcdevices, but if I do that I need to use the MARK in the tcclasses So, how

the establishment of an openvpn link sometimes fails. I tracked it down to network traffic with wrong Sourceport in the answer packet (should be 1300 not 1024): 2 1.119309000 aaa.185.165 bbb.162.192 UDP 58 Source port: 1300 Destination port: 1300 3 1.119446000 bbb.162.192 aaa.185.165 UDP 66 Source port: 1024 Destination port: 1300 and a collateral entry in the connection tracking table

Hi, My main gateway is a router running on OpenWrt Barrier Breaker r37816/ Kernel Version3.10.4. I installed shorewall-lite from openwrt''s repo using opkg but while trying to start shorewall-lite I get the folowing errors: The first error i got was "scp: /var/lib/shorewall-lite: No such file or directory" simply resolved by making the folder "shorewall-lite"

I''m trying to use my VPS server (single interface of course) as somewhat of a VPN gateway to my other location (which is not accessible directly from some places) where the openvpn server is running, and am kind of lost as to what to try next. I tried a redirect rule, but apparently shorewall didn''t like that (it just failed to start). I tried adding the rules via

Hi to all For is just az concept question : There are a need to change something in Squid3 config when it are running in the same box as shorewall with 2 ISP ? I''ve been thinking in do this at home, as a proof of concept for future implememtations ... I allways use Roberto''s Debian package to implement Shorewall . Fábio Rabelo

Hi all, I need an help to implement this kind of rules on shorewall: iptables --insert INPUT -p udp --dport 53 -m u32 --u32 "0x28&0xFFDFDFDF=0x055a5a47 && 0x2c&0xDFDFFFDF=0x53540343 && 0x30&0xDFDFFFFF=0x4f4d0000" -j DROP This kind of rules need to block a DNS Amplification Attack. I found this file

Hi Has anybody tried to combine shorewall (instead of iptables) with packetfence? /Göran ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and

Shorewall 4.5.20 is now available for download. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. P R O B L E M S C O R R E C T E D I N T H I S R E L E A S E ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) On some distributions, the shorewall-lite and shorewall6-lite uninstallers could fail with a syntax error. 2) A

Hi, I use shorewall-4.5.4 + lsm-0.143 and it does not seem to work as expected... When all providers are up, everything seems fine. When one goes down, lsm says "link <provider> down event"... and it seems ok but we then experience some problems such as a few unreachable sites, DNS problems... If I remove the downed provider from all confs and restart, everything works again.