similar to: Fail to login from trusted AD: NT_STATUS_TRUSTED_DOMAIN_FAILURE

There are multiple problems/questions here: 1. Make sure you've updated trunk to the latest rev before running update_llc_test_checks.py on lea-3.ll. Ie, I would only expect the output you're seeing if you're running the script on a version of that test file before r313631. After that commit, each RUN has its own check prefix, so there should be no conflict opportunity. 2. I

Hi Sanjay, thanks for this information. I did get a little bit further with the patch. However, Hexagon gives me headaches. I tried to limit the scope of the patch to the BeforeLegalizeTypes phase and Hexagon still reaches the unreachable. Hexagon tries to split or widen a vector type for a node with custom lowering where the unreachable arises from inside TargetLowering::ReplaceNodeResults

Is VT a legal type on Hexagon? It looks like Hexagon may be setting SHL as Custom for every defined vector type. Try adding TLI.isTypeLegal(VT) too. ~Craig On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Haidl, Michael < michael.haidl at uni-muenster.de> wrote: > Hi Sanjay, > > thanks for this information. I did get a little bit further with the > patch. However, Hexagon gives me headaches.

Hi Craig, protecting the transformation with: if (TLI.isTypeLegal(VT) && TLI.isOperationLegal(ISD::SUB, VT) && TLI.isOperationLegal(ISD::ADD, VT) && TLI.isOperationLegal(ISD::SHL, VT) && TLI.isOperationLegal(ISD::SRA, VT)) { shows the same result. Michael On 22.09.2017 07:19, Craig Topper wrote: > Is VT a legal type on Hexagon?

Hi All, Answering to myself, this problem still occurs again and again, every week as I mentioned before. Rejoining the domain each time for samba4 file server is the only workaround. What could be the origin of this kind of problem? Any answer would be helpfull Regards Le 17/07/2017 à 10:12, Julien TEHERY a écrit : > Hello, > > > We recently put in place a trust relationship

Hi, I am currently working on a more or less intrusive patch (D37896), which pulls optimizations on multiplications from some back-ends, e.g., (mul x, 2^N + 1) => (add (shl x, N), x) in AArch64, into the DAGCombiner to have this optimization generic on all targets. However, running the LLVM Tests leads to 67 unexpected results. Am 19.09.2017 um 15:58 schrieb Sanjay Patel: > For the

Hello I wonder if anyone here could possibly help me? I am using Samba version 4.5.16-Debian (version information taken from sudo smbstatus) on Raspbian and attempting to prototype some future network infrastructure with a couple of Raspberry Pis. So far I have sucessfully created a Samba 4 AD DC ad1.samdom.example.com. I have successfully joined my Windows 10 dekstop client to the SAMDOM

Hi Guys. Today i experienced a problem with my samba 4 AD. I have a master(AD1) and a member(AD2) in a replicated environment. I´ve just checked that my AD2 has some issues when i did this test: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ldbsearch --url=/usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb '(invocationid=*)' --cross-ncs objectguid # record 1 dn:

Hi, I have an Active Directory with a single domain and 2 domain controllers: AD1 and AD2, both are on different sites (and subnets). I've initiallly insatlled AD1 and then joined AD2 to the domain. I've found that if I join desktop computers to the domain using AD1 as DNS, it joins successfully and propagates the change to AD2, but if I try to join a computer using AD2 as DNS, then the

Hi All, I am currently running a setup with a main DC ad1, that has ntpd installed and is currently configured to retrieve the time from the UK NTP time pool. I also have a second backup AD DC, ad2, on which I have not installed ntpd but I have installed ntpdate. My current understanding is that the setup I have just described is in-line with the recommended best practices outlined in the

Hi everyone, I have two AD DCs that I am experimenting with, hostnames ad1 and ad2 respectively. I am using Raspberry Pi hardware, and accordingly I am using Samba 4.5.16-Debian on Raspbian Linux. I have already had some success so far setting up a second AD DC, ad2, and joining this to my existing Active Directory domain SAMDOM. I have already verified that I can create new user accounts on

Hello list, I'm having some difficulty getting rJava to load in littler. Even after a R CMD javareconf and a reinstall of littler, I get this: jlaing at xenon:~$ r -e "require(rJava)" Loading required package: rJava Loading required package: methods Error : .onLoad failed in loadNamespace() for 'rJava', details: call: dyn.load(file, DLLpath = DLLpath, ...) error: unable

Hello Everyone, I have been tasked to work on consolidating authentication to achieve single sign-on using Active Directory. We have mix of Linux and Windows Hosts. All Linux hosts do local authentication currently and Windows hosts authenticates Active directory. I have been thinking of using Samba to authenticate Linux Hosts against Active Directory. I am fairly confident of configuring

I have 2 ADSL ad1 and ad2 , one PC for my firewall and some deamon on it with 3 ethernet : eth0 connect to my LAN ( 192.168.60.0/24 ) and 2 other connect to ad1 and ad2 |eth1 (10.0.1.2)--------------------ad1 ( ADSL 1 ) | My LAN(192.168.60.0/24) |---------eth0( 192.168.60.2)--> PC | |eth2 (10.0.2.2)---------------------ad2 (ADSL 2 ) All computer in LAN has default router =

Hello, I have installed an samba ad1 and an samba ad2 with replication. On the dc1 "samba-tool drs showrepl" say "... was successful" On dc2 there is the same. When dc1 goes down I get an Error (on my client): Active Directory Users and Computers error: "server is not operational" What is wrong here? For my understand that is no Replication, when one goes down and

With a lot of help, I just got AD authentication working (Samba 4.8.3, CentOS 7.6, using Winbind). I then added a local account to a share, but I can’t login. My smb.conf has “security = ads”, but I can’t figure out how to use that AND authenticate local users. How can I authenticate Active Directory AND local users? Brian

Hi Rowland, I made the change you suggested to auto refresh kerberos. It didn't seem to fix the issue unfortunately, even after a machine restart. Following your line of reasoning that it is a Kerberos issue, I then tried to grab a new kerberos ticket on the server in question which appears to fail though. Perhaps this gives some further insight? pi at fs1:~ $ kinit administrator at

For the tests that are changing, you should see if those changes are improvements, regressions, or neutral. This is unfortunately not always obvious for x86 asm, so feel free to just post those diffs in an updated version of the patch at D37896. If the test files have auto-generated assertions (look for this string on the first line of the test file: "NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated

We've joined an RODC to the domain (Windows 2008R2 running a W2003 FFL/DFL AD) but are getting these errors on first startup. It was joined with: samba-tool domain join main.adlab.netdirect.ca RODC --realm=main.adlab.netdirect.ca --username=administrator at main.adlab.netdirect.ca --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ but we get these errors right after startup: Nov 28 12:35:27 sles-bree samba[3939]:

Cheers Louis, i just ran the diagnostic snippet you sent me: pi at ad1:/var/lib/samba/private $ sudo ls -al $(samba -b | grep STATEDIR | awk {' print $NF '})/sysvol total 20 drwxrwx---+ 3 root 3000000 4096 Mar 25 16:36 . drwxr-xr-x  8 root root    4096 Mar 25 17:31 .. drwxrwx---+ 4 root 3000000 4096 Mar 25 16:36 samdom.example.com pi at ad2:/var/lib/samba/private $ sudo ls -al $(samba