similar to: CentOS-6 on Toshiba Toughbook CF-31

Does anyone here use a Samba4 setup for single sign-on for MS_Win workstations and CentOS-6 boxes? Does anyone here use it for imap and/or smtp authentication? We are experimenting with replacing our existing Microsoft domain controllers with Samba4 based controllers and are contemplating moving all authentication for all our systems, Microsoft and CentOS based, over to Samba when, or if, this

After a long, and quite disheartening, series of hardware problems with my HP laptop I decided to try out a Mac (late 2009 Intel based 19.5 inch). In the months since January past I have discovered this to be no significant improvement and I have grown tired of the persistent wireless connectivity problems and am totally put off by the upgrade to OSX-10.6.4 which killed HD graphics using Open-Gl.

Are these packages still available for RHEL6/CentOS6? If so then where does one get them? If not then have they been replaced with something else? There does not seem to be a listing for them at epel. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley

We encountered a problem with respect to KVM virtual host restore and NTP. Specifically, our VM test host was shutdown by an extended power outage and when power returned all of the restored guests were immediately shutdown by ntp because the time differential between the restored systems and that of the ntpd sync servers exceeded the panic threshold. This is not an acceptable situation so in the

I am nearing the end of a project that moved our disparate services and hosts onto kvm virtualized servers. What I am now contemplating is setting up my desktop as a virtual host and using one of the guests as my primary workstation. However, I am not sure how this would work in practice. I am accustomed to working with virtual instances via ssh (a terminal window) and with my desktop system in

This morning I received this report of a change to the SELinux context of /etc/posfix/main.cf on one of our hosts. from: system_u:object_r:postfix_etc_t:s0 to: unconfined_u:object_r:postfix_etc_t:s0 The contents of the file have been verified as unchanged. There was a yum update applied yesterday to this host and this may be an intended alteration. However, can anyone confirm this for me?

On Fri, December 5, 2014 04:53, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > On 12/04/2014 03:22 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> On Thu, December 4, 2014 12:29, James B. Byrne wrote: >>> Re: SELinux. Do I just build a local policy or is there some boolean >>> setting >>> needed to handle this? I could not find one if there is but. . . >>> >> Anyone see any problem

I am contemplating converting some of our internal networks from routable to private IPv4 address space. I have a question about RIP as implemented under Cisco IOS 12.x. Presently the setting for rip is: router rip version 2 passive-interface [[FastEthernet]]0/0 network aaa.bbb.ccc.0 no auto-summary What I would like to know is how one routes the entire 192.168/16 address space using rip.

Firstly, let me thank all of the individuals who assisted me in various matters regarding find, tar and ssh last week. Your contributions were truly invaluable and I learned a great deal thereby. The reason for that brief flurry of activity was an administrative and technical move to store-to-disc from store-to-tape for our server backups. We presently use a mix of store to disc on

On Thu, July 21, 2016 07:56, Jose Maria Terry Jimenez wrote: > El 21/7/16 a las 8:53, geo.inbox.ignore escribi?: > >> greetings to all. >> >> centos = 6.8 current >> system = toshiba l455d-s5976 laptop >> >> a new problem has developed after 1st updating of 6.8. >> >> regular user is not able to open kde desktop, can open >> gnome

I changed the entries in smb4.conf (smb.conf) to this: [global] . . . dns update command = /usr/local/sbin/samba_dnsupdate nsupdate command = /usr/local/bin/samba-nsupdate -d -g And this is what results when I run: samba_dnsupdate --verbose -d8 --all-names . . . update(nsupdate): SRV _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.ForestDnsZones.brockley.harte-lyne.ca

This is all the diagnostic information I can think of at the moment: [root at smb4-1 ~ (master)]# klist Credentials cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 Principal: administrator at BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA Issued Expires Principal Jul 2 10:35:11 2020 Jul 2 20:35:11 2020 krbtgt/BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA at BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA [root at smb4-1 ~ (master)]# grep nsup

> Could be because you added the wrong line to your smb4.conf (why does > freebsd call it smb4.conf ?), Why does freebsd put these things in /usr/local/etc/? Some questions have answers that are not worth the effort to know. > try: > nsupdate command = /usr/local/sbin/nsupdate -g I did catch that error earlier. But it makes no difference. samba_dnsupdate does not give any

Thank you for your patience. On Tue, June 30, 2020 16:48, Rowland penny wrote: > > From 'man smb.conf': > > nsupdate command (G) > > This option sets the path to the nsupdate command which is used for > GSS-TSIG dynamic DNS updates. > > Default: nsupdate command = /usr/bin/nsupdate -g > > dns update command (G) > > This

I am seeing these avc messages on a newly commissioned and up-to-date CentOs-6 virtual guest: ---- time->Thu Dec 4 12:14:58 2014 type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1417713298.610:60522): arch=c000003e syscall=2 success=no exit=-13 a0=7fd70e6de1e6 a1=0 a2=1b6 a3=0 items=0 ppid=2698 pid=4294 auid=0 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=2784 comm="trivial-rewrite"

I am testing DC administration using samba-4.10.15 on FreeBSD-12.1p6 and have run across this: [root at smb4-2 ~ (master)]# samba-tool domain join BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA DC -U"BROCKLEY\administrator" INFO 2020-06-25 14:26:10,692 pid:47306 /usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/samba/join.py #104: Finding a writeable DC for domain 'BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA' INFO 2020-06-25

I have introduced some error in my dns resolution and I would like some help fixing it as I cannot seem to detect what I have done wrong. Briefly the setup is this: name servers: DNS01 - 216.185.71.33 DNS02 - 209.47.176.33 DNS03 - 216.185.71.34 DNS04 - 209.47.176.34 - offline DNS01 is a master DNS02-04 are slaves of 216.185.71.33 All are listed as authoritative for the zone test.com The

CentOS-5.4 i86_64 I have a calculator applet on my desktop (superbcalc.jar). When I double click on it I get no response. If I right click and select open with java I get no response. If I open a terminal window and cd to Desktop and type java -jar superbcalc.jar then the applet opens. Does anyone have any idea why I am seeing this behaviour? There are no messages in the syslog file relating

i86_64 CentOS-6.5 Samba-4.1.4-7 (sernet) MS-Win2000 Advanced Server AD DC I am following the HowTo provided at https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC. I am at this point: ---> In this case, 737506d0-bfe6-40c8-815d-08c3dff7a67f is the objectGUID of the new DC, we'll query with the following command: # host -t CNAME

We are at the stage, finally, where we are prepared to deploy public facing VM guests. Now we have to answer these questions: How many guests in total should we contemplate and what services are placed on which guests? My question comes down to whether it is considered advisable to run the primary DNS and IMAP, or indeed all services, on separate vm guests; or should we continue, more or less,