similar to: Native Parallelization in rsync

Hello, >From what I see with my current tinc setup, to add a new node to the network, I need to generate a certificate and exchange it with at least one already-connected (let's call it "known") node. I can easily give the known node's certs to other clients, but getting other nodes' certificates into the known node's config is non-trivial. Is there a way to join the

Hi all, I am looking appropriate Benchmarking for the assessment of automatic parallelization project. What Benchmarking do you suggest me? regards neda -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111201/95e7779c/attachment.html>

Hi Hal, > For auto-vectorization, look at: > http://polaris.cs.uiuc.edu/~garzaran/doc/pact11.pdf > http://polaris.cs.uiuc.edu/~maleki1/TSVC.tar.gz > > If you're looking for auto-parallelization, I can ask around. Thanks for the sharing. If that doesn't bother you too much, I would like to know auto-parallelization benchmarks. :p Just curious. I was thinking that

On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 11:53 +0800, 陳韋任 wrote: > > I am looking appropriate Benchmarking for the assessment of automatic > > parallelization project. What Benchmarking do you suggest me? > > Do you mean auto-parallelization or auto-vectorization? If it's the latter, I > sugguest you find scientific or graphic applications. For auto-vectorization, look at:

> I am looking appropriate Benchmarking for the assessment of automatic > parallelization project. What Benchmarking do you suggest me? Do you mean auto-parallelization or auto-vectorization? If it's the latter, I sugguest you find scientific or graphic applications. I don't think there is auto-parallelization benchmark, however. Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer

Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> writes: > As I've stated, whether the metadata is preserved is not really the > relevant metric. It is fine for a pass that does not understand > parallelization metadata to drop it. The important part is that dropping > the metadata, and moving instructions to which that metadata is > attached, must not cause miscompiles. For example:

On 03/22/2011 01:56 PM, Reid Kleckner wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Gokul Ramaswamy > <gokulhcramaswamy at gmail.com <mailto:gokulhcramaswamy at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi Duncan Sands, > > As I have understood, GOMP and OpenMP provides support for > parallelizing program at source program level. But I am at the IR > level. That

Hi Duncan Sands, As I have understood, GOMP and OpenMP provides support for parallelizing program at source program level. But I am at the IR level. That is I am trying to parallelize the IR code. This is the case of automatic parallelization. The programmer writing the code does not have any idea of parallelization going behind the hood. So my question is instead of support at the source

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Gokul Ramaswamy <gokulhcramaswamy at gmail.com > wrote: > Hi Duncan Sands, > > As I have understood, GOMP and OpenMP provides support for > parallelizing program at source program level. But I am at the IR level. > That is I am trying to parallelize the IR code. This is the case of > automatic parallelization. The programmer writing the

On Oct 1, 2012, at 10:37 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:26:54 -0700 > Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Oct 1, 2012, at 6:16 PM, greened at obbligato.org wrote: >> >>> Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> writes: >>> >>>> In short, I propose a

On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 22:56:50 -0700 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 1, 2012, at 10:37 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > > On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:26:54 -0700 > > Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> On Oct 1, 2012, at 6:16 PM, greened at obbligato.org wrote: > >>

Hi Gokul Ramaswamy, > I am new to LLVM. So please help me out. Here is what I am trying to > achieve: > > If there are 2 statements in a source program - > S1; > S2; > > and I know these is no data and control dependency between them and > both take large amount of time to execute. So I want to execute them > in parallel. >

Hi, On 08/10/2012 11:06 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > I'd like to see support in clang/LLVM for multi-core parallelism, > especially support for OpenMP. I think that the best way to do this is > by designing an LLVM-based API (metadata and intrinsics) for > expressing parallelism constructs, and having clang lower OpenMP code > to that API. This will allow maximal preservation

Hi, I am looking into something similar as well for auto-parallelization i.e. some sort of low level support at the IR level for parallelization. I'd be interested in collaborating with anyone who is working on the same. >From a brief look at the architectural overview of Polly, it seems as if the parallel code generation is being done at the IR level since the input file is an LLVM IR

Hi, Le 02/10/2012 19:29, Hal Finkel a écrit : > On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 22:56:50 -0700 > Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> On Oct 1, 2012, at 10:37 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >>> On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:26:54 -0700 >>> Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >>>> On Oct 1, 2012, at 6:16 PM, greened at

Hi, I know LLVM provides thread-level automatic parallel support using OpenMP (see  http://blog.llvm.org/2015/05/openmp-support_22.html), but it is not clear for me which of the following is correct? 1. Clang inserts in the source code OpenMP compiler directives, so, it auto-parallelizes the serial source code provided as input or2. Clang can compile manually written parallel source code that uses

Hi All, I am new to LLVM. So please help me out. Here is what I am trying to achieve: If there are 2 statements in a source program - S1; S2; and I know these is no data and control dependency between them and both take large amount of time to execute. So I want to execute them in parallel. So as S1 starts executing, I want to launch another thread and

On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 1, 2012, at 6:16 PM, greened at obbligato.org wrote: > >> Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> writes: >> >>> In short, I propose a intrinsic based approach which hinges on the >>> concept of a "parallel map". The immediate effect of using

On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:26:54 -0700 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 1, 2012, at 6:16 PM, greened at obbligato.org wrote: > > > Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> writes: > > > >> In short, I propose a intrinsic based approach which hinges on the > >> concept of a "parallel map". The immediate

On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 10:56:47 -0700 Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> > wrote: > > > > On Oct 1, 2012, at 6:16 PM, greened at obbligato.org wrote: > > > >> Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> writes: > >> > >>> In short, I propose a