Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "KVM - Network bridge issue - lots of overruns"
2017 Jun 26
0
Accepting RELATED, ESTABLISHED (TCP) connections into VM using Network Filters
Hi,
Over the past few days I've been trying to get a prototype working of a stateful firewall for a Virtual Machine using Libvirt's network filters.
My goal is to replace the current custom Python/Java code in the Apache CloudStack [0] project by Network Filters of Libvirt.
Both IPv4 and IPv6 should work, but I started off with IPv4 and I have issues with accepting back
2019 Jan 02
0
Re: macvtap and tagged VLANs to the VM
On 12/16/18 4:59 PM, Marc Haber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to run a network firewall as a VM on a KVM host. There are
> ~ 25 VLANs delivered to the KVM host on three dedicated links, no LACP
> or other things. I have the VLANs 100-180 on the host's enp1s0, the VLANs
> 200-280 on the host's enp2s0 and the VLANs 300-380 on the host's enp3s0.
>
> To save
2012 Jul 12
1
[ovs-discuss] OpenVswitch with KVM virtual machines
I am running NOX controller with a python script that prints out the
destination mac and the source mac for each packet arriving at the now
controller and then floods it out. So here's what happening:
With em1 connected, all the packets that arrive at em1 are coming to the
controller and printing out the details. However, without em1 connected to
the OVS, when I have the following setup:
2015 Sep 02
0
BUG: confusion between next-server and gateway
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Costas Drogos via Syslinux
<syslinux at zytor.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'am trying to efi-netboot a HP ProLiant DL120 Gen9[1], that has
> multiple NICs, one embedded 2-port and an extra 4-port, so I got to the
> HP/EFI/multinic problem.
HP DL120 G9 versus HP DL160 G9. Sounds like they'll be awfully similar.
> I read through the
2012 Jul 09
1
OpenVswitch with KVM virtual machines
Hey,
I have KVM installed on my Fedora 17 box. I added the network interfaces of the virtual machines to the openvswitch bridge as follows:
____ ____
/ VM1\______br0_______/ em1\
\____/ | \____/
|
_|_
/VM2\
\____/
virbr0 is the virtual network switch
VM1 and VM2 are on the same subnet having tap interfaces vnet0 and vnet1 respectively.
em1 is the default
2020 Oct 21
2
about the script /etc/qemu-ifup with nmcli command
Hi,
I have tried the qemu-ifup script as below with nmcli command as brctl is
deprecated on rhel8, but the guest network can not work.
I think the script needs update. Could you please help to have a look?
Thank you in advance.
1. prepare a linux bridge on the host named br0;
2. prepare the qemu-ifup script as below:
# cat /etc/qemu-ifup
#!/bin/bash
# A br0 bridge should be already set up.
#
2015 Sep 02
2
BUG: confusion between next-server and gateway
Hello,
I'am trying to efi-netboot a HP ProLiant DL120 Gen9[1], that has
multiple NICs, one embedded 2-port and an extra 4-port, so I got to the
HP/EFI/multinic problem.
I read through the multinic mailthreads and using current master[2], it
booted successfully to syslinux but then another problem manifested:
Syslinux for some reason asks the gateway and not next-server about
ldlinux.e64 (I
2018 Dec 16
3
macvtap and tagged VLANs to the VM
Hi,
I would like to run a network firewall as a VM on a KVM host. There are
~ 25 VLANs delivered to the KVM host on three dedicated links, no LACP
or other things. I have the VLANs 100-180 on the host's enp1s0, the VLANs
200-280 on the host's enp2s0 and the VLANs 300-380 on the host's enp3s0.
To save myself from configuring all VLANs on the KVM host, I'd like to
hand the entire
2008 Nov 22
2
[Bridge] bridge changes id on addif - is that normal?
hi
i've setup the following on debian etch with bridge-utils 1.4
(backported) and kernel 2.6.26 from backports.org:
vlan10 with raw device eth0
vlan20 with raw device eth0
br10 with initial port vlan10
br20 with initial port vlan20
i've set hw addr to DE:AD:BE:EF:34:10 for br10 and DE:AD:BE:EF:34:20 for
br20
the bridges are used to connect virtual machine nic's.
"brctl
2015 Jan 21
1
openvswitch port with no ip
I used openvswitch with virt-intall
I defined a network
<network>
<name>private</name>
<bridge name='virbr0'/>
<forward mode='bridge'/>
<virtualport type='openvswitch'/>
</network>
But get no ip for the ovs port when I launch the instance. Is this
correct?
ci-info:
2009 Jan 26
1
Suggestion for a new server for E1 line
Hi All,
I'm trying to identify a new server as a replacement for what our
customer actually has (DELL PowerEdge 860).
The server will mount the Digium board TE121, we already have, with echo
cancel onboard. I need to know if someone could suggest a new server
that's compatible with this board. With "compatible" I mean that's not
having any problem like IRQ sharing, IRQ miss
2013 May 16
1
Two VF cards
Hi,
I try to add 2 VF functions to VM via network.
Livirt networks:
vnet0:
<network>
<name>vnet0</name>
<forward mode='hostdev' managed='yes'>
<pf dev='eth0'/>
</forward>
</network>
vnet1:
<network>
<name>vnet0</name>
<forward mode='hostdev' managed='yes'>
<pf
2019 Jan 13
1
forcing order of vnet creation
dummy0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C6:C8:2A:04:FD:23
BROADCAST NOARP MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:65536 Metric:1
RX
2009 Jul 27
3
Liebert Power Sure PSPXT 450 (SERIAL)
Hi!
My Liebert Power Sure PSPXT 450 with standard driver doesn't works, so I've
done this modification and now it's works.
# diff liebert_MY.c liebert.c
178
< ser_set_speed(upsfd, device_path, B9600);
---
That is, I've only setup the port's speed.
Can you update SVN code?
Thanks
Bye
Beppe Ursino
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was
2009 Oct 24
3
Need info on vnet mapping to guests
Hello:
I have a host running two KVM guests. The guests
use br0 and each has a static IP address.
I am trying to figure out if there is a way to
use snmpd on the host to measure the traffic
usage of the guests. I do not want to require
anything running on the guests since I do not
control them.
Looking at netstat -in on the host, I see this
info:
Kernel Interface table
Iface MTU Met
2012 Nov 03
1
error: Unable to add port vnet1 to OVS bridge ovsbr: Operation not permitted
Hi,
>
> I am using libvirt version 0.9.13 with Ubuntu 12.10
>
> When I try to start a VM with an openvswitch bridge interface I get the
> error:
>
> error: Failed to start domain kvm113-2
> error: Unable to add port vnet1 to OVS bridge ovsbr: Operation not
> permitted
>
>
> Here is my bridge configuration:
> <interface type='bridge'>
>
2015 Apr 24
2
Remove Virtual bridge and DNSMASQ
I am running KVM virtualization with libvirtd (libvirt) 0.10.2 in bridged
network mode, however I still have the default virtual network
bridge/interfaces and dnsmasq on the host. What I am trying to understand
is whether or not dnsmasq and the virtual network (*virbr0, Vnet0 and Vnet1*)
still play any role. If not, can I remove them?
On most virtual hosts I see they are left around even when a
2010 Mar 24
2
Problem attaching device
I keep getting an error when I try to attach a device in the libvirt api through python
The python code is:
conn=libvirt.open('qemu:///system')
dom = conn.lookupByName("fedoratest")
if dom.info()[0]==1:
dom.attachDevice('net.xml')
And I keep getting: "libvirtError: XML description not well formed or invalid
The xml is a simple network
2012 Jan 23
0
gPXE fails automatically, succeeds with manual autoboot
Hi Folks,
I'm trying to auto-create a VM using a kickstart server and gPXE with
my VMs. The underlying physical host is CentOS 6.0 running
libvirt-0.8.1-27, and libvirt-python 0.8.1-27, virt-manager 0.8.4-8.
The underlying network config on the physical host is:
# ip -o -4 addr show
1: lo inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
6: vnet0 inet 10.8.31.61/23 brd 10.8.31.255 scope global vnet0
7:
2010 Jan 31
1
poor network performance to one of two guests
G'day, I have a host running two kvm guests. One of them gets very poor network
performance, testing with iperf I get ~10MBit/sec to guest A, >400MBit/sec to
guest B (running iperf between the host/guest). Both guests are using the same
bridge:
Guest A:
<interface type='bridge'>
<mac address='54:52:00:75:24:91'/>
<source