similar to: Missing value handling for felm function in lfe package

Dear all, I am running a panel regression with time and location fixed effects: ### reg1 <- lm(lny ~ factor(id) + factor(year) + x1+ I(x1)^2 + x2+ I(x2)^2 , data=mydata, na.action="na.omit") ### My goal is to use the estimation for prediction. However, I have 8,500 IDs, which is resulting in very slow computation. Ideally, I would like to do the following: ### reg2 <-

I have no direct experience with such horrific models, but your formula is a mess and Google suggests the biglm package with ffdf. Specifically, you should convert your discrete variables to factors before you build the model, particularly since you want to use predict after the fact, for which you will need a new data set with the exact same levels in the factors. Also, your use of I() is

Is it possible to download and run R on Asus ZenFone, if yes, which version -- Dr.Megha Kamble CSE, LNCT, Bhopal [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I apologize for the terribly long message, but here goes. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- First, regarding existing tools that I now about. libavcodec and users (e.g. HandBrake): - if there are 6 channels or less, the layout is set by the decoder as per the FLAC specification - if there are more than 6 channels, the layout is

Josh Coalson wrote: > --- smoerk <smoerk@gmx.de> wrote: > >>i didn't find anything about tagging flac files as surround files. i >>think there should some possibility to tell the player how to play a >>multi-channel file (how to map the different channels to the speakers >>or if there some decode is needed, like for ambisonic files). > > > it

Now that we've selected a channel mapping for 7 and 8 channel flac, the command-line encoder tools needs updating to accept wav files with compatible channel maps. -r -------------- next part --------------

Hello All, My question is regarding the attached plot. I would like to have multiple transparent green bands running the length (yaxis) of the plot the width of which is determined by the green lines at y=0 in the plot. Can you suggest a way to do it? For those who can't or are unwilling to download the file the plot is at http://www.twitpic.com/ma8w0 Thanks!

I've been doing a fair amount of work with Vorbis support for Ambisonics, which seems to be going along nicely. It seems that there is signifant interest in coding 5.1 material with Vorbis esp as tarkin becomes more complete, so I've decided to take a break from pure ambisonic work to look into this. I've decided that the best (from a pure elegance and patent avoidance) way to handle

I've been doing a fair amount of work with Vorbis support for Ambisonics, which seems to be going along nicely. It seems that there is signifant interest in coding 5.1 material with Vorbis esp as tarkin becomes more complete, so I've decided to take a break from pure ambisonic work to look into this. I've decided that the best (from a pure elegance and patent avoidance) way to handle

On Fri Sep 21 16:31:21 2012, Stephen F. Booth wrote: > 6.1: L R C LFE Ls Rs Cs (MPEG 6.1 A layout) I'm confused. WAV puts the rear centre before everything but 'Front left of center' and 'Front right of center'. Are you saying you prefer the extra front channels to to side/rear surround, or that you prefer the MPEG order to the WAVE order? -r

i didn't find anything about tagging flac files as surround files. i think there should some possibility to tell the player how to play a multi-channel file (how to map the different channels to the speakers or if there some decode is needed, like for ambisonic files). any idea how to implement it?

Hi All, Are multi-channel (more than 2) formats fully supported in the OggVorbis specification ? I couldn't find any information about multi-channel support on xiph.org. I've used 'oggdropXPd' to encode a 5.1 wavefile and the Xiph OggVorbis libraries (vorbisfile.dll) to decode the file successfully, however the order of the channel interleaving is different to the original wave

On 12-10-12 4:47 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > I've read through this thread and it didn't really come to any > conclusion. Can we try again and make a decision this time? Anyone else have thoughts on this? I'd like to get this added before the 1.3.x release. Especially helpful would be research into what current tools actually do. -r

Hi , I am trying to optimize OPUS codec to TI compiler C64XX in CCS. I have created the make file and compiled the code in optlevel = 3. The MIPS are pretty high(99 MIPS for 8Khz stereo) for LFE channels and the most MIPS intensive function is the silk_noise_shape_quantizer_del_dec() function. 1. I am trying to convert this entire function to assembly. I have tried to incoporate .asm file but I

On 20030610: Gregory Maxwell wrote: (in reply to Ralph Giles) >> I assume you're aware of the technical documentation on dolby's site? >> (http://www.dolby.com/pro/) In particular the surround mixing guide has >> a lot of detailed guidelines. I don't have any practical experience >> with it though, so I can't vouch for it. >Yes I am. I've done a

Hey everyone, I've added Ogg Opus support to my Adobe Premiere plug-in here: http://github.com/fnordware/AdobeOgg Now I'll add Opus support to me WebM plug-in too. I've got this Opus stuff mostly figured out, but I have a few questions. Here's one: What do the numbers in mapping mean? I see that opus.h refers to the Vorbis channel mapping order, so does mapping in Opus take

The FLAC format specification never defined the semantics of 7- and 8-channel files, which has caused some pain for some years now. Attached is a patch to define them. I don't know if this follows "follows SMPTE/ITU-R recommendations," but it follows common tool practice. I chose the set of surround speaker designations used by home theatre systems, which is the same set used by the

Sampo Syreeni wrote: > Secondly, I'd like to see the channel map fleshed out in more detail. Sampo, I did flesh out the wiki a **little** more. Is the intent clearer now? > (Beware of the pet peeve...) What is that pet peeve? > IMO the mapping should cover at least the > channel assignments possible in WAVE files, the most common Ambisonic > ones, and perhaps some added

On 7/16/15, Martin Leese <martin.leese at stanfordalumni.org> wrote: > Martijn van Beurden wrote: >> I would propose: 0000-0111 : (number of independent channels)-1. >> The channel order is defined through the >> WAVEFORMATEXTENSIBLE_CHANNEL_MASK vorbis comment, if defined. If >> no WAVEFORMATEXTENSIBLE_CHANNEL_MASK is present, the channel >> order follows

Hi Everybody, I have just been introduced to R and have used the ltm package for calibrating items under IRT. I have been able to get the item parameters using the fit function under different models. I am using the 2PL model. I have got the parameters for some 300 items from 15 different tests using the function fit. Now I need to automatically generate tests such that they have atleast a