similar to: linkedin gem

HI All, I have installed the Active Admin successfully, but facing the following error while restarting the server after generating an resource. *rails generate active_admin:resource item* /home/logs/Desktop/training/RAILS/courier/app/admin/items.rb:1:in `<top (required)>'': uninitialized constant Item (NameError) from

Posted on stackoverflow but no traction yet: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12942505/why-does-using-set-trace-func-work-in-some-places-but-cause-unexpected-return-l The following is a generified part of the code in a gem I''m working on: module SomeModule class << self attr_accessor :procedure def log_events(*args) args.flatten!

When i start the server "rails s",following error message appears: => Booting WEBrick => Rails 3.0.7 application starting in development on http://0.0.0.0:3000 => Call with -d to detach => Ctrl-C to shutdown server Exiting /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-3.0.7/lib/action_dispatch/routing/mapper.rb:167:in `default_controller_and_action'': missing :controller

Hi, I am trying to add linkedin login feature in my rails application using omniauth gem..I used omniauth gem for Fb login and it''s working fine..but it''s not working for linkedin login this is my code /model/user.rb class User < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :name, :oauth_expires_at, :oauth_token, :provider, :uid def self.from_omniauth(auth)

Hi all, I''m running an application on my localhost, but the command "rails server" behaves very inconsistently. About an hour ago it ran well on another app, but got errors now. According to the errors it seemed that the server began to run but the there is something missing in the library. But I''m very new to Rails so cannot figure out what do these lines mean:

Working with modules to group certain methods. Currently I have this set up and it works: **# app/models/a.rb** class A has_history end **# lib/history.rb** module History module Model def self.included(base) base.send :extend, ClassMethods end module ClassMethods def has_history(options = {}) send :include,

On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Rekha R <rekharamapai at nitc.ac.in> wrote: > Thank you David for prompt reply. > > I tried with SmallVector. I inserted elements with push_back(). > But when I retrieve elements using pop_back_val the elements are returned > in reverse order of insertion (I mean like LIFO order). > I need this to be FIFO order. How to achieve that? >

Thank you David for prompt reply. I tried with SmallVector. I inserted elements with push_back(). But when I retrieve elements using pop_back_val the elements are returned in reverse order of insertion (I mean like LIFO order). I need this to be FIFO order. How to achieve that? Regards, Rekha On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 8:31 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > If you

Hi Folks, I hope you''re doing good. Sorry for a long email. I am just trying my best to learn something new and, need your help to understand/ sort a small issue which I am not able to figure out. I have create couple of factories and created some examples for rspec for one of my projects. I have got everything working on my local. Even, my specs are green on local for both ruby

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Rekha R <rekharamapai at nitc.ac.in> wrote: > Ok. Got it. > > If *add nsw* overflows, this results in undefined value. > But then *add* on same arguments results in well-defined value. > > Hence treating first one as redundant based on the second is acceptable. > But vice versa is not. > If they are in different code paths, sure.

Hi, Thank you David. My question was from a machine independent code analyzer/optimizer perspective where types are of less importance. Hence I felt difficult to understand the IR with the types. Rekha On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 6:44 PM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk > wrote: > On 27 Oct 2014, at 12:46, Rekha R <rekharamapai at nitc.ac.in> wrote: > > > Why

On 09/26/2013 10:51 AM, Rekha R wrote: > Hi, > > Would like to know the parsing strategy used in LLVM - top-down, > bottom-up, or any other? > > -- > Rekha > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > Do

If you don't care about efficiency you can push (or at least insert) at the front of a(small or otherwise) vector. On Nov 3, 2013 3:32 AM, "Rekha R" <rekharamapai at nitc.ac.in> wrote: > Hi, > > I am writing an analysis which requires creating worklist of basic blocks. > The worklist should be in FIFO order. I checked SmallVector (and similar > others) and found

Hi! I write a gem at the moment. The Gem need to register during the process in the rack middleware. So I make an folder "rack" inside my "lib" folder. I called the file "request.rb" because it keeps track of requests. So we speaking about the file /lib/rack/request.rb But even if I place an empty file on this, I get the following:

> -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On > Behalf Of "C. Bergström" > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 7:39 AM > To: Rekha R > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] on compiling FORTRAN programs > > On 07/15/14 09:29 PM, Rekha R wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am

Hi, I plan to implement an algorithm which requires BasicBlocks to have at most two predecessors. simplifycfg pass is not a choice since it doesn't do what I want, going by its description. Could someone point me to an existing pass which does this job? Thanks, -- Rekha -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi all, I am trying to upgrade my rails 2 app to 3 and am getting this error when trying to login: NoMethodError in AuthenticateController#authenticate undefined method `to_sym'' for nil:NilClass The stack trace is: activerecord (3.2.2) lib/active_record/validations/uniqueness.rb:26:in `validate_each'' activemodel (3.2.2) lib/active_model/validator.rb:153:in

On Oct 3, 2013 11:47 PM, "Rekha R" <rekharamapai at nitc.ac.in> wrote: > > Hi, > > I was trying to write a sample optimization pass in LLVM, by following instructions in LLVM doc for Writing a New Pass. But then ran into make issues. The issue is with having separate source and build directories. The LLVM doc for 'Getting Started' suggests keeping the two

Hi, Would like to know the parsing strategy used in LLVM - top-down, bottom-up, or any other? -- Rekha -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130926/329f7027/attachment.html>

I am using Rails 2.3.8 application and when I enter rake command it gives following error : ms@ms-HP:~/OpenStreetView$ rake WARNING: ''require ''rake/rdoctask'''' is deprecated. Please use ''require ''rdoc/task'' (in RDoc 2.4.2+)'' instead. at /home/ms/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194@global/gems/rake-0.9.2.2/lib/rake/rdoctask.rb rake