similar to: Need a bit help on "module_function" method

Hi, I starting a new project, and have run into behavior I cannot replicate in irb, (i.e. outside of using rspec) when the directory? returns true, so I thought I''d ask here, in case any one has seen this badhavior. ruby-1.9.2-p136 rspec (2.5.0) rspec-core (2.5.1) rspec-expectations (2.5.0) rspec-mocks (2.5.0) When I try to run this spec: require Pathname(__FILE__).ascend { |d|

Hi! If I have a method that is useful in both models and in views, where would be the appropriate place to put it? The method in question just takes two dates as strings, tries to parse them and returns all dates in the range between them. It also takes care of the issues when the dates are badly formatted etc etc.. This method is being used in several models (so a simple class method in

Hi all, I expect I'm getting something wrong, but cat("foo bar baz foo bar baz foo bar baz", fill = 10) should be broken into lines of width 10, whereas I get: > cat("foo bar baz foo bar baz foo bar baz", fill = 10) foo bar baz foo bar baz foo bar baz This is on R 3.4.3, but I don't see mentions of it fixed in 3.4.4 or r-devel NEWS. Cheers, David

[Was initially posted on cfe-users, sorry.] Hi, I'm sorry my message is quite long, the TL;DR version is "g++ and clang++ seem to have different opinions on how RTTI, templates, and ELF visibility should interact". I can't tell whether this is a bug or not: I have found no relevant documentation that could help me decide whether this behavior is meant, or not. All I can say

Don''t know if i should write this to rails or ruby mailinglist. But in the case i wan''t to extend the facebooker-plugin without touching it, i will here. 1. Instance-Methods of modules? The methods in a module may be instance methods or module methods. Instance methods appear as methods in a class when the module is included, module methods do not. Conversely, module methods may

Howdy, [Please preserve the CC to 424919-forwarded at bugs.debian.org on any replies.] The following bug in Markdown was reported to the Debian bug tracking system. In short, running both the released version of Markdown and the latest beta on * foo > bar > baz produces invalid HTML. ----- Forwarded message from Joey Hess <joeyh at debian.org> ----- From: Joey Hess <joeyh

How can I do this?: foo { name: $bar => "frob" } define foo( $bar = false, $baz = false ) { if #$bar and $baz both defined $cmd = "frobnicate --bar=$bar --baz=$baz ${name}" else if #$bar defined $cmd = "frobnicate --bar=$bar ${name}" else if #$baz defined $cmd = "frobnicate --baz=$baz ${name}" else

Suppose I have a string of objects names: name <- c("foo", "bar", "baz") and I would like to use a for loop to automatically create three objects called "foo", "bar" and "baz" accordingly. Then how can this be done" (so that in the workspace, foo = 1, bar = 2 and baz=3) for (i in name) { ..... } Thanks! Mark

Hi, I have a situation where I want to delete some of my excluded patterns but still want to preserve some other. For example consider below source and destination directory hierarchy. Source Dest ---------- --------- /foo/bar/ /foo/bar/ | -> baz | -> baz | -> xyz | -> xyz | ->

14:50 < cbosdonnat> pino|work, do you know how I could get ?tar passed from one function to the other in the checksum code? 14:51 < pino|work> cbosdonnat: pass it as it is, ie ?foo 14:52 < cbosdonnat> pino|work, indeed, works better... I didn't know I could use the ? in the calling function and I used the ~ instead 14:53 < pino|work> ? is handled like an option type

Hi John, there?s a bug in Markdown.pl: [foo*bar](#) [baz*quux](#) This expands to the following: <p><a href="#">foo<em>bar</a> <a href="#">baz</em>quux</a></p> Those `*` should either be disregarded or the tags should nest correctly: 1. <p><a href="#">foo*bar</a> <a

Is there a cheat-sheet anywhere that describes how to do SQL-like manipulations on a data frame? My knowledge of R is rather limited. But from my experience it seems as though one can think of data frames as being similar to tables in a database: there are rows, columns, and values. Also, one can perform similar manipulations on a data frame as one can on a table. For example:

Dear list members, After further testing, I found that the following simplified version of model.matrix.lme(), which omits passing xlev to the default method, is more robust. The previous version generated spurious warnings in some circumstances. model.matrix.lme <- function(object, ...){ data <- object$data if (is.null(data)){ NextMethod(formula(object),

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:53 PM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > I think you're jumping ahead a bit here. I'm not sure the semantics are > anywhere near as weird as you're framing them to be. :) I now think this weirdness actually does not have to do anything with guard_on or bail_to_interpeter, but it has to do with deopt bundles itself. Our

Hi, I find it would be very convenient to nest resources in two levels, so a member is only sensible as a part of a club, and a fee pament is only sensible in the context of a club and a member. Is it possible to nest nested resources? How would the syntax be? I have tried just nesting the assignment in routes.rb, but failed to get it right What do ou think? Is it possible? /Fredrik --

After looking at the Livermore for a while, we found the issue that was causing LTO to produce a different result. Consider the code below [1]. setup() doesn't touch bar/baz, main() doesn't reference foo. LTO finds, correctly, that it can remove the setup(), but the result is different. The code is clearly wrong, but the compiler has no right to fix user's stupidity, even at that

Hi, > If yes then this doesnt look all that bad or invasive at first sight (if > the put_user() workaround can be expressed in a cleaner way), but in any > case it would be nice to hear an LLVM person's opinion about roughly when > this is going to be solved in LLVM itself. one thing that seems to be clear to everyone except me is... what are the semantics supposed to be? [My

Hi, I read below lines in rsync v3.0.5 for --relative option. if you used this command: rsync -av /foo/bar/baz.c remote:/tmp/ ... this would create a file named baz.c in /tmp/ on the remote machine. If instead you used rsync -avR /foo/bar/baz.c remote:/tmp/ then a file named /tmp/foo/bar/baz.c would be created on the remote machine, preserving its full path It is also possible to limit the

Hello again, all: When downloading a file from the puppetmaster''s fileserver, like so: ==========SNIP========== define install_file ($mode = 0644, $owner = ''root'', $group = ''root'') { file { "${name}": source => [ "puppet://${puppetserver}/dist/files/${name}_${operatingsystem}",

Googling for this has not solved my problems. Is there a particular site that is recommened for its examples and tutorials on Rails'' AJAX capabilities? I know exactly what I want to do, just not how to do it, and am looking for some code to pore over. 1) I have a dropdown that represents the name of an image in a library. When the dropdown value is changed, I would like to refresh