similar to: [Bug 10547] nouveau: __ucmpdi2 unresolved on ppc32

Ping, NAKAMURA san, thank you. Bill san, can you comment this commit? r154798 still fails on ppc32-lnux b/c *only* for this test. Loving more minor arch, the world will be better... 2012/04/04 23:26 NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com>: > Kimura san, > > You may ask committer of r153706. I wonder if it could be x86-independent. > >>

Hi, CodeGen/Generic/dbg-declare.ll is really generic test? $ make check llvm[0]: Running test suite make[1]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-9999/work/llvm-9999/test' Making a new site.exp file... Making LLVM 'lit.site.cfg' file... Making LLVM unittest 'lit.site.cfg' file... ( ulimit -t 600 ; ulimit -d 512000 ; ulimit -m 512000 ; ulimit -v 1024000 ; \

Kimura san, You may ask committer of r153706. I wonder if it could be x86-independent. > /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-9999/work/llvm-9999/Release/bin/llc: > error auto-selecting target for module 'No available targets are > compatible with this triple, see -version for the available targets.'. >  Please use the -march option to explicitly pick a target. ...Takumi as

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10547 --- Comment #11 from Danny <obiwan at mailmij.org> 2008-03-13 01:15:37 PST --- I just add here a link to marcheu's patch to do this in drm instead (to make it easy for ppl who want to avoid rebuilding their kernel: http://icps.u-strasbg.fr/~marchesin/nvdri/ucmpdi2.diff d. -- Configure bugmail:

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10547 Stephane Marchesin <marchesin at icps.u-strasbg.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #12 from Stephane

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10547 bjt23 at cornell.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjt23 at cornell.edu ------- Comment #5 from bjt23 at cornell.edu 2007-11-12 01:56 PST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > More

I want to run dhcp and shorewall on the same computer.It is my gateway and that computer doing NAT for my network.How can I set up shorewall to let only users that get theire static ip address via dhcp, not to let users that had static address.

Se ha borrado un texto insertado con un juego de caracteres sin especificar... Nombre: no disponible Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20070828/6641b572/attachment.pl

The _start stuff was changed some time ago, but ppc was not updated. This fixes klibc for me. I'm not sure what to do with the second arg to __libc_init, so I set it to 0.. However, looking at other static binaries, there is more stuff todo. diff -p -purNx linux -x '.*.d' -x syscalls -x socketcalls y/klibc-0.87/klibc/arch/ppc/crt0.S klibc-0.87/klibc/arch/ppc/crt0.S ---

Hello ppc32 users, I think I finally got the "official" answer on the ppc32 problem. Apparently some distributions build binutils so that it defaults to elf32ppc emulation rather than elf32ppclinux. This doesn't matter when using gcc, since gcc overrides the emulation explicitly, but it does matter when invoking ld directly like klibc does. This patch should hopefully take

Hello, Michael > Hi, I'm guessing that no one has tried this exact combination yet. Some quick notes, which can be not connected to your problem. 1. You might need the following patch for FP constants to work properly: diff --git a/gcc/llvm-convert.cpp b/gcc/llvm-convert.cpp index 4c9c8d0..db8c6ba 100644 --- a/gcc/llvm-convert.cpp +++ b/gcc/llvm-convert.cpp @@ -5157,11 +5157,6 @@ Constant

Hi there, it's me again. attached is preliminary support for tail calls on ppc 32. (once i get access to a 64bit machine that part will follow). It has passed the llvm-test with the -tailcallopt flag enabled. (after half a day on an old g4/800 :) okay to submit? probably not. :) suggestions. regards arnold -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:

Hi For .LL like: define void @Func() { %var1 = alloca double store double 0x40bb580000000000, double* %var1 ret void } ppc32 output is: ... lis 3, 16571 ori 3, 3, 22528 li 4, 0 stw 3, 8(1) stw 4, 12(1) ... I'm using the PPC backend's output as the "bytecode" for an interpreter that I would like to be able to run

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Scott Graham <scott.llvm at h4ck3r.net> wrote: > I'm using the PPC backend's output as the "bytecode" for an interpreter > that I would like to be able to run on both little- and big-endian > platforms. The split stw's mean that i32s of the f64 are swapped in > memory on little-endian (thus foiling native-code interop).

On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:30:29PM +0100, acrux_it at libero.it wrote: > +// Generated files will use "namespace PPC". To avoid symbol clash, > +// undefine PPC here. PPC may be predefined on some hosts. > +#undef PPC > + I wonder if it shouldn't just be renamed to PowerPC everywhere. It's not that much longer. Joerg

On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 06:59:47AM -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 13:28 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:30:29PM +0100, acrux_it at libero.it wrote: > > > +// Generated files will use "namespace PPC". To avoid symbol clash, > > > +// undefine PPC here. PPC may be predefined on some hosts. > > > +#undef

Does anyone have CentOS 4 running on an iMac? Any caveats or useful tips? Where are the ISOs located these days? TIA, Barry

A while back, there was mention that the release of CentOS 4.3 would bring a ppc32 version. Is this still in the works? If so, is it scheduled to be released at the same time as the more popular releases, or at a later time? Thanks, Barry

Can anyone tell me how the ppc32 version of CentOS-4 is coming along? Thanks, Barry

Does anyone have any news about the PPC32 release of CentOS 4? Thanks, Barry