similar to: chromium-el6

Johnny, Any ETA on version 39.0.2171.95 cheers On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 11/14/2014 10:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 11/12/2014 03:09 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > >> I concur. Enter key, ^M, etc. has no effect in the browser. Same for > number > >> keys. > > > > This is a known issue, I

New compilation of chromium (35.0.1916-153). It is a gtk2-build & works with official flash-plugin for el6. First install chromium-deps, adobe-release and finally chromium. (Build with gtk2-2.20.1-5, ninja-build, devtoolset-2) ------------------------------------------------------------ chromium-35.0.1916.153-1.el6.i686.rpm

New version of chromium (34.0.1847.132) chromium-34.0.1847.132-1.el6.i686.rpm <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSR0pRLXU1Q1JQTmc/edit?usp=sharing> Source: chromium-34.0.1847.132-1.el6.src.rpm <https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSd1NWWDM2bHRpU1k/edit> I was *OBLIGED* to patch gtk2-2.20.1 in order to build it: gtk2-2.20.1-5.el6.i686.rpm

New EL6 compilation of chromium (34.0.1847.132) (aura) Based on russian fedora build Build with devtools-2 (http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools-2/readme) chromium-34.0.1847.132-4.el6.i686.rpm https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSM1ByMUNMaWNVYmM/edit?usp=sharing chromium-34.0.1847.132-4.el6.src.rpm https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSNk05U0tlYU1DR1k/edit?usp=sharing It

https://plus.google.com/u/0/100132233764003563318/posts/Y1s6T44Soby Not 100% this is true but the problem apparently is that rhel6 uses an old version of gtk2. If this is true, then it affects my school and my students. I like google-chrome and it works very well with google services. I was planning on using C6 for a long time. Does anyone know of a repo that intends to keep Chromium working

*New version of chromium (33.0.1750.152)*Build by me :-)i686 chromium-33.0.1750.152-3.el6.i686.rpm <https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSWmFiT0REeG1QS28/> SRPM chromium-33.0.1750.152-3.el6.src.rpm <https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSQlZ1OUljT3p6U1U/> -- View this message in context:

All, As has already been brought up, we have not yet been able to build the new version of Chromium-32 for CentOS, and the current version (31.0.1650.63-1.el6) needs updating. We have also recently been informed that we may not redistribute the PepperFlash Library from the Google site (libpepflashplayer.so) as we did in 31.0.1650.63-1.el6. Therefore, I have had to rebuild the currently released

On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/19/2015 06:49 PM, Fred Smith wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps,

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Johnny,

On 21/01/15 21:12, Connie Sieh wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 01/19/2015 06:49 PM, Fred Smith wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 08:01:02PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/19/2015 06:49 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On

Latest chromium-el6 at http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/x86_64/RPMS/ is chromium-28.0.1500.95-213514.x86_64.rpm but latest chromium stable is 29.0.1547.xx wondering if there are any problems building version 29?

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > > > >> On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> > >> wrote:

On 01/19/2015 06:49 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM,

On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > >> On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Johnny, > > > > Any ETA on version 39.0.2171.95 > > > > cheers > > > > > > bump > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list

Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu>: > Any new information here? maybe some cooperation with the fedora community would help to share the effort. Tom Callaway (aka spot) is the maintainer of fedoras repo http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/spot/chromium/ https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/spot/chromium/ thought ... --

Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com>: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > wrote: > >> Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu >>> : >>> Any new information here? >> >> maybe some cooperation with the fedora

------------ Original Message ------------ > Date: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 23:33:39 +0300 > From: Moty Fux <moty.fux at gmail.com> > > Hi, > > Did anyone manage to install chromium on CentOS 7? > I tried and got this error: > > Error: Package: chromium-31.0.1650.63-2.el6.x86_64 (chromium-el6) > Requires: libudev.so.0()(64bit) > > Tried to

Hi, Did anyone manage to install chromium on CentOS 7? I tried and got this error: Error: Package: chromium-31.0.1650.63-2.el6.x86_64 (chromium-el6) Requires: libudev.so.0()(64bit) Tried to do several things among them is creating a sym link from libudev.so.1 to libudev.so.0, didn't work :( Any suggestions? 10x.