Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "Latest chromium i686 - Illegal Instruction"
2014 Feb 15
4
Chromium 31.0.1650.63-2.el6 for CentOS 6
All,
As has already been brought up, we have not yet been able to build the
new version of Chromium-32 for CentOS, and the current version
(31.0.1650.63-1.el6) needs updating.
We have also recently been informed that we may not redistribute the
PepperFlash Library from the Google site (libpepflashplayer.so) as we
did in 31.0.1650.63-1.el6.
Therefore, I have had to rebuild the currently released
2011 Feb 23
12
Alternative to cPanel
Hello all,
I'm looking to setup a new CentOS box for a buddy of mine who
wants to do hosting on a server via CoLo, Years ago I whipped up a CP of my
own on a Debian box he colo'd running a basterdized qmail/tinydns and custom
built httpd/mysql/etc (I was young). It worked ok but time to move on and I
don't have time to maintain all those packages. I also don't have
time to write
2013 Sep 18
3
Chromium update
Latest chromium-el6 at
http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/x86_64/RPMS/
is
chromium-28.0.1500.95-213514.x86_64.rpm
but latest chromium stable is 29.0.1547.xx
wondering if there are any problems building version 29?
2011 Nov 15
3
getenv() in plugin not working
Hi - new to the list, can't find much on this using google.
I'm trying to setup the dovecot DRAC plugin as described here:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/PopBSMTPAndDovecot#DRAC
DRAC is installed and running using this startup command:
/usr/local/sbin/rpc.dracd -i -e 5 /etc/postfix/dracd.db
I downloaded the drac.c file linked on the above URL: http://www.dovecot.org/patches/1.1/drac.c
2010 Jun 17
4
[PATCH] Improve support for exporting btrfs subvolumes.
If you export two subvolumes of a btrfs filesystem, they will both be
given the same uuid so lookups will be confused.
blkid cannot differentiate the two, so we must use the fsid from
statfs64 to identify the filesystem.
We cannot tell if blkid or statfs is best without knowing internal
details of the filesystem in question, so we need to encode specific
knowledge of btrfs in mountd. This is
2005 Dec 17
2
[patch] fix defintion of struct statfs64
From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
Fix the definition of struct statfs64,
required for run-init to work on alpha.
verified to have no regressions on amd64.
Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <janitor@sternwelten.at>
Signed-off-by: Frederik Sch?ler <fschueler-guest@costa.debian.org>
--- klibc-1.1.1.orig/include/sys/vfs.h
+++ klibc-1.1.1/include/sys/vfs.h
@@ -32,17 +32,17
2004 Jun 07
1
klibc-0.124 released with 64-bit off_t and struct statfs64
It's checked in, it seems to work, it didn't bloat the system
significantly, but it makes life a lot easier...
I just released klibc-0.124 with the 64-bit off_t and statfs64 changes.
The API shouldn't have changed, but the ABI is now 64 bits in
(hopefully) all the right places.
It's probably buggy... beat me up or (better) send a patch...
-hpa
2006 Feb 19
2
[patch] statfs64 sparc64 fix
From: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd@spring.luon.net>
It seems that klibc uses __sparc64__ to determine if it's compiled in 64
bit mode on sparc, unfortunatly gcc doesn't define __sparc64__ :) It does
define __arch64__ though.
Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <maks@sternwelten.at>
--- klibc-1.2.2.orig/include/sys/vfs.h 2006-02-15 18:32:10.000000000 +0100
+++
2006 Apr 04
0
[patch] statfs64 sparc_v9 fix
It seems that klibc uses __sparc64__ to determine if it's compiled in 64
bit mode on sparc, gcc doesn't define __sparc64__
use __sparc_v9__ instead as proposed by Kyle McMartin <kyle@parisc-linux.org>,
based on a patch by Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd@spring.luon.net>
Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <maks@sternwelten.at>
---
resend
--- klibc-1.2.2.orig/include/sys/vfs.h
2015 Apr 23
0
Samba 4 slow write
Hello Ervin,
The in-memory cache lookup could be added back into
samba-4.1.6 by applying the attached patch,
if it could be compiled with Louis how-to steps,
perhaps got the chance to make U14.04 be stayed on samba-4.
Here is my test,
the test-bench is uploading 5000 files and each one is 1MB.
The attached patch could improve 15% at case B).
Case A) Original samba-4.1.6
will go through
2015 Apr 23
2
Samba 4 slow write
Hi Jones,
many thanks again four your help and your time.
Thanks for the patch too - I'll check it up.
On my Ubuntu, there is a Samba 4.1.6. I'll install the samba
source package, and will try to apply the patch, then - I hope -
the package will be compiled as well.
I'll notify to you about the result. (First, I need to upgrade
that server.)
Thanks again,
Ervin
On Thu, Apr
2016 Apr 18
2
Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
On 04/18/2016 09:06 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Karanbir Singh <kbsingh at centos.org> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 18/04/16 14:15, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
>>> Thanks. I imagine (hope?) there shouldn't be too much effort to get
>>> this to work, since it's
2016 Apr 18
0
Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Karanbir Singh <kbsingh at centos.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 18/04/16 14:15, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> > Thanks. I imagine (hope?) there shouldn't be too much effort to get
> > this to work, since it's already been done upstream. RedHat
> > continues to push out updates even. E.g.
2016 Apr 19
0
Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote:
> On 04/18/2016 09:06 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Karanbir Singh <kbsingh at centos.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> On 18/04/16 14:15, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
>
2013 Oct 09
0
[PATCH 1/1] Porting klibc to AArch64
Details of the changes in second patch set as outlined in the first mail of
this series:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/usr/include/arch/aarch64/klibc/archconfig.h
b/usr/include/arch/aarch64/klibc/archconfig.h
index 5cc1e7e..5ee278d 100644
--- a/usr/include/arch/aarch64/klibc/archconfig.h
+++
2004 Jun 07
0
Massive code drop
I have released a patch for klibc which changes off_t to 64 bits, and
hopefully deals with most of the rest of the fallout. We shouldn't be
using any obsolescent types anymore, except for struct statfs (I intend
to hack that next so we use statfs64() and fstatfs64()). We're still
using some older system calls, like sigaction() instead of
rt_sigaction() where available, but
2010 Jun 02
2
NFS exporting btrfs subvolumes.
NFS needs a unique identifier for a filesystem to be able to export it.
This can be set by the admin (fsid= in /etc/exports) but that is a hassle
and it is best to set it automatically.
nfs-utils currently uses the UUID returned by libblkid if that works,
or the fsid returned by statfs64 if libblkid finds nothings and
fsid is non-zero. Otherwise it uses device major/minor.
This
2018 Jul 02
0
Samba 4.3.11 accessing disk every minute
The latest version that Western Digital has shipped with the My cloud devices accesses the disk
about twice a minute. The access to /dev/sda2 is causing the system to keep the disk from going
into standby mode. I don't understand the call to quotactl every minute when no one is trying to access the share.
An strace of one of the processes shows the following:
poll([{fd=13,
2015 Apr 22
3
Samba 4 slow write
Hi Louis,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 01:15:21PM +0200, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
> Or..
> get the sources and recompile agains 14.04
>
> use the following commands.
> enable the deb-src in /etc/apt/sources.list
> and run :
>
> apt-get build-dep sernet-samba
> apt-get source sernet-samba -b
>
> you wil end up with .deb files ;-)
yep, thanks - I'll check it
2011 Apr 06
2
[OT: threading] WAS: Centos 6 Update?
> > >> firstly, get a better email client. Your existing one is broken.
> > > Irrelevant, unhelpful and quite rude.
> >
> > mailing lists are setup to retain thread sanity, its expected people
> > use mailclients that can honour that. If yours cant and you prefer not
> > to change it- perhaps consider using the centos.org forums instead ?
>
>