similar to: packages with Sweave and knitr vignettes?

Hi, as far as I understand it, the new R devel feature of processing non-Sweave vignettes will (a) locate any "[.][RrSs](nw|tex)$" or ".Rmd" files, (b) check for a registered vignette engine, (c) process the file using the registered "weave" function, (d) and possibly post process the generated weave artifact (e.g. a *.tex file). I'd like to propose to extend

I haven't figured it out entirely, but it looks like there are a couple of small glitches with knitr-based vignettes and SweaveParseOptions. I posted the tarball of a package with a knitr vignette with (as far as I can tell) everything properly coded in the DESCRIPTION file (VignetteBuilder: knitr, Suggests: knitr) and the vignette itself (%\VignetteEngine{knitr::knitr}). When Windows

I?m preparing a package (fastR) for submission to CRAN, but the vignette index keeps going AWOL, or at least R CMD check ?as-cran thinks so. I?ve tried several things and gave myself the weekend to think of other things, but I can?t figure it out. Perhaps someone on the list can lend a hand. Here?s one example situation, where I build the index.html file myself and put it in inst/doc/index.html

In Section 1.4.2 of "Writing R Extensions" %\VignetteEngine{knitr::knitr} should be %\VignetteEngine{knitr::knit} > sessionInfo() R version 3.0.2 (2013-09-25) Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0 (64-bit) Is this sort of thing best reported here, or is a huge report in order? John Maindonald email: john.maindonald at anu.edu.au phone : +61 2 (6125)3473 fax

A package uses VignetteEngine: knitr; the package itself does not Suggests: knitr, but it Suggests: BiocStyle which in turn Suggests: knitr. Nonetheless, R CMD check fails indicating that a package required for checking is not declared. Is it really the intention that the original package duplicate Suggests: knitr? This is only with a recent R. In detail, with $ Rdev --version|head -3 R Under

Dear all, I'm trying to use a Markdown vignette with UTF-8 encoding. It compiles well when knitting the vignette in RStudio, but it fails to recognize the UTF-8 settings when building the source package. Can someone point out what I'm doing wrong? I tried to put the relevant information below. Best regards, Thierry Details: Using 64-bit R 3.1.2 with encoding = "native.enc"

Dear Duncan, The UTF-8 characters aren't properly rendered in the pdf version of the vignette. $?? ????? ?????? ?????? ????? ?? ?? is rendered as $????? ?????????? ???????????? ????? ?????? ? ???????? ???????? The same problem occurs when I use render("vignette.md", output_format = "mypackage::mystyle"), instead of render("vignette.md", output_format =

A few things to clarify: 1. You do not necessarily have to keep the \usepackage{} line if you use %\VignetteEncoding{UTF-8}, because Pandoc will use UTF-8 anyway in its LaTeX template. 2. Perhaps the vignette engine in R has done something clever to convert utf8 to UTF-8, but I'd recommend %\VignetteEncoding{UTF-8} instead of %\VignetteEncoding{utf8} to make sure it is a valid encoding name,

As a user, I am always annoyed beyond measure that Sweave vignettes precede the code by a command line prompt. It makes running examples by simple copying of the commands from the vignette to the console a pain. I know the idea is that it is clear what is the command, and what is the output, but I'd rather precede the output with some kind of marking. Is there any other solution possible /

Trying to Stangle / Sweave a file $ cat vignette.Rnw %\VignetteEngine{knitr} \documentclass{article} \begin{document} \end{document} results in a misleading error message: ~/tmp$ R CMD Stangle vignette.Rnw Error: Vignette engine package not specified Execution halted when what is missing is the full specification knitr::knitr; 'vignette engine package and function not specified' ?

I need some help understanding a problem running the tests on the 'digest' package. Initially, I got the message that the 'knitr' package was needed to run vignettes: Running vignettes for package ?digest? Error in loadVignetteBuilder(vigns$pkgdir) : vignette builder 'knitr' not found So I installed the knitr package and all its dependents (?mime?, ?stringi?,

Hi, I notice in R-3.1.1, if a package specifies a VignetteBuilder (such as knitr) in its DESCRIPTION file, but does not also depend on the specified package (in either Depends, Imports, or Suggests), that R CMD check will say: * checking package dependencies ... ERROR VignetteBuilder package not declared: ?knitr? I'm glad this situation is now caught by R CMD check, but I think the message

Hi, Recently I saw a couple of cases in which the package vignettes were somewhat complicated so that Stangle() (or knitr::purl() or other tangling functions) can fail to produce the exact R code that is executed by the weaving function Sweave() (or knitr::knit(), ...). For example, this is a valid document that can pass the weaving process but cannot generate a valid R script to be source()d:

Dear R-devs, Scenario: When checking a package via `R CMD check package_tar.ball`, required / suggested packages may be missing. R subsequently returns a list of packages that are missing (delimited by spaces). Example: ``` R CMD check glmSparseNet_0.99.13.tar.gz * using log directory '/home/ubuntu/Bioconductor/glmSparseNet.Rcheck' * using R Under development (unstable) (2018-06-06

On 19/02/2018 5:47 AM, Michael Hannon wrote: > Thanks, Duncan. The files in question are Emacs Org-mode files, and I > think these are more or less isomorphic to Rmd files, but I haven't > used Org-mode in a long time, so I think the mapping (Org-mode ==> > Rmd) would be painful. If they aren't LaTeX then they won't be able to masquerade as Sweave files, so things are

> On 19 Feb 2018, at 12:25, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com <mailto:murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 19/02/2018 5:47 AM, Michael Hannon wrote: >> Thanks, Duncan. The files in question are Emacs Org-mode files, and I >> think these are more or less isomorphic to Rmd files, but I haven't >> used Org-mode in a long time, so I think

On 09/07/2018 3:24 PM, Witold E Wolski wrote: > Dear Yihui, > > Thank you for the valuable questions. > > sample_analysis is a "tibble" while > configuration is an "R6" class. > But I also have parametrized reports where I pass R reference classes > as arguments. > > This is the Rmd yaml params part corresponding to the error message. > >

On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 at 19:12, Roger Bivand <Roger.Bivand at nhh.no> wrote: > > My point exactly. It should only run R RHOME to check for the existence of > R (if this is what it does) at run time, not at install time. If it then, > at run time, does not find R, or having found R does not find knitr > (though Sweave is part of utils, so knitr is only needed by those using >

Yes, 'C-c C-e l l' I think, but follow the pop-up, and everything should be ok. On Feb 19, 2018 07:05, "Rainer Krug" <rainer_krug at icloud.com> wrote: > > > > On 19 Feb 2018, at 12:25, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com > <mailto:murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > On 19/02/2018 5:47 AM, Michael Hannon wrote: >

Thanks, Duncan. The files in question are Emacs Org-mode files, and I think these are more or less isomorphic to Rmd files, but I haven't used Org-mode in a long time, so I think the mapping (Org-mode ==> Rmd) would be painful. -- Mike On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 1:20 AM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > On 18/02/2018 9:06 PM, Michael Hannon wrote: >>