similar to: System Hang on busy NFS server

We improved our instruction itineraries and now we're seeing our testcases for fence instructions break. For example, we have this testcase: @write_me = external global i32 @read_me = external global i32 ; Function Attrs: nounwind define i32 @xstg_intrinsic(i32 %foo) #0 { entry: ; CHECK: store r0, r1, 0, 32 ; CHECK-NEXT: fence 2 %foo.addr = alloca i32, align 4 store i32 %foo,

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Aug 22, 2016, at 11:20, Phil Tomson via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > We improved our instruction itineraries and now we're seeing our > testcases for fence instructions break. > > > > For example, we have this testcase: > >

Hi All, I have a very strange problem that I'm unable to pinpoint at the moment. For some reason I am simply unable to get xfs_quotas to report correctly on a freshly installed, fully patched CentOS 6 box. I have specified all the same options as on another machine which *is* reporting quota LABEL=TEST /exports/TEST xfs inode64,nobarrier,delaylog,usrquota,grpquota 0 0 xfs_quota -xc

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org > wrote: > On 1/7/2016 3:25 PM, Phil Tomson wrote: > >> >> That's better, but now I get: >> >> XSTGInstrInfo.td:902:3: error: In RelAddr: XSTGRELADDR node requires >> exactly 2 operands! >> >> Which makes some sense as XSTGRELADDR is defined as: >> def

We are looking at building a storage platform based on Dell HW + ZFS (likely Nexenta). Going Dell because they can provide solid HW support globally. Are any of you using the MD1200 JBOD with head units *without* an MD3200 in front? We are being told that the MD1200''s won''t "daisy chain" unless the MD3200 is involved. We would be looking to use some sort of

Anyone have any experience with a R510 with the PERC H200/H700 controller with ZFS? My perception is that Dell doesn''t play well with OpenSolaris. Thanks, Geoff

And someone goes and redesigns the look and operation of the Trac. Quite noice, but a couple of comments: * The main toolbar ("Wiki", "Documentation", "Timeline") ends up under the puppet logo on the left hand side, which is a pest. * I can''t click on any link, text box, or button in the main part of the page. All of the navigation links work fine, and I

Hi folks: At work, I have an R510, and R610 and an R710 - all with the H700 PERC controller. Based on experiments, it seems like there is no way to bypass the PERC controller - it seems like one can only access the individual disks if they are set up in RAID0 each. This brings me to ask some questions: a. Is it fine (in terms of an intelligent controller coming in the way of ZFS) to have the

Hi All, I'm looking for input as to how I may restrict some post commit hooks by way of SELinux or some other mechanism. Here's a description of the problem that I need to solve. I have a source code server that support SVN and soon git. The server has no actual users on it and we use CAS with Apache basic authentication to authenticate and authorize users access to the repository.

Hello all, I have 2 identical Dell r510 servers with 10gig card, running centos 6 with samba-3.5.4-68.el6_0.2.x86_64. I setup 16G ramdisk samba share on both and ran cp from local ramdisk to samba ramdisk mount. If I cp 12 1-gig files, I get combined 100MB/s transfer rate. Single file cp maxes out at about 15MB/s. Ftp transfer give me over 300MB/s. Running with 9000 MTU. Most smb.conf is

Hi all, I've a little problem with CentOS 6 and EFI on Dell Poweredge R510... My Logical disk (hardware raid) is a little bit greated than 9TB, so i must use EFI in order to see the whole disk space and boot on it, but my box don't want to boot on CentOS 6 x86_64 Install DVD when i'm in EFI boot mode. someone has successfully installed CentOS 6 x86_64 in EFI mode ? Regards.

On 11/12/13, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > tell that Noel which is blocking my messages and so did > not read what i quoted from Benny's trolling but opens > his mouth > > tell that Noel which is abusing his power by set complete > IP-ranges on RBL lists he maintains because he does not > like one person using a mailserver on that range besides

Hi, I have speex running as a part of a voice conferencing app. Well, one under development anyway. I'm running VBR at quality 3 and get a "hissy-squelchy" background noise. This is fine, kinda, because the internal microphone in the laptop picks up hiss, the sound of the (actually very quiet) hard drive and generally speaking is of less than exemplary quality. To help

Hi, what would be a good value for /proc/sys/vm/min_free_kbytes on a Dual-CPU EM64T System with 8 GB of memory. Kernel is 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp. I know that the default might be a bit low. Unfortunatelly the documentation is a bit weak in this area. We are experiencing responsiveness problems (and higher than expected load) when the system is under combined memory+network+disk-IO stress.

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 1/7/2016 1:55 PM, Phil Tomson via llvm-dev wrote: > >> >> let Uses= [GRP] in { >> def RelAddr : XSTGPseudo< (outs), >> (ins GPRC:$spoff, GPRC:$dst), >>

I''m developing an app, and I want to make a single boolean field OK to change from 0 to 1, but not allow 1 to 0. Seems like the model''s validate method would be the right place for this, but I''m not sure how to implement it. Any suggestions (actual or pointers to) are greatly appreciated. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Reposting from xen-users (no response) I''m having a problem with: http://pastebin.com/CuGHqwhy It occurs on the reboot, but sometimes, when I try to start manually one of my machines. Sometime, one of the machines does not want to start permanently and I have to reinstall/restore it. This problem comes for me randomly, but maybe there is a trigger. I''ve tried to follow:

Hardware: Dell Poweredge R510 (32G ram, 8 CPU- Xeon) 64bit - xen 4.0.1 stable 64bit - 2.6.32.18 dom0 (.config attached) running Ubuntu 10.04 32 bit - 2.6.18.8 domU (.config attached) running ubuntu 8.04 domU has 3 tap2 disks, on lvm snapshots. domU has 2G mem, 2 VCPU workload on domU - ssh + top running, destroy domain -- This works . But, If i run a heavier workload say postgres db (just

On 07/11/2018 05:21 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 10-07-18 18:44:34, Linus Torvalds wrote: > [...] >> That was what I tried to encourage with actually removing the pages >> form the page list. That would be an _incremental_ interface. You can >> remove MAX_ORDER-1 pages one by one (or a hundred at a time), and mark >> them free for ballooning that way. And if you

On 07/11/2018 05:21 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 10-07-18 18:44:34, Linus Torvalds wrote: > [...] >> That was what I tried to encourage with actually removing the pages >> form the page list. That would be an _incremental_ interface. You can >> remove MAX_ORDER-1 pages one by one (or a hundred at a time), and mark >> them free for ballooning that way. And if you