similar to: Gluster 3.4 Samba VFS writes slow in Win 7 clients

Hi everybody, I have several VMs running on Xenserver 6.5 I have 2 samba servers (1 DC & 1 Fileserver). They are both running Debian Linux 8.2 Jessie. I'm using the samba debian package (4.1.17) My VM has 8G RAM and 4 vCPU How can i test if the performances are quite good or not? with reading/writing Could I have better performance with the latest samba release? thanks Pierre --

I ran into something like this in 3.10.4 and filed two bugs for it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491059 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491060 Please see the above bugs for full detail. In summary, my issue was related to glusterd's pid handling of pid files when is starts self-heal and bricks. The issues are: a. brick pid file leaves stale pid and brick fails

Hi, I have a distributed volume which runs on Fedora 26 systems with glusterfs 3.11.2 from gluster.org repos: ---------- [root at taupo ~]# glusterd --version glusterfs 3.11.2 gluster> volume info gv2 Volume Name: gv2 Type: Distribute Volume ID: 6b468f43-3857-4506-917c-7eaaaef9b6ee Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 6 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1:

Hi All, Kubernetes and Openshift have amazing projects called minikube and minishift which make it very easy to setup those distributed systems for easy development. As the Gluster ecosystem grows, we have more external projects which require easy setup of multi node Gluster cluster. Hence, along those lines, I introduce to you...minister (mini + Glu"ster"). Please do check out the

I've just setup a simple gluster storage system on Centos 5.2 x64 w/ gluster 1.3.10 I have three storage bricks and one client Everytime i run iozone across this setup, i seem to get a bad file descriptor around the 4k mark. Any thoughts why? I'm sure more info is wanted, i'm just not sure what else to include at this point. thanks [root at green gluster]# cat

Glusterfs 3.10.3 has been tagged. Packages for the various distributions will be available in a few days, and with that a more formal release announcement will be made. - Tagged code: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/tree/v3.10.3 - Release notes: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/release-3.10/doc/release-notes/3.10.3.md Thanks, Raghavendra Talur NOTE: Tracker bug for 3.10.3 will be

Awesome! You're on the list. Anyone else want to present? - amye On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Raghavendra Talur <rtalur at redhat.com> wrote: > I propose a talk > > "Life of a gluster client process" > > We will have a look at one complete life cycle of a client process > which includes: > * mount script and parsing of args > * contacting glusterd

Hi gluster users, I've spent several months trying to get any kind of high performance out of gluster. The current XFS/samba array is used for video editing and 300-400MB/s for at least 4 clients is minimum (currently a single windows client gets at least 700/700 for a single client over samba, peaking to 950 at times using blackmagic speed test). Gluster has been getting me as low as

Help please- I am running 3.3.1 on Centos using a 10GB network. I get reasonable write speeds, although I think they could be faster. But my read speeds are REALLY slow. Executive summary: On gluster client- Writes average about 700-800MB/s Reads average about 70-80MB/s On server- Writes average about 1-1.5GB/s Reads average about 2-3GB/s Any thoughts? Here are some additional details:

Hi Talur, I've successfully got Gluster deployed as a DaemonSet using k8s spec file glusterfs-daemonset.json from https://github.com/heketi/heketi/tree/master/extras/kubernetes but then when I try deploying heketi using heketi-deployment.json spec file, I end up with a CrashLoopBackOff pod. # kubectl get pods NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE

It is sequential write with file size 2GB. Same behavior observed with 3.11.3 too. On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/06/2017 05:48 AM, Serkan ?oban wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Just do some ingestion tests to 40 node 16+4EC 19PB single volume. >> 100 clients are writing each has 5 threads total 500 threads.

On 28-Jun-2017 5:49 PM, "mabi" <mabi at protonmail.ch> wrote: Anyone? -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Persistent storage for docker containers from a Gluster volume Local Time: June 25, 2017 6:38 PM UTC Time: June 25, 2017 4:38 PM From: mabi at protonmail.ch To: Gluster Users <gluster-users at gluster.org> Hello, I have a two node replica 3.8 GlusterFS

Hi, we would like to establish a small Lustre instance and for the OST planning to use standard Dell PE1950 servers (2x QuadCore + 16 GB Ram) and for the disk a JBOD (MD1000) steered by the PE1950 internal Raid controller (Raid-6). Any experience (good or bad) with such a config ? thanxs, Martin

Hi all! Based on the popularity of wanting more lightning talks at Gluster Summit, we'll be trying something new: Gluster Developer Conversations. This will be a one hour meeting on November 28th at UTC 15:00, with five 5 minute lightning talks and time for discussion in between. The meeting will be recorded, and I'll be posting the individual talks separately in our community channels.

Having done a current checkout, creating a new FS and running iozone [1] on it results in an oops [2]. remove_suid is called, accessing offset 14 of a NULL pointer. Let me know if you''d like me to test any fix, do further debugging or get more information. Thanks, Daniel --- [1] # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda4 # mount /dev/sda4 /mnt /mnt# iozone -a . --- [2] [ 899.118926] BUG: unable to

Hi all, we got a new test system here and I just also tested btrfs raid6 on that. Write performance is slightly lower than hw-raid (LSI megasas) and md-raid6, but it probably would be much better than any of these two, if it wouldn''t read all the during the writes. Is this a known issue? This is with linux-3.9.2. Thanks, Bernd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Hello: Sorry for asking iozone ques in this mailing list but couldn't find any mailing list on iozone... In IOZone, is there a way to configure # of outstanding requests client sends to server side? Something on the lines of IOMeter option "Number of outstanding requests". Thanks a lot!

Hi Brandon, Can you please turn OFF client-io-threads as we have seen degradation of performance with io-threads ON on sequential read/writes, random read/writes. Server event threads is 1 and client event threads are 2 by default. Thanks & Regards On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Brandon Bates <brandon at brandonbates.com> wrote: > Hi gluster users, > I've spent several

Hi All We are currently testing our product using KVM as the hypervisor. We are not using KVM as a bare-metal hypervisor. We use it on top of a RHEL installation. So basically RHEL acts as our host and using KVM we deploy guests on this system. We have all along tested and shipped our application image for VMware ESXi installations , So this it the first time we are trying our application

Hi, We''re doing some benchmarking at a customer (using IOzone) and for some specific small block random tests, performance of their X4500 is very poor (~1.2 MB/s aggregate throughput for a 5+1 RAIDZ). Specifically, the test is the IOzone multithreaded throughput test of an 8GB file size and 8KB record size, with the server physmem''d to 2GB. I noticed a couple of peculiar