similar to: Bug #866

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866 Summary: ssh(1) is too picky about unknown options in ~/.ssh/config Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.8p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866 --- Comment #19 from Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett.org> --- (In reply to comment #17) > Created attachment 1610 [details] > Patch which allows OpenSSH to ignore unknown options. > > This is a patch which implements alternative 1 from Josh Triplett. This > patch makes ssh ignore all unknown options which are prefixed

These problem aren't bugs per se but rather major version differences. Sun has finally published a FAQ on their SSH two days ago http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=finfodoc%2F50465&zone_32 =sshd The problem is rooted in the fact that Sun developed their SSH based on OpenSSH 2.5.1p1 That version came out in February of 2001. There have been a number of changes since then and

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1529 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

hi all, we had quite a few requests recently so that SunSSH allowed to hush a banner on client side when in command-mode only. The argument usually is that the banner is mandatory due to legal reasons so first time login users should see it but that it causes problems when ssh is used from scripts after that. '-q' often seems not an option. RFC 4252 permits hushing banner in section

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362 Summary: Loss of change password functionality Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: UltraSparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=813 ------- Additional Comments From alex at milivojevic.org 2005-04-07 04:50 ------- I was doing some testing, and the strange thing is that SunSSH server gives wrong exit status only when using newer versions of openssh on the client side. For example, Red Hat 7.3 as client (openssh 3.1) is OK Fedora Core / RHEL4 as client (openssh 3.9) gives

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866 --- Comment #17 from Olav Morken <olavmrk at gmail.com> 2009-03-09 06:21:16 --- Created an attachment (id=1610) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1610) Patch which allows OpenSSH to ignore unknown options. This is a patch which implements alternative 1 from Josh Triplett. This patch makes ssh ignore all unknown

Dear friends, I've published my 3rd book! "The Complete April Fools RFCs" by Thomas A. Limoncelli and Peter J. Salus http://www.rfc-humor.com This is a compilation of the best April Fools jokes created by the IETF, the group that creates the standards for how the Internet works. It's pretty technical but fun to read for anyone that is in software development, system

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=921 Summary: Add operating system to OpenSSH version string Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org

On Wed, April 12, 2017 8:07 am, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 04/12/2017 05:59 AM, Leroy Tennison wrote: >> <humor for the day>Why don't we discuss something ***less*** >> controversial, like politics or religion?</humor for the day> >> > > Even when I'm the one complaining (and I don't about systemd), I'm > always reminded of some TV clip I saw

On 04/12/2017 05:59 AM, Leroy Tennison wrote: > <humor for the day>Why don't we discuss something ***less*** controversial, like politics or religion?</humor for the day> > Even when I'm the one complaining (and I don't about systemd), I'm always reminded of some TV clip I saw when I was young and can't place of a bunch of old people complaining :

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Wed, April 12, 2017 8:07 am, Alice Wonder wrote: >> On 04/12/2017 05:59 AM, Leroy Tennison wrote: >>> <humor for the day>Why don't we discuss something ***less*** >>> controversial, like politics or religion?</humor for the day> >> >> Even when I'm the one complaining (and I don't about systemd), I'm

Hi all, I was a client site today on another project and we started talking about RoR. I wanted to show it in action, so I downloaded the one-click Ruby installer for Windows and then tried to do "gem install Rails -include-dependencies". After a time-out period I received the following error: ERROR: While executing gem.(Gem::RemoteSourceException) Error fetching remote gem

I''m having a problem switching from cookie sessions (the default) to active record sessions. I''ve created the sessions table via the rake task, uncommented the line config.action_controller.session_store = :active_record_store in my environment.rb file, cleared out my browsers cookies, restarted the server (natch), but still the it''s using cookie_store instead of

Hi, I'm not sure how interested anybody here is in this, but I've been working lately on getting rid of the horror that is SunSSH for some distros of Illumos (mostly SmartOS). One of the patches we're carrying around at the moment is one that simply drops fine-grained privileges in sshd, ssh-agent and sftp-server. Since the privilege dropping here is roughly equivalent to a more

me at tdiehl.org wrote: > On Fri, 25 Aug 2017, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: >> >> I usually receive updates after the related announcement has hit my >> inbox. But today I see a thunderbird update, but no message on >> centos-announce yet, not even in the archives. > > Just a guess but Johnny Hughes usually does those announcements. There is > a large Hurricane

Hi, I''ve just quietly opened http://www.extranormal.com/ to the public. There''s been some interest regarding this in the IRC channel on previous occasions, so I thought i''d mention it here. It''s a social networking/dating site, built with Rails (natch). Forums, profiles, image galleries, private messages, groups, private groups with forums and

Hello all. Am I going totally nuts here and just want to check (Natch!) something. A normal check_box has two value posssibilities. One for checked and one for unchecked, the value gets submitted with a form. The check_box_tag on the other hand, has a checked_value (Called just ''value'') and for the unchecked value...nothing, zip, nada. This means that if you submit a form with

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2004-08-29