similar to: AD DC eventually not browsable without restart

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "AD DC eventually not browsable without restart"

2013 Aug 16
2
share permissions
I have a share setup on a Samba 4.0.8 / CentOS 6.4 box that is successfully replicating with a W2K3 server. I'm following the HOWTO here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_and_configure_file_shares [mytest] path = /home/me/mytestshare <-- with or without trailing slash read only = No On the W2K3 box, I can browse to \\newdc and I see my test share listed there. I can also see
2013 Aug 20
1
chmod + remote save denied = file wiped?
I have a SerNet Samba 4.0.8 AD DC running on CentOS 6.4 (newdc) replicating from a W2K3 DC (olddc). newdc also has a test share. I'm experiencing something strange whereby chmod and then an attempted file save causes a shared file to become zero bytes (despite the save not being blank, and also being denied): At olddc: 1) open \\newdc\testshare\yay.txt At newdc: $ ls -l total 8
2013 Aug 23
0
CUPS working but errors from Windows clients accessing printer
Hi, On CentOS 6.4 (newdc), I have CUPS 1.4.2-50.el6_4.5 installed, can access its web interface. There I set up our main shared printer, an OCE Imagistics cm2520, and successfully printed a test page. With SerNet Samba 4.0.9 on the same box configured every which example way I could find, I cannot seem to get it to the point where double-clicking the printer in Windows (W2K3, OLDDC) opens
2013 Sep 22
0
gpresult returns "ERROR: The RPC server is unavailable."
Hi, I have a CentOS 6.4 box running SerNet Samba 4.0.9 as an AD DC replicating from a W2k3 box. If I run "gpresult /s OLDDC /user MYDOM\Me" on a command prompt on OLDDC, I get a normal output, listing which GPOs are applied. If I run "gpresult /s NEWDC /user MYDOM\Me" in the same place, I get "ERROR: The RPC server is unavailable." This is after a fresh restart
2017 Aug 26
2
DC Upgrade from 4.1.7 to 4.6.7
> -----Message d'origine----- > De : samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] De la part de Rowland > Penny via samba > Envoyé : lundi 21 août 2017 16:34 > À : samba at lists.samba.org > Objet : Re: [Samba] DC Upgrade from 4.1.7 to 4.6.7 > > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:52:01 +0400 > HB via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hello all,
2017 Jan 27
0
samba 4.4
I'm trying to upgrade our old DC's from samba 4.2 to samba 4.4. Rather than upgrade in-place, I am creating new DCs and then joining them. This generally seems to work as expected, except outbound replication seems to fail. [root at newDC samba-4.4.4]# samba-tool drs replicate newDC oldDC CN=Configuration,DC=ad,DC=mydomain,DC=com -U Administrator Replicate from oldDC to newDC was
2019 Apr 17
2
Is possible use BIND9 as DNS Back End on a new Samba DC?
Rowland, My configure line is ./configure --enable-debug --enable-selftest --with-systemd. A hour ago, I ignored the inconsistency that I reported in the first e-mail of this topic and I proceeded as described at topic "Joining a Samba DC to an Existing Active Directory" and I joined new DC with command: samba-tool domain join mydomain.com DC -U"MYDOMAIN\administrator"
2017 Aug 21
4
DC Upgrade from 4.1.7 to 4.6.7
Hello all, Our Samba AD DC is running perfectly for years with the following basic setup (see smb.conf below) : - one DC running Samba 4.1.7 / CentOS 6.5 (compiled from sources) - internal DNS - this DC is also a Print Server - about 400 PC workstations (mainly win7 Pro / win10 Pro and some XP Pro), and about 300 users - several Synology NAS file servers
2013 Aug 15
2
Samba4 and iptables
Hi everyone, I had posted recently about getting Samba4 to work on CentOS 6.4 but having changes only replicating in one direction, from the Win2k3 AD but not back to it. I solved the problem, this time, by disabling iptables. I find it a bit hard to understand. These are the rules I have set up: *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [52:5888] -A INPUT -m state
2017 Aug 26
0
DC Upgrade from 4.1.7 to 4.6.7
On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 11:28:00 +0400 HB via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] De la part de > > Rowland Penny via samba > > Envoyé : lundi 21 août 2017 16:34 > > À : samba at lists.samba.org > > Objet : Re: [Samba] DC Upgrade from 4.1.7 to 4.6.7 > >
2017 Aug 26
2
DC Upgrade from 4.1.7 to 4.6.7
> -----Message d'origine----- > De : samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] De la part de Rowland > Penny via samba > Envoyé : samedi 26 août 2017 12:00 > À : samba at lists.samba.org > Objet : Re: [Samba] DC Upgrade from 4.1.7 to 4.6.7 > ... > On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 11:28:00 +0400 > > Hi, > > > > I have begun to add a new 4.6.7 DC (following
2013 Sep 06
0
Samba 4 "TKEY is unacceptable" driving me NUTS!
I've installed Samba 4.09 on ubuntu with bind 9.8.1-P1, the former compiled from git source and the latter installed from apt-get. I'm migrating from an existing Windows 2008 SBS domain controller that I want to retire (and be Windows free on the server side), and have followed the instructions on the Samba wiki for setting up Bind and migrating. When I run a samba_dnsupate -verbose
2023 Feb 13
1
access "claim types"
On 13/02/2023 13:04, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > I am a bit confused right now (maybe always): you told me "Administrator > shouldn't own anything on Unix" From the Unix end, you should never find Administrator owning anything. This is because, as my example showed. as a Unix use, Administrator is just a normal, unprivileged user e.g. my example Unix
2023 Feb 13
1
access "claim types"
Am 13.02.23 um 12:14 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> # ls -n >> insgesamt 24 >> drwxrwxr-x+ 4 0 10512 4096? 9. Dez 20:43 Test1 >> drwxrwxr-x+ 2 0 10512 4096? 9. Dez 20:41 test2 >> drwxrwxr-x+ 2 0 10512 4096? 9. Dez 20:41 test3 >> >> gid 10512 should be "domain admins" or in this case german >> "dom?nen-admins" with an ugly
2014 May 22
1
Problem with SAMBA 4 on Debian default installation
Dear All, I have samba 4 installation which was upgraded from samba 3. Everything was working fine for about 6 months. Then I don't remember what I have done but after restart of server, it is impossible to log into Windows using Workgroup. The setup consists of several Windows XP and Windows 7 computer. Samba jest PDC. Looks like problems with configuration of Kerberos or around it.
2019 Apr 17
2
Is possible use BIND9 as DNS Back End on a new Samba DC?
Rowland, I've done almost all permissions change, I forgot bind-dns directory. Now, the named service still doesn't start and journalctl -xe showed me that this occurs because permission denied to run dlz_bind9_9.so. I've checked out and the lib and directory /usr/local/samba/lib/bind9/ have execute permission to named group. The output of ls command, journalctl -xe and
2015 May 08
2
samba 4.2.1 RDP && restrict anonymous = 2 problem
RDP working configuration: restrict anonymous = 0 auth methods = sam winbind server services = winbindd, s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, cldap, ldap, kdc, drepl, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate dcerpc endpoint servers = epmapper, wkssvc, rpcecho, samr, netlogon, lsarpc, spoolss, drsuapi, dssetup, unixinfo, browser, eventlog6, backupkey, dnsserver, remote, winreg, srvsvc RDP
2015 Apr 24
5
Strange GPO rights samba 4.2.1
Hai, ? Im having a strange thing with sernet samba 4.2.1 on debian wheezy. ? I installed 2 dc.s with my scripts. ? i did setup the sysvol replication and now im seeing the following when i create new policies. ? The default GPO's drwxrwx---+ 4 root????????? BUILTIN\administrators 4096 Apr 24 10:17 {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} drwxrwx---+ 4 root????????? BUILTIN\administrators
2015 Apr 13
3
samba 4.2 RDP problem
Hi Heinz, Baris wrote me the following: > i'm using samba4 and RDP running.... > my configuration: > > smb.conf > > .. > auth methods = sam, winbind, ntdomain, ntdomain:winbind > server services = s3fs, winbind, rpc, nbt, wrepl, cldap, ldap, kdc, drepl, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate > dcerpc endpoint servers = epmapper, wkssvc, rpcecho, samr, netlogon,
2015 May 08
1
samba 4.2.1 RDP && restrict anonymous = 2 problem
On 08/05/15 19:36, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 08/05/15 18:51, bar?? tombul wrote: >> RDP working configuration: >> >> restrict anonymous = 0 >> auth methods = sam winbind >> server services = winbindd, s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, cldap, ldap, >> kdc, drepl, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate >> dcerpc endpoint servers =