Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "AD DC eventually not browsable without restart"
2013 Aug 16
2
share permissions
I have a share setup on a Samba 4.0.8 / CentOS 6.4 box that is
successfully replicating with a W2K3 server. I'm following the HOWTO
here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_and_configure_file_shares
[mytest]
path = /home/me/mytestshare <-- with or without trailing slash
read only = No
On the W2K3 box, I can browse to \\newdc and I see my test share listed
there. I can also see
2013 Aug 20
1
chmod + remote save denied = file wiped?
I have a SerNet Samba 4.0.8 AD DC running on CentOS 6.4 (newdc)
replicating from a W2K3 DC (olddc). newdc also has a test share.
I'm experiencing something strange whereby chmod and then an attempted
file save causes a shared file to become zero bytes (despite the save
not being blank, and also being denied):
At olddc:
1) open \\newdc\testshare\yay.txt
At newdc:
$ ls -l
total 8
2013 Aug 23
0
CUPS working but errors from Windows clients accessing printer
Hi,
On CentOS 6.4 (newdc), I have CUPS 1.4.2-50.el6_4.5 installed, can
access its web interface. There I set up our main shared printer, an
OCE Imagistics cm2520, and successfully printed a test page.
With SerNet Samba 4.0.9 on the same box configured every which example
way I could find, I cannot seem to get it to the point where
double-clicking the printer in Windows (W2K3, OLDDC) opens
2013 Sep 22
0
gpresult returns "ERROR: The RPC server is unavailable."
Hi,
I have a CentOS 6.4 box running SerNet Samba 4.0.9 as an AD DC
replicating from a W2k3 box.
If I run "gpresult /s OLDDC /user MYDOM\Me" on a command prompt on
OLDDC, I get a normal output, listing which GPOs are applied.
If I run "gpresult /s NEWDC /user MYDOM\Me" in the same place, I get
"ERROR: The RPC server is unavailable." This is after a fresh restart
2017 Aug 26
2
DC Upgrade from 4.1.7 to 4.6.7
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] De la part de Rowland
> Penny via samba
> Envoyé : lundi 21 août 2017 16:34
> À : samba at lists.samba.org
> Objet : Re: [Samba] DC Upgrade from 4.1.7 to 4.6.7
>
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:52:01 +0400
> HB via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
2017 Jan 27
0
samba 4.4
I'm trying to upgrade our old DC's from samba 4.2 to samba 4.4. Rather
than upgrade in-place, I am creating new DCs and then joining them. This
generally seems to work as expected, except outbound replication seems to
fail.
[root at newDC samba-4.4.4]# samba-tool drs replicate newDC oldDC CN=Configuration,DC=ad,DC=mydomain,DC=com -U Administrator
Replicate from oldDC to newDC was
2019 Apr 17
2
Is possible use BIND9 as DNS Back End on a new Samba DC?
Rowland,
My configure line is ./configure --enable-debug --enable-selftest
--with-systemd.
A hour ago, I ignored the inconsistency that I reported in the first e-mail
of this topic and I proceeded as described at topic "Joining a Samba DC to
an Existing Active Directory" and I joined new DC with command:
samba-tool domain join mydomain.com DC -U"MYDOMAIN\administrator"
2017 Aug 21
4
DC Upgrade from 4.1.7 to 4.6.7
Hello all,
Our Samba AD DC is running perfectly for years with the following basic
setup (see smb.conf below) :
- one DC running Samba 4.1.7 / CentOS 6.5 (compiled from sources)
- internal DNS
- this DC is also a Print Server
- about 400 PC workstations (mainly win7 Pro / win10 Pro and some XP
Pro), and about 300 users
- several Synology NAS file servers
2013 Aug 15
2
Samba4 and iptables
Hi everyone,
I had posted recently about getting Samba4 to work on CentOS 6.4 but
having changes only replicating in one direction, from the Win2k3 AD but
not back to it. I solved the problem, this time, by disabling iptables.
I find it a bit hard to understand. These are the rules I have set up:
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [52:5888]
-A INPUT -m state
2017 Aug 26
0
DC Upgrade from 4.1.7 to 4.6.7
On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 11:28:00 +0400
HB via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] De la part de
> > Rowland Penny via samba
> > Envoyé : lundi 21 août 2017 16:34
> > À : samba at lists.samba.org
> > Objet : Re: [Samba] DC Upgrade from 4.1.7 to 4.6.7
> >
2017 Aug 26
2
DC Upgrade from 4.1.7 to 4.6.7
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] De la part de Rowland
> Penny via samba
> Envoyé : samedi 26 août 2017 12:00
> À : samba at lists.samba.org
> Objet : Re: [Samba] DC Upgrade from 4.1.7 to 4.6.7
>
...
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 11:28:00 +0400
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have begun to add a new 4.6.7 DC (following
2013 Sep 06
0
Samba 4 "TKEY is unacceptable" driving me NUTS!
I've installed Samba 4.09 on ubuntu with bind 9.8.1-P1, the former compiled from git source and the latter installed from apt-get. I'm migrating from an existing Windows 2008 SBS domain controller that I want to retire (and be Windows free on the server side), and have followed the instructions on the Samba wiki for setting up Bind and migrating.
When I run a samba_dnsupate -verbose
2023 Feb 13
1
access "claim types"
On 13/02/2023 13:04, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote:
> I am a bit confused right now (maybe always): you told me "Administrator
> shouldn't own anything on Unix"
From the Unix end, you should never find Administrator owning anything.
This is because, as my example showed. as a Unix use, Administrator is
just a normal, unprivileged user e.g. my example Unix
2023 Feb 13
1
access "claim types"
Am 13.02.23 um 12:14 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
>> # ls -n
>> insgesamt 24
>> drwxrwxr-x+ 4 0 10512 4096? 9. Dez 20:43 Test1
>> drwxrwxr-x+ 2 0 10512 4096? 9. Dez 20:41 test2
>> drwxrwxr-x+ 2 0 10512 4096? 9. Dez 20:41 test3
>>
>> gid 10512 should be "domain admins" or in this case german
>> "dom?nen-admins" with an ugly
2014 May 22
1
Problem with SAMBA 4 on Debian default installation
Dear All,
I have samba 4 installation which was upgraded from samba 3. Everything was
working fine for about 6 months. Then I don't remember what I have done but
after restart of server, it is impossible to log into Windows using
Workgroup.
The setup consists of several Windows XP and Windows 7 computer. Samba jest
PDC.
Looks like problems with configuration of Kerberos or around it.
2019 Apr 17
2
Is possible use BIND9 as DNS Back End on a new Samba DC?
Rowland,
I've done almost all permissions change, I forgot bind-dns directory. Now,
the named service still doesn't start and journalctl -xe showed me that
this occurs because permission denied to run dlz_bind9_9.so. I've checked
out and the lib and directory /usr/local/samba/lib/bind9/ have execute
permission to named group. The output of ls command, journalctl -xe and
2015 May 08
2
samba 4.2.1 RDP && restrict anonymous = 2 problem
RDP working configuration:
restrict anonymous = 0
auth methods = sam winbind
server services = winbindd, s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, cldap, ldap,
kdc, drepl, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate
dcerpc endpoint servers = epmapper, wkssvc, rpcecho, samr,
netlogon, lsarpc, spoolss, drsuapi, dssetup, unixinfo, browser, eventlog6,
backupkey, dnsserver, remote, winreg, srvsvc
RDP
2015 Apr 24
5
Strange GPO rights samba 4.2.1
Hai,
?
Im having a strange thing with sernet samba 4.2.1 on debian wheezy.
?
I installed 2 dc.s with my scripts.
?
i did setup the sysvol replication and now im seeing the following when i create new policies.
?
The default GPO's
drwxrwx---+ 4 root????????? BUILTIN\administrators 4096 Apr 24 10:17 {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}
drwxrwx---+ 4 root????????? BUILTIN\administrators
2015 Apr 13
3
samba 4.2 RDP problem
Hi Heinz,
Baris wrote me the following:
> i'm using samba4 and RDP running....
> my configuration:
>
> smb.conf
>
> ..
> auth methods = sam, winbind, ntdomain, ntdomain:winbind
> server services = s3fs, winbind, rpc, nbt, wrepl, cldap, ldap, kdc, drepl, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate
> dcerpc endpoint servers = epmapper, wkssvc, rpcecho, samr, netlogon,
2015 May 08
1
samba 4.2.1 RDP && restrict anonymous = 2 problem
On 08/05/15 19:36, Rowland Penny wrote:
> On 08/05/15 18:51, bar?? tombul wrote:
>> RDP working configuration:
>>
>> restrict anonymous = 0
>> auth methods = sam winbind
>> server services = winbindd, s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, cldap, ldap,
>> kdc, drepl, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate
>> dcerpc endpoint servers =