similar to: /var/lock/samba filling up /run/lock

Hi, I'm hunting a bug in 3.0.x (tested on 3.0.10 and 3.0.20). Users can create and modfy files, but cannot delete them. The logs show [2005/09/21 20:48:14, 0, pid=18388, effective(4019, 412), real(4019, 0)] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767) tdb(/srv/physik.fu-berlin.de/data/.samba/cluster1-test/cache/locking.tdb): expand_file ftruncate to 8192 failed (Permission denied) [2005/09/21 20:48:15, 0,

Hi, I'm working with Prof. Zadok on versionfs, a stackable versioning file system. I face some problems with the unlink operation on ext3 with htree. On an unlink, I make a copy of the file (version/backup) and unlink the original file. But some files that have been unlinked are "linked back" to another file. For example, on deleting the file 'foo', the file itself is

Hello, In regards to this thread: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-September/111158.html I might be seeing a similar compatibility with this call is on Virtuozzo based system. > cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Linux release 9 (Shrike) > uname -a Linux hostname 2.6.8-022stab078.9-enterprise #1 SMP Thu Jun 8 12:38:51 MSD 2006 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux > mount /dev/vzfs on /

Hi all,. I'm getting this:- [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 8] lib/util.c:(1274) fcntl_lock 6 34 0 1 2 [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 8] lib/util.c:(1314) fcntl_lock: Lock call successful [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 5] tdb/tdbutil.c:(475) tdb((NULL)): tdb_brlock failed (fd=7) at offset 4 rw_type=2 lck_type=6 [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 5] smbd/connection.c:(156) claiming 0 [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 0]

I cannot mount my Samba shares. I could, then I rebooted my device, and now I no longer can. The .conf file has not been changed in over a year. Here is the output of the log file: -bash-2.05b$ cat log.192.168.1.147 [2011/08/23 00:41:10, 0] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_log(662) tdb(/opt/local/var/locks/sessionid.tdb): expand_file to 20480 failed (No space left on device) [2011/08/23 00:41:10, 1]

Hi Ted and all, I have a couple of questions near the end of this message, but first I have to describe my problem in some detail. The power failure on Thursday did something evil to my ext3 file system (box running RH9+patches, ext3, /dev/md0, raid5 driver, 400GB f/s using 3x200GB IDE drives and one hot-spare). The f/s got corrupt badly and the symptoms are very similar to what Eddy described

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- - --------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory Synopsis: Buffer overrun in amd Advisory ID: RHSA-1999:032-01 Issue date: 1999-08-30 Keywords: amd am-utils buffer overflow remote exploit - --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Topic: New packages of am-utils

I'm running 2.11, and I've noticed a number of log entries that look like so: angie.log: tdb(/usr/local/samba/var/locks/locking.tdb): expand_file ftruncate to 8192 failed (Permission denied) [2004/10/03 15:14:36, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(531) tdb(/usr/local/samba/var/locks/brlock.tdb): expand_file ftruncate to 8192 failed (Permission denied) The files in question look like this:

I'm running 2.11, and I've noticed a number of log entries that look like so: angie.log: tdb(/usr/local/samba/var/locks/locking.tdb): expand_file ftruncate to 8192 failed (Permission denied) [2004/10/03 15:14:36, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(531) tdb(/usr/local/samba/var/locks/brlock.tdb): expand_file ftruncate to 8192 failed (Permission denied) The files in question look like this:

Hello. In our samba configuration, the lock directory is located on an NFS mount. It seems that for some reason this causes many problems: Some applications fail to save files properly (eg matlab), some applications fail to print (eg acrobat reader), and each time those application fail, we got a message on the log saying [2004/02/16 10:19:35, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(724)

Hi, we're working on a stackable versioning file system for 2.4.x. Versioning can easily create lots of files for a file that gets modified frequently, and our current design puts all versions of a file in the same directory as the main file. We are therefore evaluating how stable and efficient different combinations of file systems would be in this scenario. We've run our versionfs on

Freshmeat says: Following up to yesterday's Linux 2.0.38 release, Alan Cox sent out a security notice about a remote network DoS vulnerability which is present in all Linux 2.0.x systems. Linux 2.2.x is not affected by this bug. Causing this requires a great deal of skill and probably a reasonably local network access as it is extremely timing dependant. Nevertheless everyone is advised to

Hello, I am seeing sporadic duplicate read requests from lpxelinux.0 (6.03 from kernel.org), which results in a failed PXE boot. This happens only sporadic, but happens often enough to be annoying. The TFTP server serving lpxelinux.0 is running CentOS 7.6 with all updates applied. The client machine initiates the PXE boot, receives the lpxelinux.0 binary, downloads ldlinux.c32 and proceeds to

Hi, When I try to execute the following: smbclient -U% -L localhost I receive the following error: tdb(/usr/local/samba/var/locks/gencache.tdb): expand_file write of 1024 failed (Invalid argument) [2003/10/26 19:45:58, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_with_timeout(279) read_socket_with_timeout: timeout read. read error = Broken pipe. protocol negotiation failed Any ideas anyone? I have

Hello, I am using Red-hat Linux Application Server 3.0. I have installed and successfully configured samba server & thus able to connect from windows m/c....It works perfectly fine. But when I install our product( Its a java application and one kernel loadable module) on the same machine The samba server does not restart. Following are the messages in /var/log/samba/smbd.log. after

I've run into a problem with samba and tdb reporting "too many connections" If I do a typical configure: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba \ --localstatedir=/var/samba \ --with-lockdir=/var/samba/locks \ --with-configdir=/usr/local/samba/etc I see errors like the following in /var/samba/log.smbd: [2001/11/10 22:58:53, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(342)

Hello, I am wondering if this is preferred at this iteration in development. If so, what would be the best way to continue? To build a VM server and have that do file serving, then migrate file serving from the old ad, then join the new VM to the ad server? Vice versa? My reasoning; running sernet (Version 4.0.12-SerNet-Ubuntu-8.precise) with Ubuntu 12.0.2 and since deployment in three different

Hi, I have compiled then installed Samba 3.6.22 on my AIX 5.2. When I start SMBD it systematicaly corrupts the filesystem on which it is installed and fails to start I start SMBD on an other port because an old samba (2.2.8) is already running and I have to validate 3.6.22 before shuting down the old one. You'll see more informations bellow : - smbd output - IBM errpt corruption report

Andre, Are you going to have time to MFC things from -current for auto-tuning -stable before 9.2? I fear (maybe unnecessarily?) that we are about to ship yet another release that can't do basic 10gigE when sufficient memory exists. If you don't have time, then let me know and I'll see what I can do. -- Alfred Perlstein VP Software Engineering, iXsystems

Hi? I have setup a samba 4 DC with mixed client environment. My problem is that the mac osx client are unable to write to a samba 4 share. I tested mac osx clients on a normal windows 7 share and it works fine I tested mac osx clients on a samba 3.5 .. share and everything works fine. As i am in a professional environment and all the windows clients are already binded to the samba 4 domain i