similar to: Samba4 & Delegation

Hello, Not sure if this is the right forum for this question, but since I am running a Samba4 DC I thought I'd start here. I have create a separate OU to manage Groups and Users for Applications: 1) ou=myappX,ou=app,dc=mydomain,dc=home All Users (and other groups, e.g. Domain Users) are obviously found in : 2) cn=users,dc=mydomain,dc=home So I created a service

Hello, Now that I have my Samba4 DC running great on CentOS6.4 I was wondering if somebody could help understand better how to install and configure Samba4 with winbind and PAM. I used the tutorial here: [http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/Winbind](http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/Winbind) This got me through to the point where "Using pam_winbind" starts.

On Sun, 2013-05-12 at 06:24 -0700, daniel gonzalez wrote: > > > i need a practical example of samba-tool of delegation of > permissions ,for allow supporters to join machines to the > domain. > Use samba 4.0.5 > Thank you very much. > > I think this may be easier done using the Active Directory Users an

Thanks Daniel for the info. Siddharth On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Dániel Krupp <daniel.krupp at ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi Siddharth, > > > > since the CTU functionality is not yet part of the mainline clang (review > ongoing), you will need to clone our patched version of clang5 > > https://github.com/Ericsson/clang > > (ctu-clang5 branch) > > >

List: Sorry for posting to this list but could not find step by step instructions anywhere nor get any concerned list to respond. Newbie to DNS technicals but can work with instructions if given in ./configure for complete idiots ;-) 1. I have taken a static IP from my ISP 203.134.221.162 and the ISP has put up an entry in APNIC whois (please check the same)...to me it seems incomplete, as it

hi all, i'm managing a large installation of a dovecot cluster in director + NFS backend architecture and we are moving from NFSv3 to NFSv4. Our NFS server is a Netapp in clustered mode and reading technical specs of NFSv4 delegation feature it seems that enabling delegation in this type of dovecot architecture should bring great benefits: only one backend server access a specific mailbox at a

Hi, last day I tried to enable "nfsv4 delegation" on my cluster (enable nfsv4.0 and read delegation on Netapp and remount the volume on Linux Centos 6.7 clients with Dovecot+Director). It was a failure, after some minutes the load on clients was high, and in dovecot.log I found these errors (repeated continuously): Aug 17 20:28:17 pop01eeh dovecot: imap(info at domain.com): Error:

I''ve been working on a plugin called Http Test where I add HTML validation and link checking to controller and integration tests through an after filter in ApplicationController. I used to mix in a bunch of methods that I needed into the ApplicationController class, but to me this had a bad smell, so I broke much of the code out into separate classes that I delegate to.

I ran samba-tool delegation show administrator and got this: athena:~# samba-tool delegation show administrator Account-DN: CN=Administrator,CN=Users,DC=edm-inc,DC=com UF_TRUSTED_FOR_DELEGATION: False UF_TRUSTED_TO_AUTHENTICATE_FOR_DELEGATION: False Is this legit?? Shouldn't the domain administrator be true for these? -- Bob Wooldridge EDM Incorporated

Alessio Cecchi wrote: [...] > Have you already try to run NFSv4? it's in place on a (very) small sample of mailboxes in dbox format, no issues up to now (Debian Wheezy mainline kernel) > When we switch to netapp and nfsv4 we had many problems (lock problems > and instability) and we had to go immediately to NFSv3. I don't know if > was a netapp problem or nfs client (Debian

Hello, We're a rather largish university (largest in Israel), with some 60-70k users, using Dovecot 1.2.14 (we're cautious about moving to 2.0.x for now). We need to provide admin rights to faculty computer/IT staff, so they can have access to the mailboxes of their respective users. We use LDAP as an authentication/authorization backend. Currently, dovecot has a "master

Is there an DHCPv6 client in CentOS that supports prefix delegation correctly? The old version of dhclient can't set a requested prefix delegation length, so isn't very useful, and I can't get the even-older wide-dhcpv6 from EPEL to work. -- Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net>

Il 18/08/2015 17:25, Tom Talpey ha scritto: > On 8/18/2015 10:46 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> in this tipical setup (Dovecot/Director thate share Maildir via NFS) on >> your NFS Server you have (about) 90% of read operations and only 10% of >> write operations. >> >> If you see detailed stats for NFS operations you have 40-50% of GETATTR,

Hi, we're planning a Samba 3 to Samba 4 upgrade, and we're quite happy with the tests we've done. Everything worked as expected, and I hope that the migration will be done without major issues (famous last words). But we're having some problems with subdomain delegation. Our setup is formed by the Samba server and a DNS server running Bind 9. The DNS server is used

Hi All, I have setup samba as Active Directory Domain Controller as per the steps mentioned in wiki page https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_an_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller I have also setup squid proxy with kerberos auth on other machine as per the steps mentioned on squid wiki page. However I couldn't find any documentation to do a KCD setup. Here are things I

Hey Guys, Wanted to let you know about an event delegation library that interacts with Scriptaculous that we''ve used to make interactive UI elements with really clean code. We used it with Scriptaculous to create the scrolling widgets on the homepage of http://javascriptmvc.com/. It''s called Controller and it is an event delegation library that helps logically organize your

Just read about the Casting gem: https://discuss.gemnasium.com/t/casting-adding-behavior-to-objects-without-using-extend/34 https://github.com/saturnflyer/casting What are the Rails core team''s opinions about using Casting vs. ActiveSupport::Concern usage, Rails delegation, etc.? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails:

Il 12/06/2015 13:02, brd ha scritto: > Alessio Cecchi wrote: > [...] >> Have you already try to run NFSv4? > it's in place on a (very) small sample of mailboxes in dbox format, no issues > up to now (Debian Wheezy mainline kernel) Good to know, let me know what will be when the load will grow. >> When we switch to netapp and nfsv4 we had many problems (lock problems

Hi, We're implementing RPCSEC_GSS with authentication against AD in our NFSv3 environment. Our Windows users use Samba to access NFS storage from their laptops. What would be the best way to configure Samba to "forward" the credentials from Windows laptop to be able to access NFS on user's behalf? I saw some notes about Kerberos delegation in Samba 4 - is it ready for

On 03/11/15 08:10, Davor Vusir wrote: > > > No, Davor. That won't work. The delegated user account is not member > of 'AD\Domain Admins' which is member of the group > 'SERVER\Administrators'. You have to use the username map to be able > to add the first AD-group or account to 'SERVER\Administrators'. > No, Davor, you don't have to use a