similar to: Samba4 DNS (bind_dlz) management issue on CentOS

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Samba4 DNS (bind_dlz) management issue on CentOS"

2013 Dec 18
1
Samba4 as AD DC, with one anonymous read-only share
Hello all, I have several Samba4 DCs that host various production shares. I need one share, however, available as a read-only guest share (anonymous) that will be used as a software distribution share point. I have been unable to make it work (the servers prompt me for a valid username and password on that share). I have done some googling and it seems that this functionality might be
2006 Jun 01
2
skype out
Hello All, Complete newbie to asterisk (OH NO). Is it possible to use my skype out account for an outgoing trunk? If so, can the syntax be found somewhere? Thanks, Peter -- cybersource.us 115 Richfield Road Williamsville, New York 14221 716-553-8525
2013 Apr 09
1
(D)DNS Updates with GNU/Linux clients in a samba 4 AD environment (BIND_DLZ)
Hi ! I bounce on the Mr Sloop's post ([Samba] DDNS / DHCPd && Internal DNS or BIND_DLZ) to ask what's the easiest way to allow Linux clients to update themself their DNS record in the Samba4 AD server (with BIND_DLZ Dns server). It works well with windows clients, but with Linux clients joined to the domain, with a valid Kerberos ticket, the client receive a error
2020 Sep 11
3
dnsvi and bind_dlz
Hello is there a way to use dnsvi with samba bind_dlz? When i use this i get error update failed: NOTAUTH
2017 Nov 28
0
Debian Buster, bind_dlz, and apparmor
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:37:22 -0600 Dale Schroeder via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On 11/28/2017 2:38 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:53:32 -0600 > > Dale Schroeder via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> Last week, Debian testing (Buster) added apparmor to the list of > >>
2020 Sep 11
1
dnsvi and bind_dlz
Only because the DC's that are out of sync. Fix that and this is not needed. Also, Use samba-tool https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_Administration Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > basti via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 11 september 2020 10:13 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >
2012 Mar 17
3
how to allow ISC dhcpd to add/update entries to bind9 with bind_dlz (samba4)
Hello all, I have set up a samba4 server with bind9 and the bind_dlz module. Everything is working as it should but now I need to allow the dhcp server to add entries to the forwarding zone. Has anybody implemented such a configuration ? Can this be done with the kerberos DNS dynamic update configuration. I want to achieve the following: 1) allow non-Windows machines (printers, ILO ...) to be
2013 Apr 08
0
DDNS / DHCPd && Internal DNS or BIND_DLZ
So, I don't see much on the Wiki [actually nothing] and the relevant threads on the issue are few. So, let me try to outline what appears to be the current state of things and if I'm wrong, please correct me. Running DHCPd on the Samba 4 server works fine. Doing DDNS [dynamic DNS] updates can work with the BIND9_DLZ setup, but not the internal DNS setup. However, if the connecting Samba
2015 Aug 27
0
Samba Internal DNS vs. BIND_DLZ
On 27/08/15 20:49, Jim Seymour wrote: > Hi All, > > Well, after going in something of the Wrong Direction, I figure on > starting over. > > Now: Looking at the docs, ISTM that BIND_DLZ is kind of a PITA. So, > being as I need the BIND (server also is the nameserver for the entire > LAN), and the recommendation is to put the AD PDC in a sub-domain, > anyway, I was
2015 Aug 28
2
Samba Internal DNS vs. BIND_DLZ
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:51:30 +0100 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > ... what you seem > to be missing is that you run bind9 instead of the internal samba4 > DNS server. Whatever DNS server you do use, it needs to only know > about the samba4 dns domain (which also needs to be the realm name), > anything else it gets from its forwarder. I did not miss
2015 Aug 28
0
More on bind_dlz - documentation I have not found
On 28/08/15 13:15, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > In the shower this morning, I realized that samba's dlz is through its > ldap interface, probably through dhcp. :) > > All of that work researching how to set up a dlz database for naught. > This is NOT documented in either: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS > or >
2015 Sep 01
0
Samba AD PDC , LDAP and Single-Sign-On (was: re: Samba Internal DNS vs. BIND_DLZ)
Hai Jim, what is your looking for. Im using a SSO for my Zarafa mail server. Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Jim Seymour >Verzonden: maandag 31 augustus 2015 21:21 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: [Samba] Samba AD PDC , LDAP and Single-Sign-On >(was: re: Samba Internal DNS vs. BIND_DLZ)
2016 Oct 21
0
Bind_DLZ and two AD DC
On 21/10/16 20:02, Means, Jeffrey D. wrote: > > Just out of curiosity last night I was messing atoms with my samba > setup and added a second DC to my domain whole the first DC was > running bind_dlz the second was running samba_internal and for some > reason I started seeing keytab failures and lots of issues where DNS > updates were not replicating between the two DC's. Any
2016 Oct 21
0
Bind_DLZ and two AD DC
On 21/10/16 20:11, Means, Jeffrey D. wrote: > > I guess my real question is do I have to have all my DC's running > either samba_internal or bind_dlz... ie do they have to all run the > same DNS server software... > > Simple answer - Yes, all your DCs need to run the same DNS implementation. Mixing is not supported. You can convert your DCs at any time but it's probably
2016 Oct 21
0
Bind_DLZ and two AD DC
>> Simple answer - Yes, all your DCs need to run the same DNS >> implementation. Mixing is not supported. You can convert your DCs at >> any time but it's probably better to decide before deployment. >> >> Cheers >> >> Alex > Alex, I am a Bit perplexed here, you seem to be replying to posts that > have never been posted to the list and whilst
2016 Oct 22
0
Bind_DLZ and two AD DC
On 22/10/16 08:44, Michael Howard via samba wrote: > >> In fact on the subject "Bind_DLZ and two AD DC" you replied just before >> I did. >> > The confusion probably arises from the fact that two of your replies > on this thread are in response to 'Means, Jeffrey D.', who doesn't > appear to have posted in this thread. > In fact, he
2016 Dec 19
0
Dynamic DNS and bind_dlz
Hi Mark, Am 19.12.2016 um 21:25 schrieb Mark Nienberg via samba: > I'm trying to troubleshoot why our workstations have stopped dynamically > registering their ip addresses in our AD using bind_dlz setup. It worked > for a couple of months and now does not. I realized I have a basic question > about how it is supposed to work. > > Do the workstations (after getting a
2020 Sep 11
1
dnsvi and bind_dlz
we have our own dnsvi based on nsupdate. i have problems with dns names, that are exists on dc2 but not on dc1. its faster then alwasy use a windows gui :-D On 11.09.20 10:06, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 11/09/2020 08:31, basti via samba wrote: >> Hello is there a way to use dnsvi with samba bind_dlz? >> When i use this i get error update failed: NOTAUTH >> > I
2016 Oct 22
2
Bind_DLZ and two AD DC
On 21/10/2016 21:58, Alex Crow via samba wrote: >>> Simple answer - Yes, all your DCs need to run the same DNS >>> implementation. Mixing is not supported. You can convert your DCs at >>> any time but it's probably better to decide before deployment. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Alex >> Alex, I am a Bit perplexed here, you seem to
2015 Aug 27
0
Samba Internal DNS vs. BIND_DLZ
On 27/08/15 21:42, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > On 08/27/2015 04:37 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 27/08/15 21:23, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 08/27/2015 04:18 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: >>>> Hello Jim, >>>> >>>> Am 27.08.2015 um 21:49 schrieb Jim Seymour: >>>>> BIND would be the auth