similar to: SAMBA MIGRATION: Help!

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "SAMBA MIGRATION: Help!"

2001 Jan 24
1
Samba erors...
What can i do about this... ~~ # smbstatus Can't create or use IPC area. Error was File exists ERROR: Failed to initialise share modes Can't initialise shared memory - exiting In log-uri: Jan 24 07:22:41 lapd smbd[19406]: [2001/01/24 07:22:41, 0] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(667) Jan 24 07:22:41 lapd smbd[19406]: Can't create or use IPC area. Error was File exists Jan 24
2010 Sep 10
0
covariance matrix structure for random effect in glmmPQL
Dear all, I'm using R function "glmmPQL" in "MASS" package for generalized linear mixed model considering the temporal correlations in random effect. There are 1825 observations in my data, in which the random effect is called "Date", and there are five levels in "Date", each repeats 365 times. When I tried
2009 Oct 26
1
strange log values in 3.1
I've just got the log lines below. The first line shows the format spec that prints each column: %'b %'l %f 0 18,760 f1 0 11,193 f2 32,768 2,186 f3 3,128,368 3,453,856 f4 13,680 11,786 f5 32,768 6,288 f6 0 6,498 f7 0 6,346 f8 0 6,570 f9
2013 Jan 18
1
F18 import error?
Should I be concerned? [root@fs1 ~]# cobbler import --name=F18 --path=rsync://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/18/Fedora/x86_64/os --arch=x86_64 task started: 2013-01-18_062009_import task started (id=Media import, time=Fri Jan 18 06:20:09 2013) Found a redhat compatible signature: Packages adding distros creating new distro: F18-x86_64 creating new profile: F18-x86_64 associating repos
2012 Jan 25
1
loops
I've been struggling to get a loop to work. I want to create a new variable in each loop with data from some function. for example: # part of the names for the variables to be created Frags <- c("F04", "F05", "F07", "F09", "F11", "F13", "F14", "F17", "F18", "F19", "P20",
2020 Apr 06
2
F18 ready to be merged + preview of merge
Hi llvm-dev We believe we have completed enough of the agreed pre-upstreaming changes to start talking about merging F18 into LLVM. The live status is tracked at [1]. There are a few details that we have not managed to hammer out and we propose to tackle inside the LLVM monorepo. I have put a summary of these at the bottom of this mail. Does anyone have any objections to flang being merged into
2019 Jul 10
2
Standalone server and POSIX ACL issue
Le 10/07/2019 ? 08:46, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 09/07/2019 22:49, Yvan Masson wrote: >> Le 09/07/2019 ? 21:16, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: >>> On 09/07/2019 20:06, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> First, thanks for all people that continuously giving great advice >>>> on this list!
2020 Apr 07
3
F18 ready to be merged + preview of merge
Hi Mehdi, I can't replicate those failures at my end, could you let me know what OS, compiler and CMake flags you're using so I can try and reproduce? Thanks! David Truby ________________________________ From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Sent: 07 April 2020 06:44 To: Richard Barton
2005 Jun 05
4
Problems with testing Openldapserver telnet localhost 389
Hello! Server Starting is ok: no errormessage: /usr/lib/openldap/slapd restart But Testing, not: amd:~ # telnet localhost 389 Trying 127.0.0.1... telnet: connect to address 127.0.0.1: Connection refused Trying ::1... telnet: connect to address ::1: Connection refused amd:/usr/lib/openldap # ps -agx | grep lapd Warning: bad ps syntax, perhaps a bogus '-'? See
2020 Apr 07
3
F18 ready to be merged + preview of merge
Attached is the log. I'm building with: clang version 10.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/ 3a6da1122b990386edeba0987d0d1fdc9c8dc53d) Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Thread model: posix On some Ubuntu-like distribution. I also ran with ASAN once and it found a bunch of leaks in bin/tco. Best, -- Mehdi On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 4:36 AM Richard Barton <Richard.Barton at
2019 Dec 18
2
Flang landing in the monorepo
Hi Eric, Apologies, I failed to disambiguate clearly, because there are multiple projects named flang. I was referring to the "new" flang, whose repository is currently found at https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18. It will land in the monorepo under a directory called "/flang/". f18 has been approved to join, for reference see "[llvm-dev] f18 is accepted as part of
2008 Feb 13
1
acl, no rights and possibility to delete files
Hello, I've a samba 3.0.24 and a share in ext3 with acl. I've set on a file the following permissions on a file a.txt : vssamba:/# getfacl /mnt/samba/partage/a.txt getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: mnt/samba/partage/a.txt # owner: herve # group: users user::rwx group::r-- other::r-- The rights for share "Partage" are : [partage]
2019 Feb 26
2
RFC for f18+runtimes in LLVM
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 5:46 PM Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:06 AM Stephen Scalpone via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> * The current f18 code will be committed to the new LLVM subproject. The >> f18 code is a set of libraries that implements the Fortran compiler. >>
2019 Dec 19
2
F18-LLVM: Unanswered but important points
Hello, This is regarding recent/ongoing discussions about F18 being merged in LLVM. I was going through these threads, and I found few important points which were possibly left unanswered (or I might have missed few threads). URL: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2019-December/000120.html Point: Is (3) AST -> FIR -> MLIR LLVM-IR -> LLVM-IR) in a shape where we can
2019 Feb 26
2
RFC for f18+runtimes in LLVM
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 2:45 PM Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:06 AM Stephen Scalpone via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> * The current f18 code will be committed to the new LLVM subproject. The >> f18 code is a set of libraries that implements the Fortran compiler. >>
2020 Jan 15
3
Flang landing in the monorepo - next Monday!
Hi Eric, Renato Thanks again for the engagement and challenge on this, it is really useful feedback to know what we need to do to get F18 into the project in a way that everyone is happy with. I have tried to give timelines on the points addressed below where I can today. Clearly we need to do some work on points 8-11, but are the above plans/answers to points 1-7 sufficient at this stage and
2002 Sep 21
2
Hy ..
I have a problem joining a win2k to a samba domain .. When i try to add the wink machine it says somthing about the trust relationship between the wwin2k and samba Thankyou, Excuse my bad english .. -- --------------- http://lapd.cj.edu.ro/~seby E-mail: seby@lapd.cj.edu.ro ---------------
2020 Feb 25
2
Plan for landing flang in monorepo
Can you elaborate on this? - to move the std::string/string_view/StringRef changes to pre-merge unless you're going to have someone dedicated to handling them post-merge (rather than "time permits"). The C vs C++ ism here is fairly strong and I'd like to get the C-style string handling out fairly quickly. I understood this item to be looking into replacing uses of std::string
2020 Feb 25
2
Plan for landing flang in monorepo
Hi Eric, Old flang certainly uses C-style strings but f18 uses std::string with few exceptions. Most of the instances in f18 of “char *” aren’t really strings in the C sense – they’re not null terminated and are really just pointers into raw or cooked source files/streams. I can’t think of an instance where the compiler dynamically allocates an array of characters and uses it as a C string. -
2019 Mar 01
5
RFC for f18+runtimes in LLVM
"Finkel, Hal J. via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > And then there is also the argument for reusing Clang tooling, > which David Greene keeps making, though that idea does not seem to > get a lot of interest. > > > I disagree. There's been a lot of interest in modeling Flang's tooling > after Clang's