similar to: Please HELP: how to delete all messages older than X days

Hello, Would you please help me solve the following case? My (CentOS) server runs dovecot and allows both POP3 and IMAP service. Users are virtual users (no home directories), with messages stored in Maildir directories under /var/spool/mail/vhosts/example.com/username Some of them use mobile devices (without local storage space), so I must allow IMAP access, not just POP3. But the storage

Hello, I've recently saw a discussion on this list, about a standardised way of emptying POP3 mailboxes on the server - but no solution came up. Please provide a suggestion for the following situation: - I am running a stock POP3 dovecot server, on Fedora 12 (dovecot version 1.2.9) - passwd-file authentication via /etc/imap.passwd - users are virtual, sharing the same UID/GID; -

Hello, Please excuse my (probably newbie) question, but: Since RouterOS, MikroTik's proprietary OS, is largely based on GNU/Linux, anyone knows a way to run tinc on a MikroTik device? This would be in order to make an (imposed, no choice given...) MikroTik device (say the B1100AHX4 router) to participate in a tinc mesh, in interoperation with GNU/Linux machines. Please see:

La 25.09.2015 13:00, tinc-request at tinc-vpn.org a scris: > Unfortunately, this is not something that maps well to systemd. It would > require a systemd to run a script that parses the sysconfig file and > start all the tinc daemons. Systemd will then put all those daemons in > the same control group and won't recognize something is wrong if only > one of the daemons fail. So

Hello, Please tell me if it's possible to use tinc together with OSPF (instead of static routes in LAN). By OSPF I mean Quagga's GNU/Linux daemon. Namely, I have a group of LANs (private 192.168.x.0/24 each). Each LAN has a GNU/Linux default gateway, 192.168.x.1, that also connects to the Internet via a public IP address (does NAT and firewall for the LAN "behind" it). tinc

Hello all, Thank you for tinc, that is an **excellent** and useful package! Taking into account that both Red Hat and Debian (8.x) families now use systemd, there is, IMHO, one small. but important correction to be done: tinc's initialization. IMHO, we need: 1. A proper tinc.service file, included by default (prepackaged) in the stock .deb and .rpm packages in Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu,

Hello, Is this the proper place to suggest an enhancement for the stock dovecot package ? The enhancement would be the following: For the time being, the dovecotpw utility offers a standardised way to interactively encode a user password in a certain scheme, say: dovecotpw -s CRYPT Enter new passord: Re-enter new password: etc. Given a *valid* /etc/imap.passwd file (passwd-file

Hello again, >From the point of view of a Red Hat *user*, the standardised way of doing things would be to have an /etc/sysconfig/tinc file containing something like: NETWORKS="vpn1 vpn2 vpn3" (one or more names separated by spaces) At initialization, each name should launch a separate tinc instance (a different VPN) tinc service should not start until the user adds at least

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 05:45:36PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 05:51:30PM +0300, R?zvan Sandu wrote: > > > IMHO, we need: > > > > 1. A proper tinc.service file, included by default (prepackaged) in the > > stock .deb and .rpm packages in Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, CentOS, etc. > > > > By "proper" I mean it will start

*hvjunk said:* > Get a RPi (or faster/cheaper/equivalent), and bridge it into the Mikrotik………. Unfortunately, I don't think this is an option (even if I may put there a full PC, not only a Raspberry Pi), for a few reasons: - what I'm trying to achieve is to substitute MikroTik's native L2TP/IPSec tunnels with tinc, not to have TWO tunnels - supposing I have two different tunnels

Hello, Since the present tinc documentation is not very clear about this, please explain the following: is it mandatory to include the local IP address classes in the global VPN address class? Namely, please consider the following setup (which works great in practice): 1. A tinc VPN, full mesh, with n nodes (n > 3) 2. tinc runs on the firewall, which is also the default gateway for each

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 05:51:30PM +0300, R?zvan Sandu wrote: > Taking into account that both Red Hat and Debian (8.x) families now use > systemd, there is, IMHO, one small. but important correction to be done: > tinc's initialization. > > IMHO, we need: > > 1. A proper tinc.service file, included by default (prepackaged) in the > stock .deb and .rpm packages in

Would it not make more sense to have this on packagers responsiblity instead like you were saying adding it into the upstream repo. Maybe have a secondary repo that people can contribute to for distribution specific files and install scripts. On 24 September 2015 at 21:30, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 05:45:36PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote: >

No luck with qemu-kvm-ev, the behavior is the same. Running perf record -a -g on the baremetal shows that most of the CPU time is in _raw_spin_lock Children Self Command Shared Object Symbol - 93.62% 93.62% qemu-kvm [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_lock - _raw_spin_lock + 45.30%

For myself KSM is unpredictable feature. The problem is Compute, just this node does "copy on write" , so only Compute. My concern exactly is where would it lead to worse or better Guest behavior ? I am not expecting complete fix. I would track via top/htop and dmesg via Cron on 1-2 hr period. ________________________________ From: centos-virt-bounces at centos.org

It sounds weird, but attempt to disable KSM and see would it help or no ? ________________________________ From: centos-virt-bounces at centos.org <centos-virt-bounces at centos.org> on behalf of Laurentiu Soica <laurentiu at soica.ro> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 4:56 AM To: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Nested KVM issue Enabled the

I would enable ksmtuned logging ,if it has been done verify logs ________________________________ From: centos-virt-bounces at centos.org <centos-virt-bounces at centos.org> on behalf of Laurentiu Soica <laurentiu at soica.ro> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 7:16 AM To: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Nested KVM issue Yes. It is on both

Is KSM enabled on your Compute Nodes ( presuming CentOS 7.2 on bare metal ) ? ________________________________ From: centos-virt-bounces at centos.org <centos-virt-bounces at centos.org> on behalf of Laurentiu Soica <laurentiu at soica.ro> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 5:25 AM To: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Nested KVM issue Running the

Sorry, How you trigger the problem ? B. ________________________________ From: centos-virt-bounces at centos.org <centos-virt-bounces at centos.org> on behalf of Laurentiu Soica <laurentiu at soica.ro> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 3:28 AM To: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Nested KVM issue Hello, The issue reproduced again and it

________________________________ From: centos-virt-bounces at centos.org <centos-virt-bounces at centos.org> on behalf of Laurentiu Soica <laurentiu at soica.ro> Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2016 10:17 AM To: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Nested KVM issue More details on the subject: I suppose it is a nested KVM issue because it raised after I