similar to: keywords leak in cmd_append_handle_args()

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "keywords leak in cmd_append_handle_args()"

2015 Oct 07
2
bug report: dovecot-imapd core dump
Hi, could not find it -- back to the list, maybe someone can suggest a fix/workaround. Best, Tamas On Wed, Oct 07 2015, Dominik Breu wrote: > Hello, > > yeah this one looks familiar to me can you search the list back in > september there was a somewhat similar bug with thunderbird imho timo > posted a notice about it. > > greetings, > > dominik > > Am
2015 Oct 10
0
bug report: dovecot-imapd core dump
Hi, Since I did not get any specific suggestions about this bug, I am attaching another backtrace. Any suggestions for workarounds etc would be appreciated -- should I regenerate the index? Or install a dovecot from the repo where this might be fixed? Is this a known bug? Best, Tamas -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dovecot-gdb Type:
2012 May 29
4
per-mailbox message limits
This is something Timo hacked up for me a few years ago and I realised should be on the list in case anyone else wants them. The following patches will limit maildir folders to 4000 messages on Dovecot 2.0.* and 2.1.* The Specfile patch is against the Cityfan Redhat EL5 SRPM but is likely to work on most build platforms Changing the message limit requires a recompile. It's brutal and
2019 Mar 12
3
dovecot-keywords are not preserved any more when moving mails between folders
On Mar 12, 2019, Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > On 12.3.2019 13.46, Piper Andreas via dovecot wrote: > >> after an upgrade of dovecot-2.2.5 to dovecot-2.3.4 the dovecot-keywords, >> which in my case are set by thunderbird, are not preserved any more when >> moving a mail between folders. > > We are aware of this bug, and it's being
2019 Mar 12
3
dovecot-keywords are not preserved any more when moving mails between folders
Hello, after an upgrade of dovecot-2.2.5 to dovecot-2.3.4 the dovecot-keywords, which in my case are set by thunderbird, are not preserved any more when moving a mail between folders. Are there any ideas, what may be the reason. Thanks for any hints on that, Andreas 'doveconf -n' gives: # 2.3.4 (0ecbaf23d): /etc/opt/csw/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.5.4 (60b0f48d) # OS:
2009 Nov 02
2
dovecot-1.2.6: Panic: pool_data_stack_realloc(): stack frame changed
When playing with large numbers of IMAP keywords on dovecot-1.2.6 imap crashed: Panic: pool_data_stack_realloc(): stack frame changed Looks like either maildir_file_do() shouldn't T_BEGIN/T_END or the keywords array should start larger. 0 libSystem.B.dylib 0x00007fff875f4eba __kill + 10 1 libSystem.B.dylib 0x00007fff875f4eac kill + 14 2 libSystem.B.dylib
2019 Mar 13
2
dovecot-keywords are not preserved any more when moving mails between folders
Hello Timo, Am 12.03.19 um 22:31 schrieb Timo Sirainen via dovecot: > On 12 Mar 2019, at 17.55, Dan Christensen via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >> >> On Mar 12, 2019, Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >> >>> On 12.3.2019 13.46, Piper Andreas via dovecot wrote: >>> >>>> after an upgrade of dovecot-2.2.5
2010 Jun 22
1
quota_set leak
The quota plugin in 2.0.beta6 leaks 2KB "quota settings" pools. Here is a patch to plug this leak, assuming you intended the caller of quota_init to retain ownership of the quota_set. If on the other hand you intended for quota_init to assume ownership of the quota_set, then the quota_settings_deinit call belongs in quota_deinit. --- a/src/plugins/quota/quota-storage.c (beta6) +++
2013 Jun 05
3
Samba4 and NVSv4
Short story: cannot get Kerberized NFSv4 to work. I've googled a great deal and cannot find where I have goofed (and there sure is a lot of misleading and just plain incorrect information out there), so would appreciate another pair of eyes. NFSv4 without Kerberos does work fine, as does ID mapping. We're using NFSv4 in production with sec=sys, but I'm not happy with that. My
2013 Jun 05
3
Samba4 and NVSv4
Short story: cannot get Kerberized NFSv4 to work. I've googled a great deal and cannot find where I have goofed (and there sure is a lot of misleading and just plain incorrect information out there), so would appreciate another pair of eyes. NFSv4 without Kerberos does work fine, as does ID mapping. We're using NFSv4 in production with sec=sys, but I'm not happy with that. My
2012 Aug 24
3
quota: ignore deleted messages (?)
Hi! I am currently in the process of preparing a migration of our old Courier-based IMAP/POP server setup to a Dovecot-based one. During this process I came across the following problem with the difference Courier and Dovecot handle deleted messages and mail quota. Quote from http://www.courier-mta.org/imap/README.maildirquota.html: ,---- | The default application configuration that uses this
2006 Jul 01
1
Rdconv --type=Ssgm drops singleton keywords (PR#9051)
If an Rd file has only one keyword entry then the Splus sgm file made with Rdconv --type=SSgm has no keyword entries. To reproduce: Use prompt() to make a skeleton help file R> f<-function(x)log(1+x)-log1p(x) R> prompt(f) Created file named 'f.Rd'. Edit the file and move it to the appropriate directory. R> q() It has 2 \keyword entries in it
2012 Mar 03
2
keywords/flags questions
Hello, I am currently using dovecot 2.0.13 and I have been working on keywords handling our webmail and I have a few questions about how dovecot handles them. First, if I am not mistaken keywords neeed to be UTF-7 encoded. That means I need to encode special caracters using values between & and - chars. UTF-7 encoding is case sensitive, &AOA- isn't the same chars as &aoa-.
2005 Apr 29
2
How to check for keywords in IMAP store?
Hello, I'm checking my way to migrate from Courier to Dovecot. Wiki says that "there's currently no easy way to migrate them [the keywords]". Frankly, I lack the information to check if some client is using keywords at all. More importantly, is it OK to assume that when SELECT INBOX returns no \* in OK [PERMANENTFLAGS ...] that the IMAP server does not allow keywords at
2010 Dec 29
2
\VignetteKeywords{}, for KEYWORDS or for free-tagging?
Hi R-devel, [Question]: * Is there a KEYWORDS file to lookup 'keywords' to supply the vignette command, '\VignetteKeywords{}'? -or, is the pkg writer free to tag the vignette using any keywords he/she chooses? i.e., free-tagging. Thank you, + Elliot Kleiman __________________________ San Diego State University http://www.sdsu.edu/
2019 Mar 12
0
dovecot-keywords are not preserved any more when moving mails between folders
On 12 Mar 2019, at 17.55, Dan Christensen via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > On Mar 12, 2019, Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > >> On 12.3.2019 13.46, Piper Andreas via dovecot wrote: >> >>> after an upgrade of dovecot-2.2.5 to dovecot-2.3.4 the dovecot-keywords, >>> which in my case are set by thunderbird,
2010 Jun 14
1
Patch to fix leak in imap_refresh_proctitle in beta[5, 6]
The "imap" process of dovecot-2.0.beta[5,6] grows very large (I impose no system limits), e.g. exceeding 4.8GB on a 64-bit system. These messages appear in the logs: Warning: Growing pool 'imap client' with: 2048 Warning: Growing pool 'Cache fields' with: 2048 Warning: Growing data stack with: 32768 Warning: Growing data stack with: 65536 Warning: Growing data stack
2004 Jan 20
1
requesting new entry to keywords.db
R-developers: How do we go about adding keywords to the KEYWORDS and KEYWORDS.db files? I would like to add "econometrics & Econometrics" to the Statistics section of the file... Is this something I would have to do through CVS? Statistics datagen & Functions for generating data sets distribution & Probability Distributions and Random Numbers univar & simple
2019 Mar 12
0
dovecot-keywords are not preserved any more when moving mails between folders
On 12.3.2019 13.46, Piper Andreas via dovecot wrote: > Hello, > > after an upgrade of dovecot-2.2.5 to dovecot-2.3.4 the dovecot-keywords, > which in my case are set by thunderbird, are not preserved any more when > moving a mail between folders. > > Are there any ideas, what may be the reason. > > Thanks for any hints on that, > Andreas > > 'doveconf
2008 Dec 15
5
Apple patches 1-5
Here are the first few simple patches from Apple, based on dovecot-1.1.7. The comments with "APPLE" in them helped us merge in your new releases; feel free to remove them. Please let me know if you want subsequent patches in a different format, or if you have any questions. Patch #1. Some versions of Mac OS X have buggy CMSG_* macros. -------------- next part -------------- A