similar to: Maildir Synchronization warnings

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "Maildir Synchronization warnings"

2013 Jul 25
1
Duplicate Mails downloding issue
Hi All, We are repeatedly getting the below warning / errors on our pop server. Please help us out buy knowing what could be the issue. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jul 23 15:34:51 popserver dovecot: pop3(14949_kavish): Warning: Locking transaction log file
2013 Aug 27
1
Error: file_dotlock_open() failed with file + Too many open files
Hi All, We are getting these below error on our IMAP server. is this because of open file limits.?? We have set it to 4096. [root at vish conf.d]# ulimit -n 4096 Aug 27 16:08:26 imap(kavish.karkera at example.com-24685): Error: file_dotlock_open() failed with file /data/quarantine/index//data/quarantine/mailstore/24685/.INBOX.kavish.karkera/dovecot.index.cache: Too many open files Aug 27
2012 Aug 07
1
Dovecot with Company - level Quota
Hi Timo, We are using maildir as quota-backend , and performing user level quota, which is working fine.? (using dovecot 2.x ). Now the requirement is to , restrict the quota to client / company level along with user level quota. ?For. eg. We have a mailbox path like /mail/mailstore/10001/kavish.karkera at linoquery.com/Maildir/ where 10001 is Client code (unique number given to very client)
2012 Aug 21
1
Error: Couldn't open INBOX: Timeout while waiting for lock
Hi , My users are frequetly getting the below error, Aug 21 00:04:18 blade6 dovecot: pop3-login: proxy(hgl_dipak): Login failed to 192.168.1.43:110: [IN-USE] Couldn't open INBOX: Timeout while waiting for lock. We are proxing pop connections from one pop server (dovecot version 1.1.20) i.e 192.168.1.39 to the other pop Server (Dovecot version 2.0.16 ) i.e 192.168.1.4. We have set?
2013 Apr 03
2
Error : File too large
Hi , When accessing mails through webmail(roundcube), we were getting below error's in huge Please help to know .. what this error is related to.. dovecot version , we are using is 2.1.15 Mar 28 15:37:47 imapserver dovecot: imap(cel_default): Error: rename(/mail/mailstore/linoquery.com/lino_default/Maildir/new/1364463180.M563166P30867.imapserver,S=3263,W=3309,
2013 Aug 21
2
High Load Average on POP/IMAP.
Hi, We have a serious issue running on our POP/IMAP servers these days. The load average of a servers spikes up to 400-500 as a uptime command result, for a particular time period , to be specific mostly in noon time and evening, but it last for few minutes only. We have 2 servers running dovecot 1.1.20 , in loadbanlancer, We have used KEEPLIVE (1.1.13) for loadbalacing. Server
2013 May 23
0
Error: Initial status notification not received
Hi , We are getting a below error on our Dovecot POP/IMAP server on every alternate days. Please help us in knowing with the errors are related to May 23 02:40:05 blade7 dovecot: master: Error: service(pop3-login): Initial status notification not received in 30 seconds, k illing the process May 23 02:40:05 blade7 dovecot: master: Error: service(log): child 8697 killed with signal 9 May 23
2011 Nov 21
1
uid=error
Hi Timo, We are facing this issue on our mail server 1. Two email id's are mapped to a same account 2. If I send a mail to both the account simultaneously i get below error "Nov 21 12:13:37 blade8 dovecot: lda(kapil.gupta at qlc.in): save: box=INBOX, uid=error, msgid=<1321857820.4ec9f31ce638c at SwiftMailer.generated>, size=10921" 3. Due to this the mail is delivered only to
2013 Dec 09
0
Gluster - replica - Unable to self-heal contents of '/' (possible split-brain)
Hello, I''m trying to build a replica volume, on two servers. The servers are: blade6 and blade7. (another blade1 in the peer, but with no volumes) The volume seems ok, but I cannot mount it from NFS. Here are some logs: [root@blade6 stor1]# df -h /dev/mapper/gluster_stor1 882G 200M 837G 1% /gluster/stor1 [root@blade7 stor1]# df -h /dev/mapper/gluster_fast
2014 Dec 11
2
PJSIP configuration question
Dan Cropp wrote: > I had my screenshots flipped. Is there a way to make sure the Contact field is NOT included in the ACK response to the OK (for the Answer)? > > PJSIP is including the Contact for the ACK response to the OK. > Contact:<sip:1234 at xxx.xxx.xx.xxx:5060> > There is no configuration option to configure this behavior. What is the full SIP signaling? -- Joshua
2004 Dec 06
0
Samba and Windows Synchronization
I have Samba setup on a RedHat 9.0 box. Everything configured properly I can manually copy files etc with no problem. However when I try to use windows synchronization I always get an "access denied" on an or all files/folders changed or created. In smb.conf I have it as follows: [files] comment = files path = /file/ valid users = adm public
2011 Aug 31
0
Account locking synchronization between Linux and Windows (my solution)
We are using a Samba domain controller with a Sun Directory Server 7 LDAP backend and we observed that when an account was locked out on Windows, it would not lock the account on Linux as well. We are using Samba 3.0.33 on CentOS 5.3 and this is the change I made: To configure samba to perform proper windows lockout in conjunction with a linux lockout,
2012 May 28
0
HTTP request synchronization in rails
Hi, I am executing a HTTP request for more number of times concurrently using Jemetr. I want each thread possessing one request at any cost. Means that when the first thread processing one request, the next request exist in another thread shouldn''t allow to go in .. until or unless the first thread completes the process. Please let me know your suggestions. My package details: Ruby
2007 Aug 21
2
[PATCH] Fix lazy mode vmalloc synchronization for paravirt
Found this looping Ubuntu installs with VMI. If unlucky enough to hit a vmalloc sync fault during a lazy mode = operation (from an IRQ handler for a module which was not yet populated = in current page directory, or from inside copy_one_pte, which touches = swap_map, and hit in an unused 4M region), the required PDE update would = never get flushed, causing an infinite page fault loop. This
2007 Aug 21
2
[PATCH] Fix lazy mode vmalloc synchronization for paravirt
Found this looping Ubuntu installs with VMI. If unlucky enough to hit a vmalloc sync fault during a lazy mode = operation (from an IRQ handler for a module which was not yet populated = in current page directory, or from inside copy_one_pte, which touches = swap_map, and hit in an unused 4M region), the required PDE update would = never get flushed, causing an infinite page fault loop. This
2006 Mar 24
0
time synchronization of dom0 and domUs still not working?
Hi folks, I am using Xen 2.0.7 with debian based dom0 and domUs on several machines. Every few days I find the clocks of dom0 and domUs on the same machine to differ between seconds and hours. I know this is mentionened every now and then on the list. What I want to know: Is this bug still officially not fixed? Is something done to fix it or is it left as is? I just have to know the state
2008 Dec 23
1
compiz segmentation fault and synchronization
Hi all, I got a segmentation fault in compiz and after some analysis have a question about synchronization in core compiz functions.
2011 Mar 18
0
Note about RHBZ#576879 libguestfs protocol loses synchronization if you 'upload' before mounting disks
I just pushed a commit which reenables two tests for: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576879 libguestfs protocol loses synchronization if you 'upload' before mounting disks http://git.annexia.org/?p=libguestfs.git;a=commitdiff;h=dc8e4b057ecd3984d7c27c8ece54048b6a06d662 This is a really long-standing bug which we thought we'd fixed, but then turned up again. It currently
2007 Nov 09
2
[LLVMdev] Atomicity and synchronization
There was some discussion in the summer on the mailing list about atomicity and synchronization primitives for LLVM. Is there any progress being made in that department? -- Pertti
2007 Nov 09
0
[LLVMdev] Atomicity and synchronization
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, [ISO-8859-1] Pertti Kellom�ki wrote: > There was some discussion in the summer on the mailing list > about atomicity and synchronization primitives for LLVM. Is > there any progress being made in that department? Nope, not that I know of. -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/